Outline ·
[ Standard ] ·
Linear+
My own Home Theatre room setup, Finally, CHT-12R is here
|
TShtkaki
|
Apr 14 2008, 01:32 PM
|
|
QUOTE(megatron007 @ Apr 13 2008, 09:37 AM) HTKAKI AX200 vs HD65 AX200 win apa? lost apa HD65 win apa ? lost apa duno where can audition AX200... hmmmm I need not to reply. So fast, got pj kakis (or soon-to-be pj kakis) replying on behalf.
|
|
|
|
|
|
megatron007
|
Apr 14 2008, 02:36 PM
|
|
QUOTE(elmer @ Apr 14 2008, 10:12 AM) I bought my unit from musical image too. Great people there. I had an issue with my ax100 after using it for 100 hours and they swap it for me one-for-one with no questions ask. So if you really want to get the ax200, go get it from there! They are the main distributors too so they will be able to give you the best price. I think like they mention, if you got the money go for ax200. What convince me the most was this review: http://www.projectorcentral.com/panasonic_...r_projector.htmThe most remarkable feature of this projector to me is the outstanding rendition of 1080p film material from HD DVD and Blu-ray. The compression into 720p sacrifices surprisingly little detail. Quite honestly, the image at first glace looks as if it were coming from a 1080p projector. You do notice the lower resolution in white block letters of titles and credits, where edges are just a bit less precise than they are on a native 1080p projector. But for the most part, the video image itself looks very close to 1080p resolution. In addition to the excellent compression, the complete absence of pixel structure contributes to this impression. We can discern subtle differences only because we spend many hours looking at these products with the same test clips. But the typical consumer would have no problem believing the AX200U was a 1080p projector if they didn't know differently. The above is an excerpt from the review. Go read it. Projector central rated the projector 5 stars in every department. nice review but i guess my heart go with HD65 hope everythign smooth this week can get
|
|
|
|
|
|
TShtkaki
|
Apr 14 2008, 05:51 PM
|
|
yeah... all the best, bro Added on April 17, 2008, 9:19 amMore screenshots : DC Concert (courtesy of Megatron) :  Ghost Rider : This post has been edited by htkaki: Apr 17 2008, 09:19 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
megatron007
|
Apr 17 2008, 09:36 AM
|
|
taukeh....i guess u need to improve camera shooting skill dont ask me...i also pariah into this
|
|
|
|
|
|
rx330
|
Apr 17 2008, 09:49 AM
|
|
looks SD to me
|
|
|
|
|
|
megatron007
|
Apr 17 2008, 11:16 AM
|
|
i guess camera issue la
|
|
|
|
|
|
TShtkaki
|
Apr 17 2008, 12:01 PM
|
|
I am noob in this camera thing lah. Looks better in reality. Maybe, really need to use tripod and other setting
|
|
|
|
|
|
rx330
|
Apr 17 2008, 12:03 PM
|
|
blame the tripod eh
|
|
|
|
|
|
megatron007
|
Apr 17 2008, 01:36 PM
|
|
i also no tripod
so anjua snap photo for u all ??
|
|
|
|
|
|
TShtkaki
|
Apr 17 2008, 05:48 PM
|
|
QUOTE(rx330 @ Apr 17 2008, 12:03 PM) blame the tripod eh  ok, I admit. My photography skills s**ks big time  Added on April 21, 2008, 5:48 pmMore screenshots... hope tis time will be better   This post has been edited by htkaki: Apr 21 2008, 05:48 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
megatron007
|
Apr 21 2008, 10:48 PM
|
|
got improvement but ur carema product alot of "noise"
|
|
|
|
|
|
TShtkaki
|
Apr 21 2008, 10:51 PM
|
|
how to eliminate this? Dont tell me to use better camera such as SLR. Seldom use digicam. Maybe need to use 'nightshot' mode and adjust the shutter speed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
megatron007
|
Apr 21 2008, 11:29 PM
|
|
u gotta ask those gurus then hope tis week i can try to snap photo for u all also
|
|
|
|
|
|
TShtkaki
|
Apr 22 2008, 08:56 AM
|
|
Maybe sifu rx can help a bit on photography (not pornography, mind you) here
|
|
|
|
|
|
DigitalKL
|
Apr 22 2008, 09:05 AM
|
|
some cameras are more noisy than others. especially sony's. mine is cheap compact canon.....quite good!
what you can try is this -
1. freeze your dvd/BD player first 2. use a tripod - no tripod then use a make shift tripod like some boxes etc 3. set your camera's ISO to 100 or less 4. then take the shot
lesser ISO will be better but since its a dark room, you will need the tripod to steady everything
This post has been edited by DigitalKL: Apr 22 2008, 09:09 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
megatron007
|
Apr 22 2008, 09:07 AM
|
|
u see those picture they posted in AVforums
damm nice la
|
|
|
|
|
|
rx330
|
Apr 22 2008, 09:11 AM
|
|
hmmm, not pop enuff
|
|
|
|
|
|
abahwafi
|
Apr 22 2008, 09:13 AM
|
Getting Started

|
QUOTE(megatron007 @ Apr 21 2008, 10:48 PM) got improvement but ur carema product alot of "noise"  If it is really about noise, u need to use lower ISO setting (eg. 100). But if lowlight, lower ISO will make your camera adjust the shutter speed setting to slower also. Mean...tripod is mandatory.
|
|
|
|
|
|
megatron007
|
Apr 22 2008, 09:16 AM
|
|
nabeh
like tat i duno how to snap my picture also
headache liao
|
|
|
|
|
|
jasonlky
|
Apr 22 2008, 12:38 PM
|
|
QUOTE(rx330 @ Apr 22 2008, 09:11 AM) Actually for the asking price, the picture is OK. As for taking photos, in a fully darkened room, you are advised to use a tripod or some form of support no matter what ISO you use. As for me I prefer ISO 50, without flash (obviously) mounted on a tripod. I use the timer function (set at 2 seconds) to activate the shutter coz there must be zero vibration when the shutter is open... and the shutter will be open for an eternity..... 4-5 seconds. Jason This post has been edited by jasonlky: Apr 22 2008, 12:46 PM
|
|
|
|
|