Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

10 Pages « < 2 3 4 5 6 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Girl's Club Clean-up, before the section dies..........

views
     
beck_ken
post Mar 25 2008, 07:34 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,716 posts

Joined: May 2006
From: KL, Malaysia


I think the old rule, girls are only allowed to post a thread, still stand
beside, for guys who is planning or going to post reply...their reply must be related or constructive meaning to the topic. If their reply are "spam"...serve them a warning.

as for those topic that only satisfied those so called "female" tag member's fantasy, close it and served them 1 week or more ban from forum.
fujkenasai
post Mar 25 2008, 07:53 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,137 posts

Joined: Mar 2006
QUOTE(suiteng @ Mar 25 2008, 05:20 PM)
If there's a DOB section in your profile, should be able to check age too right? smile.gif
Well, as I said, if you can't stop it - make a section for it.

At least this way GC is cleaner.
*
Ohh yeah forgot about that been quite a while since I registered here.

QUOTE(misao @ Mar 25 2008, 06:15 PM)
This one sounds very suspicious to me. Especially the 'including hp number' part!  flex.gif
*
As I said its a buaya in disguise ph34r.gif

QUOTE(goldfries @ Mar 25 2008, 07:13 PM)
to mod a sex thread isn't an issue if people talk like mature adults. unfortunately it isn't so over at LYN.
*
Can't we just BAN sex threads, what so constructive about it anyway if they want to learn there are tones of info for them to google about.

QUOTE(beck_ken @ Mar 25 2008, 07:34 PM)
I think the old rule, girls are only allowed to post a thread, still stand
beside, for guys who is planning or going to post reply...their reply must be related or constructive meaning to the topic. If their reply are "spam"...serve them a warning.

as for those topic that only satisfied those so called "female" tag member's fantasy, close it and served them 1 week or more ban from forum.
*
Either old rules or just BAN sex thread permanently.
fruitie
post Mar 25 2008, 09:05 PM

Rise and Shine
Group Icon
Staff
72,760 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
From: KUL

I would agree on the idea to ban topics that contain sex contents permanently.
Idea on banning shemales should be implemented though it is not so effective as things are out of control, after all this is Internet. Fakes and lies are everywhere.


p/s: Hey, I am a real female OK? tongue.gif
Gladys
post Mar 25 2008, 10:54 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
158 posts

Joined: Nov 2004


for sex topic.. malaysianbabes actually required pw to access that protected forum. maybe we can do that too ? for real girl who want to enter, password will be ic.. ic can differentiate female or shemale. of coz..system implement thingy leave to mod how they wannt it to be verification.

:\
fujkenasai
post Mar 25 2008, 11:14 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,137 posts

Joined: Mar 2006
QUOTE(Gladys @ Mar 25 2008, 10:54 PM)
for sex topic.. malaysianbabes actually required pw to access that protected forum. maybe we can do that too ? for real girl who want to enter, password will be ic.. ic can differentiate female or shemale. of coz..system implement thingy leave to mod how they wannt it to be verification.

:\
*
No offence though I feel that even there the topics are too sluty and perverted. Maybe just my background on sex.
Gladys
post Mar 25 2008, 11:21 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
158 posts

Joined: Nov 2004


erm.. i mean not open sex chat like the link quote above la..
certain thing still allow to discuss rite ? as long as have a mod to monitor it. n shoo away all the shemale n perverted topic doh.gif

fujkenasai
post Mar 26 2008, 12:23 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,137 posts

Joined: Mar 2006
QUOTE(Gladys @ Mar 25 2008, 11:21 PM)
erm.. i mean not open sex chat like the link quote above la..
certain thing still allow to discuss rite ?  as long as have a mod to monitor it. n shoo away all the shemale n perverted topic doh.gif
*
Yeah shooing away the shemales is of primary importance. Just ban them all.
RoxyGal
post Mar 26 2008, 01:58 AM

٩͡[๏̯͡๏]۶ Im roxygal ٩͡[๏̯͡๏]۶
******
Senior Member
1,031 posts

Joined: Sep 2006
From: ▁▂▃▅▇ ٩͡[๏̯͡๏]۶?



QUOTE(Gladys @ Mar 25 2008, 10:54 PM)
for sex topic.. malaysianbabes actually required pw to access that protected forum. maybe we can do that too ? for real girl who want to enter, password will be ic.. ic can differentiate female or shemale. of coz..system implement thingy leave to mod how they wannt it to be verification.

