Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

7 Pages  1 2 3 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Intel Penryn Overclocking Thread, Toasting next gen 45nm babes ~

views
     
cstkl1
post Jan 28 2008, 11:48 AM

Look at all my stars!!
Group Icon
Elite
6,799 posts

Joined: Jan 2003

QUOTE(AoiNatsume @ Jan 28 2008, 09:39 AM)
So, anyone got these babes yet? Id say these chips has a huge oc potential, this is my currently result after owning this babe for 1 day, rough overclocking with no optimizing done yet, didn't have the time. Man.. i can get to get everything done drool.gif

user posted image

3.8Ghz at stock voltage shocking.gif
orthos passed 8 hours, i was still able to boot at 3.9Ghz, but failed at 2nd hour orthos.
C2D 45nm users, come in and share your thoughts thumbup.gif

Just to spice this thread up a little, ever wondered what exactly is Penryn? no, not the codename, the real PENRYN.
Taken from http://blogs.intel.com/technology/2007/04/penryn.php

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


A Little interesting fact on Intel's Codenames laugh.gif
*
post ure orthos priority 8 blend test or small fft ... min pass 1hour..
me suspect u did priority 1.. which is easy to pass...

wheres the screenies for the 8hours or two hours...??.. sorry with the no of BS that goes around LYN.. need to ask..
till then the claims is BS... in XS way..kekek

or just OCCT 30 minutes.. which runs at priority 8 blend also.


Added on January 28, 2008, 11:53 am
QUOTE(LExus65 @ Jan 28 2008, 11:44 AM)
nice result there with a little voltage bump and adequate cooling 4.5ghz should not be a problem i guess......

Aoi i tot u still continue with CF after goin to Dark side ??
*
and a better mobo.. too

This post has been edited by cstkl1: Jan 28 2008, 12:00 PM
cstkl1
post Jan 28 2008, 01:37 PM

Look at all my stars!!
Group Icon
Elite
6,799 posts

Joined: Jan 2003

current 24/7...lower NB voltages...
thats the idle.. load around 54C.

will try again for stable 4.5 with lower NB...

messing around with the GTL.

[attachmentid=388920]

dude whats ure batch??
hmm suspect same as mine.


This post has been edited by cstkl1: Jan 28 2008, 01:48 PM
cstkl1
post Jan 28 2008, 04:23 PM

Look at all my stars!!
Group Icon
Elite
6,799 posts

Joined: Jan 2003

uik .. no i didnt i was using set fsb to go higher and higher..

i loaded the cpu at 460fsb and that voltage...
and then kept going +10fsb higher till i occt showed stable..

give me another test.. and i can prove it to u...
heck i can even load at that no probs and run at that no probs.

would that satisfy u..
the core temp was loaded in the beginning to monitor the temps..
so thats y..
for what i lie..
u already know my proc can do 3dmark06 /3dmark05/aquamark sp32m at 4.5ghz but i couldnt do the OCCT cause temps were getting too high...

so thats y i lowered it..
sishh u ppl..

there was two test i was using OCCT/Orthos Priority 8 and memtest windows for NB/Ram. all aiming for 30 minutes pass..

core temp shows that lower mhz cause increased from there..

u can see the sp1m.. or u want me to do sp32m??

but to hit 4.5 need a lot of increase.. to 1.496v


Added on January 28, 2008, 4:31 pm
QUOTE(kucingfight @ Jan 28 2008, 04:12 PM)
fake screenies perhaps? ramped his OC jus after Orthos stable on stock speed  laugh.gif
*
only ppl like u would do such thing.

only difference with my proc is for 500fsb i need a lot of NB/PLL voltages.. which i still cannot overcome...yet..

will post some 3dmark06 for u...


This post has been edited by cstkl1: Jan 28 2008, 04:34 PM
cstkl1
post Jan 28 2008, 04:49 PM

Look at all my stars!!
Group Icon
Elite
6,799 posts

Joined: Jan 2003

QUOTE(clawhammer @ Jan 28 2008, 04:44 PM)
cstkl1, previously you mentioned in another thread to me that you got it at 4.5Ghz stable (in Hardware section). Perhaps you can base on that and show an Orthos/Prime screenshot?

