Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
115 Pages « < 52 53 54 55 56 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 AMDŽ Socket-AM2/AM2+ Overclocking thread (V6), Will AMD alive??

views
     
casperito
post Feb 27 2008, 02:08 AM

221.133.99.99
****
Senior Member
662 posts

Joined: Feb 2006
From: int eth 5/0/16 vlan 13


QUOTE(ocz @ Feb 27 2008, 02:06 AM)
I am hoping AMD will rise back and defeat intel. thumbup.gif

When will be the released date of the Tri-Core? Anyone knows?
*
err.. im not sure about this but maybe around early Q2 2008.. maybe or maybe earlier.. or maybe later... ehehe

dblooi
post Feb 27 2008, 02:08 AM

......
******
Senior Member
1,404 posts

Joined: Apr 2006
From: ......



QUOTE(alive88 @ Feb 27 2008, 01:57 AM)
only comparisons?different speed sure tri core will get left behind in benchmarking with single core..shud oc to 3.0 then make a comparison lor
*
haha, don't blame them
Those are ITOCP overclockers whistling.gif
they won't know why have to compare in such way 1 whistling.gif
haha, sorry.. i don't like them laugh.gif
ocz
post Feb 27 2008, 02:09 AM

Cinematographer
*******
Senior Member
2,827 posts

Joined: Mar 2007
From: MALAYSIA



QUOTE(casperito @ Feb 27 2008, 02:08 AM)
err.. im not sure about this but maybe around early Q2 2008.. maybe or maybe earlier.. or maybe later... ehehe
*
No more delay maybe. rclxms.gif

QUOTE(dblooi @ Feb 27 2008, 02:08 AM)
haha, don't blame them
Those are ITOCP overclockers  whistling.gif
they won't know why have to compare in such way 1 whistling.gif
haha, sorry.. i don't like them  laugh.gif
*
I am really sure they are your rival. brows.gif
mizivincible
post Feb 27 2008, 02:14 AM

"They'll be singing que sera sera"
******
Senior Member
1,633 posts

Joined: Oct 2007
From: Cheras, Selangor


Wow, seems like this B3 is hot, at least ppl are talking about it. Hopefully like what sempronic said, B2 = F2 , B3 = F3 in terms of oc capability.
casperito
post Feb 27 2008, 02:15 AM

221.133.99.99
****
Senior Member
662 posts

Joined: Feb 2006
From: int eth 5/0/16 vlan 13


QUOTE(dblooi @ Feb 27 2008, 02:08 AM)
haha, don't blame them
Those are ITOCP overclockers  whistling.gif
they won't know why have to compare in such way 1 whistling.gif
haha, sorry.. i don't like them  laugh.gif
*
i think i get wat u mean... heheheh

QUOTE(ocz @ Feb 27 2008, 02:09 AM)
No more delay maybe. rclxms.gif
*
not juz that.. hope that it will at least make it OCable rather than the b2 batches now..
FuiLo
post Feb 27 2008, 02:27 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
252 posts

Joined: Sep 2007
From: Sandakan,Sabah


QUOTE(alive88 @ Feb 27 2008, 02:07 AM)
like the good old days back in athlon xp time.. tongue.gif
*
Yalor give me a recall too..last time benchies even my old AMD XP 1500+ running at 1.33Ghz easily beat P4 1.8Ghz.. thumbup.gif
dblooi
post Feb 27 2008, 02:33 AM

......
******
Senior Member
1,404 posts

Joined: Apr 2006
From: ......



QUOTE(ocz @ Feb 27 2008, 02:09 AM)
No more delay maybe. rclxms.gif
I am really sure they are your rival. brows.gif
*
That's long story laugh.gif
I believe that we all are same,
we love to make friend with humble/gentle guys/overclockers wub.gif wub.gif
User_Xp
post Feb 27 2008, 05:39 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
973 posts

Joined: Oct 2004
From: CarJunk


AMD introduce B3 series in 9750,9650 and 9550 which clocked at 2.4,2.3 and 2.2 Ghz sweat.gif sweat.gif sweat.gif
i just now it just fix the TLB issues...about the OC.. rclxub.gif
TS-pWs-
post Feb 27 2008, 08:44 AM

Look at all my stars!!
Group Icon
Elite
8,545 posts

Joined: Aug 2006
From: 224.0.0.6


@User_Xp
They already fixed TLB???