:\
*
later moderator or people use my IC to scam forummer how wor?
izcuje
post Mar 26 2008, 03:25 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
133 posts

Joined: Jun 2005
From: Minas Tirith


QUOTE(fujkenasai @ Mar 26 2008, 12:23 AM)
Yeah shooing away the shemales is of primary importance. Just ban them all.
*
True. If they have something legit to discuss, they wouldn't be posing as a female afterall.
nicKit
post Mar 26 2008, 03:13 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
374 posts

Joined: Aug 2005
i support the ban all sex-related stuffs...
i think goldfries tried to recruit a new mod for GC back then... but no one?
wif less eyes watching in GC, of coz it's a big mess...
i miss those days when GC is a happy place to come over... sad.gif
fujkenasai
post Mar 26 2008, 03:25 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,137 posts

Joined: Mar 2006
QUOTE(nicKit @ Mar 26 2008, 03:13 PM)
i support the ban all sex-related stuffs...
i think goldfries tried to recruit a new mod for GC back then... but no one?
wif less eyes watching in GC, of coz it's a big mess...
i miss those days when GC is a happy place to come over... sad.gif
*
Make all the frequent posting reliable girls mods, but for only GC? Then that solves the problem of not enough eyes? hmm.gif
nicKit
post Mar 26 2008, 03:37 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
374 posts

Joined: Aug 2005
QUOTE(fujkenasai @ Mar 26 2008, 03:25 PM)
Make all the frequent posting reliable girls mods, but for only GC? Then that solves the problem of not enough eyes? hmm.gif
*
or mayb pre-approved thread? new thread need to be approved then can show up? hmm.gif
Gladys
post Mar 26 2008, 09:52 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
158 posts

Joined: Nov 2004


pre-app la stuff like that just create more job for a mod la..who wanna do these thing :\

@rosygirl, jsut a suggention anyway, no necessary must be ic.. hmm
ban guy or not, actually jsut secondary issue.. primary issue is need a mod to clean up those *_*" topic. ugly sin @ GC.


fujkenasai
post Mar 26 2008, 10:33 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,137 posts

Joined: Mar 2006
QUOTE(nicKit @ Mar 26 2008, 03:37 PM)
or mayb pre-approved thread? new thread need to be approved then can show up? hmm.gif
*
But then the topic can still go other ways.

QUOTE(Gladys @ Mar 26 2008, 09:52 PM)
pre-app la stuff like that just create more job for a mod la..who wanna do these thing :\

@rosygirl, jsut a suggention anyway, no necessary must be ic.. hmm
ban guy or not, actually jsut secondary issue.. primary issue is need a mod to clean up those *_*" topic. ugly sin @ GC.
*
Yeah throw the rubbish out and keep them out.
TSgoldfries
post Mar 27 2008, 12:11 AM

40K Club
Group Icon
Forum Admin
44,415 posts

Joined: Jan 2003




http://forum.lowyat.net/topic/658864/
this topic i allowed a chance to be open but from the current direction, I'm inclined to close it so I'm going to do it.

smile.gif this is also based on the general feedback that action should be taken on sex-related topic.

seriously la. from my POV, there's more things to a Girl's life than sex. sex is just 1 part of it, just as with any other individual on earth - male or female.

from now on. SEX related topics are to be cloesd on sight. smile.gif
Gladys
post Mar 27 2008, 12:14 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
158 posts

Joined: Nov 2004


aiyerr

converted muslim thread doh.gif


TSgoldfries
post Mar 27 2008, 12:14 AM

40K Club
Group Icon
Forum Admin
44,415 posts

Joined: Jan 2003




QUOTE(suiteng @ Mar 25 2008, 04:06 PM)
About NO GUYS ALLOWED TO CREATE THREAD should really be enforced. But give a longer and heavier penalty as suggested by many of us here biggrin.gif


eh, it has always been enforced.

you didn't realize how many people i sent off for holiday for the offence ah?


Added on March 27, 2008, 12:20 am
QUOTE(Gladys @ Mar 27 2008, 12:14 AM)
aiyerr

converted muslim thread doh.gif
*
sorry. what's this ah? care to elaborate?

anyway you ladies confirm with the "ban / take action on sex related threads" thing? or would you ladies prefer "allow it to open BUT see how it goes" ?

either way, use the report button. or PM me should you think a thread is worth KIV for closing.

This post has been edited by goldfries: Mar 27 2008, 12:20 AM
suiteng
post Mar 27 2008, 11:25 AM

Hopeless President
*******
Senior Member
3,589 posts

Joined: Nov 2004


QUOTE(goldfries @ Mar 27 2008, 12:14 AM)
eh, it has always been enforced.

you didn't realize how many people i sent off for holiday for the offence ah?
*
3 days too short. They will be back. What about heavier penalty like a week, that's more scary nod.gif

Girls, what's your opinion on the above?
feyhime
post Mar 27 2008, 11:48 AM

Getting Started
Group Icon
Elite
257 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
From: ~somewhere in dreamland~


At least one week! Make it 2 XD deprive them off LYN XD
TSgoldfries
post Mar 27 2008, 12:03 PM

40K Club
Group Icon
Forum Admin
44,415 posts

Joined: Jan 2003




ok. how about those sexually related threads? like the one started by @nnie recently.

10 Pages « < 2 3 4 5 6 > » Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0200sec    0.70    5 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 26th November 2025 - 03:23 AM