never regret on your purchase... if u have passion in photography.. definitely getting dslr is a next step...
thevoip.. 1.2??
go for 18-200
What you can do, I can do also!, What's the big deal about DSLR Cameras?
|
|
Jan 17 2008, 12:54 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,139 posts Joined: Mar 2005 |
i think u have enough justification here to read..
never regret on your purchase... if u have passion in photography.. definitely getting dslr is a next step... thevoip.. 1.2?? go for 18-200 |
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 17 2008, 01:15 PM
|
|
VIP
11,883 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(TheVoIP @ Jan 17 2008, 11:38 AM) Hi brother darthbaboon, LOL. Indeed, I like the way you put it. I have to disagree with you that non-SLR can do what the SLR advantages. Here are few points that I can think of... which advantages go to SLR, and in most likely non-SLR like prosumer cannot do; + BIG camera attract attention of models in events. The bigger is always better. If they do not look at you, there is no eyes contact in your pictures. Same thing happen if there are a few photographers in a any event, let say wedding group pictures. People will tends to look at those BIG camera as they are the official one. + BIG camera feel more pro and will also drive you to better compose, play with setting like compensation and white balance. End Results -> Much better pictures. I see lots of prosumer camera people simply point and shoot. Even got nice scenery, it senget... + SLR can go very wide or very tele. All SLR can easily go way below 24mm equivalent. On full frame + sigmal 12-24 zoom, you can reach 12mm ultra-wide!!! Try doing that with any non-SLR camera. + BIG sensor on SLR with large aperture primes can lead to beautiful background blur. This is a no-no to any non-SLR camera. Refer to the picture on http://forum.lowyat.net/topic/612019 + Prosumer camera might offer high zoom range, but thier tele range image quality always sucks. I had seen from my ex-S2 IS and ex-S3 IS, there tele performance are suck compare to EF70-200 f2.8 or EF100-400 L. So in a way, prosumer paper spec might be good, but actual performance is another story. + Bigger sensor tends to have much better signal-to-noise ratio, which mean cleaner higher quality image. On my new 40D, I can easy shoot at ISO1600 and enjoy very low noise picture. Refer to http://forum.lowyat.net/topic/612019 on most of the ISO1600. Can you re-produce that clean result with your prosumer? + BIG camera plus some L lenses also make you happy and proud for some stupid reasons. Hope my words make a sense or two... To me, DSLRs have one major advantage, that is the Bad @ss factor. QUOTE(TheVoIP @ Jan 17 2008, 11:38 AM) Boost our economy? Not boost Japan's economy and make our ringgit value worse if we buy Canon or Nikon? QUOTE(TheVoIP @ Jan 17 2008, 11:38 AM) + Sometime with BIG camera, you are allowed to enter media section for some events. Without the right spot, it will be worthless on how good your camera is. Hmm. I've never tried this before. You tried before? And will they give you a media pass just by looking at the DSLR?This post has been edited by shockk: Jan 17 2008, 01:16 PM |
|
|
Jan 17 2008, 02:03 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,793 posts Joined: Feb 2005 From: Command & Conquer 3 |
QUOTE(shockk @ Jan 17 2008, 01:15 PM) LOL. Indeed, I like the way you put it. Yo... Glad some one is human enought to understand my statements... To me, DSLRs have one major advantage, that is the Bad @ss factor. Sometime the advantages of using SLR is hard to explain via words and pure logics. Some time it need no reasons. It is more like having fun. Sometime I also see people shooting with 300 f2.8 for potrait or fashion, which actually I think no need one la... But siok la.. BIG ma... |
|
|
Jan 17 2008, 02:09 PM
|
|
Staff
7,529 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(TheVoIP @ Jan 17 2008, 02:03 PM) Yo... Glad some one is human enought to understand my statements... have you even seen in one event, the models are only 5-6 meters infront of you, and suddenly one guy popped up beside you and use a Nikkor 300mm/2.8 to shoot? lol.Sometime the advantages of using SLR is hard to explain via words and pure logics. Some time it need no reasons. It is more like having fun. Sometime I also see people shooting with 300 f2.8 for potrait or fashion, which actually I think no need one la... But siok la.. BIG ma... that time it was damn hilarious and when i found out, he just bought the 300mm... BIG ma.. shiok |
|
|
Jan 17 2008, 02:16 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,109 posts Joined: Oct 2007 |
QUOTE(shockk @ Jan 17 2008, 01:15 PM) LOL. Indeed, I like the way you put it. hehe. i've tried once..but on different situation. at particular event, i'm try to find out whose the performer on the stage. but everyone blocking my view. then i'm put out my dslr..and everyone gimme their way To me, DSLRs have one major advantage, that is the Bad @ss factor. Boost our economy? Not boost Japan's economy and make our ringgit value worse if we buy Canon or Nikon? Hmm. I've never tried this before. You tried before? And will they give you a media pass just by looking at the DSLR? |
|
|