It would be good to share the good stuff around smile.gif


Added on January 28, 2008, 4:47 pmBtw, if you update your FSB via software, it will still reflect accordingly in those applications. I'm not a detective to see if your screenshot is for real or fake but I'd like to see one so I could have some clue how to make mine do 4.5Ghz just like yours smile.gif

A screenshot of Orthos running for some time would be best.
*
nah it failed memtest windows just after 30 percent...
and i cannot do it now.. later at night need colder temps. my NB will be close to 80C if i do that now.


[attachmentid=389026]

and dont ask me y i bumped up 0.008v.. cause i strengten the transaction boost in bios from relax level to enable to boost 0.. happy

coming up soon with SP32m..

hmm should have take a pic of the post for the 3dmark06 to show u on the spot benchie.


This post has been edited by cstkl1: Jan 28 2008, 04:56 PM
cstkl1
post Jan 28 2008, 05:00 PM

Look at all my stars!!
Group Icon
Elite
6,799 posts

Joined: Jan 2003

yeah but orthos priority 1 and prime small fft ok...

but NB/PLL .. memtest windows ( hey u should try it really stresses the system equally to prime) ...

i dunno how u guys overclock but this is how i do it..

for cpu core - Prime95 custom small fft
once it passes 1-2 hours i am happy

but it failed memtest... like 30percent getting a lot of errors..
i tried my best with the NB/PLL voltage.. but no luck.. and it was too hot already..

but it was gameable with GOW ..which utilizes up 75 percent per core..


Added on January 28, 2008, 5:01 pm
QUOTE(clawhammer @ Jan 28 2008, 04:56 PM)
Ok, this is not 4.5Ghz anymore and if it failed any tests, it means it's not stable. Also, Super PI doesn't conclude stability. Previously you mention you had it 4.5Ghz daily stable which overwhelms me because I'm still working to get mine at that speed.

Well, good achievement but the tough part is to get it Orthos stable smile.gif
*
dude the sp32m just to prove there was no need for that hack job..from the time it takes to complete u can already judge.

from the time u can see..

can u do ure proc at this settings??.. put aside stability.. 3dmark06 etc at 1.408v 4.41ghz??

[attachmentid=389040]

[attachmentid=389040]

This post has been edited by cstkl1: Jan 28 2008, 05:07 PM
cstkl1
post Jan 28 2008, 05:09 PM

Look at all my stars!!
Group Icon
Elite
6,799 posts

Joined: Jan 2003

QUOTE(clawhammer @ Jan 28 2008, 04:56 PM)
Ok, this is not 4.5Ghz anymore and if it failed any tests, it means it's not stable. Also, Super PI doesn't conclude stability. Previously you mention you had it 4.5Ghz daily stable which overwhelms me because I'm still working to get mine at that speed.

Well, good achievement but the tough part is to get it Orthos stable smile.gif
*
orthos priority 6 easy
priority 9-10.. difficult..as this is almost 88-90% of TAT.

from the temps i suspect OCCT = orthos priority 7-8.. somewhere there..


This post has been edited by cstkl1: Jan 28 2008, 05:10 PM
cstkl1
post Jan 28 2008, 05:28 PM

Look at all my stars!!
Group Icon
Elite
6,799 posts

Joined: Jan 2003

QUOTE(clawhammer @ Jan 28 2008, 05:13 PM)
It doesn't concern me if someone does a hack job or not. If someone posts something not genuine, I'll just disregard it smile.gif At the same time, I doubt Super PI is used for that purpose. I'm not an OC detective and I believe the purpose of this thread is to get successful overclock results for the new 45nm so lets not mislead others.

If one can overclock to 4.5 or even 5.0 Ghz with Super PI screenshot, it's a good achivement but let's not confuse people by saying it's "24/7 stable". The other poor guy that doesn't know might think he's got a dud chip and start asking questions why he can't get his 4.5Ghz stable as well smile.gif

If it's not a stable OC, it isn't one irregardless. Even if I can pass Super PI, 3dmark and memtest but the moment I load my game, it hangs so the good result is nice to see but not enjoyable.


Added on January 28, 2008, 5:15 pmSome tests are easy to pass, some harder. For the same, there are different options in Super PI and passing 1M doesn't mean it passes 32M.

