Xigmatek HDT-s1283 Red-Scorpion Review, Come Join The Community..
Xigmatek HDT-s1283 Red-Scorpion Review, Come Join The Community..
|
|
Mar 23 2008, 04:04 AM
Return to original view | Post
#21
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,547 posts Joined: Oct 2007 |
ya...thanks to ur review
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mar 23 2008, 02:13 PM
Return to original view | Post
#22
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,547 posts Joined: Oct 2007 |
|
|
|
Mar 23 2008, 05:46 PM
Return to original view | Post
#23
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,547 posts Joined: Oct 2007 |
QUOTE(ir1z @ Mar 23 2008, 04:12 PM) anyway care to explain whats the use of the fin? should i use it or not the fin is for directing the some amount of air downward to ur to cool ur mobo chipset or something like that ive just dimantled my whole pc damn there lots of junk in there..............hahaha now adding more junk in it hahaha..... |
|
|
Mar 24 2008, 10:04 PM
Return to original view | Post
#24
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,547 posts Joined: Oct 2007 |
try to do exactly like the same way vincentlaw fixed his fan n then remount ur scorpion... btw... pls check for ur clearance between proc n heatsink... make sure the contact is good... cos the most likely problem will be ur contact as i have seen ppl using this heatsink without fan on a OCed setup n yet the temp is only around 65c
This post has been edited by tkh_1001: Mar 24 2008, 10:08 PM |
|
|
Mar 24 2008, 11:12 PM
Return to original view | Post
#25
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,547 posts Joined: Oct 2007 |
|
|
|
Mar 24 2008, 11:27 PM
Return to original view | Post
#26
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,547 posts Joined: Oct 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mar 25 2008, 02:55 PM
Return to original view | Post
#27
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,547 posts Joined: Oct 2007 |
they are preparing it to be used on future octa-core proc
|
|
|
Mar 25 2008, 06:01 PM
Return to original view | Post
#28
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,547 posts Joined: Oct 2007 |
QUOTE(vincentlaw @ Mar 25 2008, 04:24 PM) other brand is using 4 heatpipe but not 8mm..... if 8mm also not direct touch.... without direct touch u can put as many heatpipe as u can since the heat transfer thru the copper bast to heatpipe.... but direct heatpipe touch (HDT) is a more efficient heat transfer... the question im wondering here is whether the 4x 8mm heatpipe can FULLY directly touch with processor anot.... thus, this will allow the heat transfer away from the proc a lil faster ...this way it will make sense for teh increment of 10-15% performance right? |
|
|
Mar 25 2008, 06:27 PM
Return to original view | Post
#29
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,547 posts Joined: Oct 2007 |
QUOTE(sukhoi37 @ Mar 25 2008, 06:10 PM) QUOTE(vincentlaw @ Mar 25 2008, 06:21 PM) hmm not very agreed... if they wanna do as what u said... they can just use 3x 8mm heatpipe and branching from the 3 heatpipes. Thier purpose for 4 HDT is to direct touch to IHS but i doubt current processor can fully contact with 4 HDT... just a noob guess actually AMD proc is more advantage in this situation since thier contact area with heatsink is much larger...... not now for Intel, maybe in future... @vincent well if according to what u say, then it means this is made for AMD? didnt realise that amd proc has bigger contact before u say this This post has been edited by tkh_1001: Mar 25 2008, 06:28 PM |
|
|
Mar 26 2008, 02:04 PM
Return to original view | Post
#30
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,547 posts Joined: Oct 2007 |
QUOTE(ham_revilo @ Mar 26 2008, 11:23 AM) bro... did u just came back from the future ? look at the cpu-z core speed! anyways..fesick's temp is around 55c with normal s1283 la @ aircond room iinm... seems like red scropion n the old ones not much difference » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « |
|
|
Mar 26 2008, 11:32 PM
Return to original view | Post
#31
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,547 posts Joined: Oct 2007 |
|
|
|
Mar 26 2008, 11:46 PM
Return to original view | Post
#32
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,547 posts Joined: Oct 2007 |
so when is ur 4.0ghz coming?
|
|
|
Mar 27 2008, 12:16 AM
Return to original view | Post
#33
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,547 posts Joined: Oct 2007 |
QUOTE(ham_revilo @ Mar 27 2008, 12:04 AM) e6550 all this while is known for high oc ability but the multiplier is too low so those who like oc kaw kaw wont go for it.... actually that could be mobo limitation too right? but 495 @ stock vcore very good edi la... my proc langsung nonit to dream reaching even 410 on stock vcore too bad my ram cannot tahan... or not i bet can go higher than 495x7... @fesick i also can seem to get it stable at 500mhz.. keep bsod when testing... |
|
|
|
|
|
Mar 27 2008, 07:13 AM
Return to original view | Post
#34
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,547 posts Joined: Oct 2007 |
QUOTE(ham_revilo @ Mar 27 2008, 01:36 AM) afaik not all 8400 can do that... the very first batch can do that but still rare... 3.6 for 8400 is peanut but go higher or reaching 4.0 may be a problem for some... this is maybe true if u are talking bout on stock vcore bro... but if OCing with higher voltage e8xxx has no prob at all to hit 4.0ghz.... the hard part only comes when u are hitting 4.2 n beyond |
|
|
Mar 27 2008, 03:27 PM
Return to original view | Post
#35
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,547 posts Joined: Oct 2007 |
|
|
|
Mar 28 2008, 04:15 PM
Return to original view | Post
#36
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,547 posts Joined: Oct 2007 |
@maxz663
its a normal thing that those push pin are very hard to push in maybe u can try pushing it in a cross-way... push the pin in the opposite position after pushing in the 1st pin in n so on This post has been edited by tkh_1001: Mar 28 2008, 04:17 PM |
|
|
Mar 29 2008, 02:40 AM
Return to original view | Post
#37
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,547 posts Joined: Oct 2007 |
becareful with ur voltage oohh.... bahaya nie
|
|
|
Mar 31 2008, 07:49 PM
Return to original view | Post
#38
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,547 posts Joined: Oct 2007 |
|
|
|
Apr 2 2008, 06:26 PM
Return to original view | Post
#39
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,547 posts Joined: Oct 2007 |
still using old version of prime 95 ka bro?
|
|
|
Apr 2 2008, 09:07 PM
Return to original view | Post
#40
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,547 posts Joined: Oct 2007 |
QUOTE(fesick @ Apr 2 2008, 06:29 PM) eh...hehe,got new version ka?i just do quick search on google.. tada..... here u go... whats the new version if got any? edited:i only found version 24 only.. http://www.softpedia.com/get/Others/Home-E...n/Prime95.shtml |
| Change to: | 0.0342sec
0.72
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 30th November 2025 - 11:32 PM |