Im not sure myself but if it stresses it more why not ?

hmmm 4C less on core
2C more on NB compared than small fft 8k. i think it just stresses the NB and RAMs..

its not proc only...

hmm fast way to kill ure rams.. on 1min..

---

Added on February 8, 2008, 4:52 pmbut good stuff.. found out need 0.02v more on my NB

This post has been edited by cstkl1: Feb 8 2008, 04:52 PM

So what do you think ? 64k max fft yay nay ?

nay..
cause ure purpose is to stress ure proc.. first not ure rams.. or NB..

so 32k max or just leave it at 8k..

my two cents on the topic..

so if that's the case, i will opt for 32k instead of 8k. Bcoz i noticed that with 8k i can pass it easily.

err i dunno how much stress u want
err y not go or TAT..

if u pass that.. GOD will come down and bless u..kekeke although i dont think it supports penryn.

Tried TAT but i got error processor not supported. LOL

oh yeah TAT doesnt support my e2140 as well. Point to note..

I think my psu limits my oc for now as the voltages pumped are quite high eventho load volts are low and my gc is killing the psu too. If time permits i will retry to oc this baby with a new psu. *hopefully*

This post has been edited by uzairi: Feb 9 2008, 04:16 AM

hey uzairi get the new psu la pcp&c got selling now if i didnt own current psu i oredi grab it

This post has been edited by mfcm: Feb 9 2008, 07:28 AM

check ure 5v rail.

---

Added on February 9, 2008, 1:11 pmkeke i find it weird

unknown proc with no screenshot that broke the world record for 4ghz sp1m sold off to unknown person.. easily

my proc with better overclocking result hasnt..
weird..

lowyat admin should allow to have some music .. would play x-files..
unsolved mystery unless..err

This post has been edited by cstkl1: Feb 9 2008, 01:11 PM

No money la bro...

Im sure its the psu holding back my oc potential.

who's proc ?

-------edited--------

This post has been edited by cstkl1: Feb 9 2008, 06:04 PM

Bro cstkl1, now im using back my old proc E6300. To my surprise the default setting for small fft is min 8k max 64k back normal as usual. I suspect 32kb L1 cache x2... what do you think ?

same here

weird

plugged in a e6600 and i got back min 8k max 64 k also..

hmm dont trust orthos much nowadays
prefer prime but thats 15 minutes min 8k max 64

something is awefully flawed here..
cause i was testing with two versions of orthos.. have u noticed that with e8400 u always get core 0 failure while core 1 happily chugs along

usually my e6600 and e6850 either both fails.. or either one.. but never always the same core.

---

Added on February 12, 2008, 4:36 pmdude i found out something and its weird
if u get the older orthos version which u can choose each core..
and run on each no probs when u stress each core by itself

but when u run the 64k test on both.. problem..

hmm tested with a E6600 no issue..
but on e8400 there is..
interesting..


This post has been edited by cstkl1: Feb 12 2008, 04:36 PM

Yeah, interesting findings eh ? But i dont have the E8400 anymore so cant do any testings as for now.

I suppose the older sp2004 is better, just that we need to run 2x of it. 4x if you're using quad core procs, lol a bit troublesome if u ask me.

hi alll , just bought E8400 this afternoon

my batch is Q746A474, Running at 4.4Ghz at 1.45V , stable orthos running 3 hours and 30 minutes de still counting

3Dmarks 06

kewL man, really.. if only its was quad-cores, me also gonna get em'

not interested in dwi-teras anymore

u result was awesome

Good stuff
Where did you get it and what's the current price?

that batch all it lyn and digital mall.
how i know cause thats the one i bought for my friend..

yeah tested that on my friends UT in singapore last weekend
good stuff..



This post has been edited by cstkl1: Feb 13 2008, 12:17 AM