The Orthos tests people often talk about is either Small FFT or Blend. The others is a plus but either one above is good enough.
*
dude when i posted the 4.5 i thought i was stable..
then i tried to reduce the NB voltage.. and it failed
and the weir part when i leave it at auto it works which is far less than what i was pumping in.

thats y i suspect the nb/pll was faulty..
eventhough the 500 fsb pass a 4x8 for memtest..

thats y i reran it...
and it failed..
so until i do watercooling i cannot guarantee the bus..

3dmark cpu test 5 times run.

[attachmentid=389052]

i will run for u.. orthos blend or small fft.. later at night since u asked...
u can already see my Northbridge temps are freaking hot..
for 500fsb i need 1.8v or pll and northbridge.

how about i post some crysis benchies.. say increase it to 10 runs..

i am just posting all this since i was accused as a faker for the 4.4ghz
so just defending myself..

but for ure problem for games..
if u say it passes 3dmark sp32m.. and fail it games.. usually its not proc.. its ure NB/mem.
since games dont stress the cores much.
and did u know that CPU stress test on 3dmark on loop is equivalent to ORTHOS priority 8 basing on temps.

let me make it clear.. which i will post to ure hearts content later at night..
4.5ghz passed this
3dmark06
3dmark05
aquamark
sp1m
sp32m
OCCT 30 minutes
Prime 95 small fft 15 minutes

but failed memtest windows running two instantaneously 800mb each in 30 percent only and this was after i posted the remarks and benchies..


This post has been edited by cstkl1: Jan 28 2008, 05:34 PM
cstkl1
post Jan 28 2008, 05:39 PM

Look at all my stars!!
Group Icon
Elite
6,799 posts

Joined: Jan 2003

QUOTE(clawhammer @ Jan 28 2008, 05:33 PM)
Actually you're doing it for the community, not me smile.gif Please don't run it for me only laugh.gif As I say, 4.5Ghz Super PI is already good.
*
ok bro..
but dude.. did u test ure mems?? when u said ure game failed..
try memtest windows...
it will utilize most of ure mem...
so roughly u find a accuracy of 90-95percent for ure NB/PLL/Vdimm/Mem Timings stability with a 75 percent accuracy for ure core.. which is pretty good
since most games uses up to that much only.

cstkl1
post Jan 28 2008, 05:55 PM

Look at all my stars!!
Group Icon
Elite
6,799 posts

Joined: Jan 2003

QUOTE(clawhammer @ Jan 28 2008, 05:51 PM)
I just got it a few days ago, haven't started playing but from what I read, these new 45nm overclocks better on X38 than P35. I'm still unsure but will certainly keep everyone posted if I get something good going smile.gif
*
hmm but on p35 it uses less voltages on NB/PLL and u can achieve higher Bus speeds than X38..

check around i find all that whacked out bus ppl are doing are not on a x38..

cstkl1
post Jan 28 2008, 06:09 PM

Look at all my stars!!
Group Icon
Elite
6,799 posts

Joined: Jan 2003

QUOTE(clawhammer @ Jan 28 2008, 06:00 PM)
It's just what I've read and there are many folks with X38 on Xtreme Forums these days. I don't use dual graphics card so I'll stick with P35 until X38 board gets cheaper.
*
err i am also reporting from XS...
keke

see all the higher BUS.. are from p35's but the need more Vcore..which is a downside for equivalent GHZ as the X38
so i guess if ure for high GHZ go for the X38
but if ure want higher FSB go for the P35 mainly the P5k , Foxconn and abit Ip35pro

This post has been edited by cstkl1: Jan 28 2008, 06:11 PM
cstkl1
post Jan 28 2008, 06:51 PM

Look at all my stars!!
Group Icon
Elite
6,799 posts

Joined: Jan 2003

QUOTE(clawhammer @ Jan 28 2008, 06:44 PM)
I've had IP35-PRO and Foxconn MARS now biggrin.gif I'll let everyone knows but initially, MARS look very much more promising.
*
i had faster superpi result and 3dmark cpu scores on the mars..
just a bit compared to the maximus
but i think with the new bios 0907 on the maximus they are around the same already.

that is an awesome mobo.. so many silly ppl dont know how good that mobo is..
they keep saying that if they dont overlcock blah blah blah

but even at stock theres a difference in mem controllers/bios tweaking/cpu speeds...
and the foxconn p35 mars is one of the kings for such a marginal difference in price.