-pWs-
sempronic
post Feb 27 2008, 08:53 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
986 posts

Joined: Jul 2006
From: :: infront the steering ::


QUOTE(User_Xp @ Feb 27 2008, 05:39 AM)
AMD introduce B3 series in 9750,9650 and 9550 which clocked at 2.4,2.3 and 2.2 Ghz  sweat.gif  sweat.gif  sweat.gif
i just now it just fix the TLB issues...about the OC.. rclxub.gif
*
the OC capabilities is not great coz Phenom originally design for a server usage....
maybe AMD thinking that why server need to OC?? sweat.gif

They should not forget about thier FAN & Overclocker.....WE NEED TO OC COZ IT REALLY TEMTING!!! drool.gif drool.gif
previous At the time they compete with P4, the Athlon XP sure kicking ass killer for the Barton core.
Then AMD keep improving till the 64bit out...then intel copy the 64bit technology.....so AMD should make some killer proc....dont forget all the FAN & the Overclocker.... tongue.gif

fuzore
post Feb 27 2008, 08:54 AM

<motion sickness around>
*******
Senior Member
2,142 posts

Joined: Jan 2008
From: who wants to know?



QUOTE(za_az @ Feb 26 2008, 04:06 PM)
Its juz to see either the probs due to ur hsf or casing airflow.. laugh.gif Then if better wif current setup, probs might be from airflow thumbup.gif Then can oc more, beat my result oso maybe brows.gif
*
wei..za_az..ur right la about my casing airflow after i open my side panel the temp went down
5-6c and i manage to get 2.6GHz with 1.5vcore...idle temp 43c


Attached Image

then tried super pi pass 32m... rclxms.gif

Attached Image

then tried orthos...temp alredy climbing...69c for 3min sweat.gif

Attached Image

then at 4min got error.. cry.gif

Attached Image

hate myself for this.. vmad.gif .still need more experiment to do hmm.gif

k3et
post Feb 27 2008, 09:08 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
192 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Subang Jaya and Off Jln Puchong (near OUG)


QUOTE(alive88 @ Feb 26 2008, 02:37 AM)
ur hardware is gud..only the ram wont clock high..vcore for 3.2 is good(guess so,i never use BE)
how much vdimm u pumped?mybe u can try to change the divider or perhaps
tighten the timing to CL4?
*
i tried to pumped more vdimm but still can't get high FSB. Btw what is the recommended highest vdimm that we should pumped for Kingston Value Ram without heatspreader?

So far the max I'd tried to pump is at vdimm 2.20 but still can't boot up whenever FSB240 and above.

Below 240FSB can boot but orthos fail.
digswell
post Feb 27 2008, 09:15 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,484 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Nilai,N.S.D.K
QUOTE(fuzore @ Feb 27 2008, 08:54 AM)
wei..za_az..ur right la about my casing airflow after i open my side panel the temp went down
5-6c and i manage to get 2.6GHz with 1.5vcore...idle temp 43c
Attached Image

then tried super pi pass 32m... rclxms.gif


then tried orthos...temp alredy climbing...69c for 3min  sweat.gif

then at 4min got error.. cry.gif


hate myself for this.. vmad.gif .still need more experiment to do  hmm.gif
*
Ur Cpu temp reading is very high.......CM hyper UC all most same with hyper xt
only the fan is different.....hyper UC fan is very bad performance
try to change the fan and buy only black colour fan

ADD: Those Bling Bling LED FAN is Very BAD PERFORMANCE compare with lausy black colour fan

This post has been edited by digswell: Feb 27 2008, 09:18 AM
ah_khoo
post Feb 27 2008, 09:20 AM

- No Action Talk Only -
Group Icon
Elite
8,103 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Tanah Lot @ Dungun, Terengganu.


QUOTE(sempronic @ Feb 27 2008, 08:53 AM)
the OC capabilities is not great coz Phenom originally design for a server usage....
maybe AMD thinking that why server need to OC?? sweat.gif

They should not forget about thier FAN & Overclocker.....WE NEED TO OC COZ IT REALLY TEMTING!!! drool.gif  drool.gif
previous At the time they compete with P4, the Athlon XP sure kicking ass killer for the Barton core.
Then AMD keep improving till the 64bit out...then intel copy the 64bit technology.....so AMD should make some killer proc....dont forget all the FAN & the Overclocker.... tongue.gif
*
bro, phenom are for desktop, barcelona are for servers. smile.gif

if tri-core phenoms are sellin @ price of intel e2x00 series, i'm quite sure there'll be users from intel jump ship to amd again (but provided they fix d tlb thingy and can clock better, not 2.5 / 2.6GHz only)... nod.gif
sempronic
post Feb 27 2008, 09:38 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
986 posts