Added on January 28, 2008, 6:55 pmin a dillemma now..

kindda like the HIS hd3870 ICEq turbo..
or should i get a saphire HD3870x2 which i can get it tommorow..
hmmm

the HD3870X2 looks like has a lot of bugs etc...
and dont clock well...
dual bios interesting.

Saphire HD3870X2 - RM1550 ppl!!


This post has been edited by cstkl1: Jan 28 2008, 07:04 PM
cstkl1
post Jan 29 2008, 10:56 AM

Look at all my stars!!
Group Icon
Elite
6,799 posts

Joined: Jan 2003

QUOTE(AoiNatsume @ Jan 29 2008, 02:24 AM)
hey guys, any other 8400 users here? apparently im having some issues with my temps. The temperatures are flying sky high !!!, even on stock voltage, my load temp goes all the way up to 52c, now testing 1.3v @ 4.0Ghz, its climbing up to 63c. Im sure the TR 120eX(lapped) performs way better than this, tried reseating it many times, and checked the TIM, it is indeed evenly spreaded. Contact is definately not an issue here.

Now, the interesting part, upon touching the hsf directly while on load, reported temp on core temp / Everest is 63c, but.. the bloody hsf is freezing cold !!! 

this really is disappointing and is crippling my overclocking.
*
the tjunction is wrong..
i am very sure of it
cause with the e6850 when i hit 72C for a long time it will shut down..

but with e8400 it allows u to go right up to 80C..
so theres a error in the tjunction by 8-10C..

hence i follow the asus cpu temp with is 8-10C difference than core temp.

cstkl1
post Jan 29 2008, 11:06 AM

Look at all my stars!!
Group Icon
Elite
6,799 posts

Joined: Jan 2003

QUOTE(AoiNatsume @ Jan 29 2008, 12:22 AM)
alrighty, ran orthos on priority 8 small fft test more than 2 hours as requested my cstkl1 to prove that i was able to do 3.8Ghz in stock vcore =)
*
nice
and 4ghz at 1.3v??
try 1.28..



This post has been edited by cstkl1: Jan 29 2008, 11:07 AM
cstkl1
post Jan 29 2008, 01:34 PM

Look at all my stars!!
Group Icon
Elite
6,799 posts

Joined: Jan 2003

QUOTE(flatfinger @ Jan 29 2008, 12:35 PM)
for me totally weird....my cpu idling at 36'-38'.....core0 n core1 idling at 52-53 non -OC....somemore watercooling... sweat.gif

but using biostar hw monitor software ...the cpu at idle 25'...i dont know which one to refer... sweat.gif

user posted image
*
thats y just forget the temps..

i trust the coolit mtec controller which tells me the temps of the fluid in the freezone elite.


cstkl1
post Jan 29 2008, 06:09 PM

Look at all my stars!!
Group Icon
Elite
6,799 posts

Joined: Jan 2003

QUOTE(AoiNatsume @ Jan 29 2008, 02:37 PM)
hmm.. is there anywhere else that i can get a foxconn mars now? apparently lowyat plaza doesnt have any stocks at all.
*
ask darkscythe.

he is selling

cstkl1
post Jan 30 2008, 01:48 AM

Look at all my stars!!
Group Icon
Elite
6,799 posts

Joined: Jan 2003

QUOTE(clawhammer @ Jan 30 2008, 01:39 AM)
I even asked him and he re-affirm it was stable blush.gif
From what I see, many people manage to get into Windows at a high clock speed and do Super PI but not many manage to get it stable.
*
i cant..
i can show u orthos cpu small fft
but it will fail blend test.
memtest also fail now.

ive even lessen the ram performance level to 12 with CL5.. and still cannot.
it was gameable on GOW
but failed the new cpu benchmark on crysis...

ok it was a mistake..
so what u guys want me to bow down and ask for forgiveness.?? hmm.gif icon_question.gif notworthy.gif
pumped up the 4.4ghz vcore.. increased the performance levels on asus... .

and also getting a few bugs...
like now anything above 490-500fsb on multi 9 this is what happens..
when i press restart..
my comp will shutdown
and then only load.. signs of instability..

also second part weird about maximus x38..
if i up the NB/PLL voltages.. it will fail to restart..
and go back to default.. then i have to reset the nb to auto, change the fsb to something lower. let it restart and then only pump it back..


Added on January 30, 2008, 1:53 am
QUOTE(uzairi @ Jan 30 2008, 01:31 AM)
I lol'd!
*
QUOTE(clawhammer @ Jan 30 2008, 01:39 AM)
I even asked him and he re-affirm it was stable blush.gif
From what I see, many people manage to get into Windows at a high clock speed and do Super PI but not many manage to get it stable.
*
i dunno about u guys..
but i have been overclocking on this board with other c2d..
and the same principles dont apply...




This post has been edited by cstkl1: Jan 30 2008, 01:53 AM
cstkl1
post Jan 30 2008, 10:48 AM

Look at all my stars!!
Group Icon
Elite
6,799 posts

Joined: Jan 2003

this is the fastest 4 i can hit .
Performance Level 1.

Orthos Priority 9 Small FFT 8 hours run
[attachmentid=390293]

Sandra Score - 9332Mb's hmm cannot see the thing.. but thats written in GB's
[attachmentid=390295]

Aqumark3 - 242017
[attachmentid=390300]

3dmark01SE - 72922
[attachmentid=390312]

3dmark06 - 14250
[attachmentid=390307]



This post has been edited by cstkl1: Jan 30 2008, 11:24 AM
cstkl1
post Jan 30 2008, 10:57 AM

Look at all my stars!!
Group Icon
Elite
6,799 posts

Joined: Jan 2003

QUOTE(flatfinger @ Jan 30 2008, 10:53 AM)
its very gud already passed 8 hours at priority 9 thumbup.gif

but y different reading cpu speed at orthos n everest??
*
it will always detect the highest multi..


This post has been edited by cstkl1: Jan 30 2008, 10:58 AM
cstkl1
post Jan 30 2008, 11:09 AM

Look at all my stars!!
Group Icon
Elite
6,799 posts

Joined: Jan 2003

QUOTE(flatfinger @ Jan 30 2008, 11:00 AM)
ic...I will try to test it later..

Super Pi 1M @ 11.xxx s...which mean running at 4Ghz rite?? not 4.49Ghz like ur orthos reading...coz if u running at 4.49Ghz its like 10.xxx s of super pi 1M...

what's vcore feed in bios??
*
updated with aquamark and 3dmark score..
uploading results now as i run them..

dude if u can see that 4.5ghz y not look at the cpuid..
i used everest cause smaller than running 3 cpuz's..

cstkl1
post Jan 30 2008, 12:25 PM

Look at all my stars!!
Group Icon
Elite
6,799 posts

Joined: Jan 2003

QUOTE(clawhammer @ Jan 30 2008, 12:17 PM)
Hey guys, don't get this wrong. That E8400 is NOT 4.5Ghz stable smile.gif

If you look carefully, he is running 8 x 500. Orthos has a bug reporting the actual Mhz because it will always assume your multiplier as the default one (in this case 9x). It also means if you run 7.5 x 500 or 8 x 500, it will report as 4500Mhz (9 x 500) - try it yourself.

This justifies why:

1. It is so stable - because it's only 4Ghz anyway smile.gif
2. The Super PI score is 11.xx seconds (I manage to get 10.xx seconds)---BS

At the same time, I don't understand why he's posting without a CPU-Z screenshot hmm.gif
*
hmm sometime u baffle me..

cpuz i have to run 3.. ram. proc

but in one everest cpuid u get to see them all.--

dude..
i dunno what to say to u anymore..
especially when u ask y i ran everest CPUid...

errr duh smaller..??

and ure less than 11sec i call BS all the way...
post something if anything..

last post in the thread..wasting my time.

This post has been edited by cstkl1: Jan 30 2008, 12:53 PM

7 Pages  1 2 3 > » Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0328sec    0.32    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 11th December 2025 - 02:43 AM