Joined: Jul 2006
From: :: infront the steering ::


QUOTE(ah_khoo @ Feb 27 2008, 09:20 AM)
bro, phenom are for desktop, barcelona are for servers.  smile.gif

if tri-core phenoms are sellin @ price of intel e2x00 series, i'm quite sure there'll be users from intel jump ship to amd again (but provided they fix d tlb thingy and can clock better, not 2.5 / 2.6GHz only)...  nod.gif
*
yeah it for desktop...but the tech and architectures from the barcelona....
so we just wait what will the B3 result....
fuzore
post Feb 27 2008, 09:46 AM

<motion sickness around>
*******
Senior Member
2,142 posts

Joined: Jan 2008
From: who wants to know?



QUOTE(digswell @ Feb 27 2008, 09:15 AM)
Ur Cpu temp reading is very high.......CM hyper UC  all most same with hyper xt
only the fan is different.....hyper UC fan is very bad performance
try to change the fan and buy only black colour fan

ADD: Those Bling Bling LED FAN is Very BAD PERFORMANCE compare with lausy black colour fan
*
ya la..quite bad la cry.gif

thinking either Xigmatek SHT1283 or Tuniq Tower 120 la which one is better ha... hmm.gif
casperito
post Feb 27 2008, 09:57 AM

221.133.99.99
****
Senior Member
662 posts

Joined: Feb 2006
From: int eth 5/0/16 vlan 13


QUOTE(ah_khoo @ Feb 27 2008, 09:20 AM)
bro, phenom are for desktop, barcelona are for servers.  smile.gif

if tri-core phenoms are sellin @ price of intel e2x00 series, i'm quite sure there'll be users from intel jump ship to amd again (but provided they fix d tlb thingy and can clock better, not 2.5 / 2.6GHz only)...  nod.gif
*
it maybe can be clock better but i doubt the performance could even match C2Q... well at least it OC able...

AMD should do to phenom juz like wat they do to Barcelona...
when the TLB was found, all the shipped barcelona was taken back but phenom was still on sale int the market...
some pros say that AMD announce the TLB issues maybe juz to cover up the bad performance of the phenom...
i think the TLB issues should not be announce coz TLB prob is kinda hard to occur unless the computer uses heavy load... combination of activities... usually we see this on servers...


digswell
post Feb 27 2008, 10:25 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,484 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Nilai,N.S.D.K
QUOTE(fuzore @ Feb 27 2008, 09:46 AM)
ya la..quite bad la  cry.gif

thinking either Xigmatek SHT1283 or Tuniq Tower 120 la which one is better ha... hmm.gif
*
Xigmatek SHT1283 , Tuniq Tower 120 or Thermalright Ultra-120 xtreme all is very good performance

i do prefer tis big monster Thermalright Ultra-120 xtreme
fuzore
post Feb 27 2008, 10:31 AM

<motion sickness around>
*******
Senior Member
2,142 posts

Joined: Jan 2008
From: who wants to know?



QUOTE(digswell @ Feb 27 2008, 10:25 AM)
Xigmatek SHT1283 , Tuniq Tower 120 or Thermalright Ultra-120 xtreme all is very good performance

i do prefer tis big monster  Thermalright Ultra-120 xtreme
*
yes right i do prefer the monster ultra to...but its to pricey la for me...3++ rm if i'm not mistaken right.. shakehead.gif doh.gif
thats why i'm looking for HDT-S1283 or Tuniq Tower 120 this 2 cost around 1++ rm right... nod.gif
digswell
post Feb 27 2008, 10:48 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,484 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Nilai,N.S.D.K
QUOTE(fuzore @ Feb 27 2008, 10:31 AM)
yes right i do prefer the monster ultra to...but its to pricey la for me...3++ rm if i'm not mistaken right.. shakehead.gif  doh.gif
thats why i'm looking for HDT-S1283 or Tuniq Tower 120 this 2 cost around 1++ rm right... nod.gif
*
I no think is pricey for tis big monster ..bout Rm 260 drool.gif check here

115 Pages « < 52 53 54 55 56 > » Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0175sec    0.86    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 11th December 2025 - 08:04 PM