Jan 17 2008, 02:17 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,793 posts Joined: Feb 2005 From: Command & Conquer 3 |
QUOTE(nairud @ Jan 17 2008, 02:09 PM) have you even seen in one event, the models are only 5-6 meters infront of you, and suddenly one guy popped up beside you and use a Nikkor 300mm/2.8 to shoot? lol. Yeah... I often see that... Normal people cannot understand from the point of logic... because it does not make sense after all.that time it was damn hilarious and when i found out, he just bought the 300mm... BIG ma.. shiok But sometime logic does not matter... Happy... Having Fun... Smile... Laught... Hahaha... and that's what matter... This post has been edited by TheVoIP: Jan 17 2008, 02:22 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 17 2008, 02:47 PM
|
|
VIP
11,883 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(fcbarcelona-my @ Jan 17 2008, 02:16 PM) hehe. i've tried once..but on different situation. at particular event, i'm try to find out whose the performer on the stage. but everyone blocking my view. then i'm put out my dslr..and everyone gimme their way LOL. cool. Oh yeah. Now reminded me. I was trying to get some food shots at the counter at Jogoya KL, then when people saw my dslr with L lense(fren's one), they all give way and smiled after I took the photos. .. --Priceless.-- |
|
|
Jan 17 2008, 04:21 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,063 posts Joined: May 2005 From: Tatooine |
QUOTE(TheVoIP @ Jan 17 2008, 11:38 AM) + BIG camera attract attention of models in events. The bigger is always better. If they do not look at you, there is no eyes contact in your pictures. Same thing happen if there are a few photographers in a any event, let say wedding group pictures. People will tends to look at those BIG camera as they are the official one. + Sometime with BIG camera, you are allowed to enter media section for some events. Without the right spot, it will be worthless on how good your camera is. + BIG camera plus some L lenses also make you happy and proud for some stupid reasons. Hope my words make a sense or two... Btw quick question to save me some precious time going through the thick manual : I) Bro Burgaflippinman mentioned "There is a meter telling you whether you shot would be correctly exposed or not." Where's this located? II) How to activate Liveview? Does D40X have it? Any histogram for this liveview? Cheers! |
|
|
Jan 17 2008, 04:32 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,793 posts Joined: Feb 2005 From: Command & Conquer 3 |
QUOTE(shockk @ Jan 17 2008, 02:47 PM) Oh yeah. Now reminded me. I was trying to get some food shots at the counter at Jogoya KL, then when people saw my dslr with L lense(fren's one), they all give way and smiled after I took the photos. .. --Priceless.-- Yeah... Happy to know that more people agree with my nuts teory on SLR advantages... QUOTE(darthbaboon @ Jan 17 2008, 04:21 PM) I love your reasoning bro... "There is a meter telling you whether you shot would be correctly exposed or not" -> It does not matter. Most of my shots are done in AV/TV mode where the exposure should be ok based on the camera evaluation. If not, compensate accordingly like 1/3 brighter etc.... Sometime even the exposure meter level indicate meaningless in fully manual mode. I prefer to look at the LCD playback to know if the result on or not on. After all, why not use digital camera in the digital way?Btw quick question to save me some precious time going through the thick manual : I) Bro Burgaflippinman mentioned "There is a meter telling you whether you shot would be correctly exposed or not." Where's this located? II) How to activate Liveview? Does D40X have it? Any histogram for this liveview? Cheers! "How to activate Liveview?" I was helping my neighbour D40 because he cannot autofocus with his new 50 f1.8, which later realise the camera has no autofocusing motor inside... Ma Le... But if my memory are reliable, I did not see Liveview option there... It is either the function is not there or Nikon using other name. By the way, I can confirm the new D300 got live view, because I was shooting with some other photographer in wedding events. Live view very useful in those "yam seng" shots where you just need to lift up your camera high high and look at the LCD... Hahah... |
|
|
Jan 17 2008, 04:42 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,967 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: somewhere, far far away |
QUOTE(darthbaboon @ Jan 17 2008, 04:21 PM) I love your reasoning bro... I) dunno about D40 but on the 350D/400D is in the view finder, you see something like this here, the last set of picture label 3. For canon a small line will blip on top, when it's in the middle, its correctly expose, not sure how it's on a nikon.Btw quick question to save me some precious time going through the thick manual : I) Bro Burgaflippinman mentioned "There is a meter telling you whether you shot would be correctly exposed or not." Where's this located? II) How to activate Liveview? Does D40X have it? Any histogram for this liveview? Cheers! Dslr metering is actually pretty accurate if you know how to get the correct exposure, for that it's better if you read the book "Understanding Exposure" by Bryan Peterson, very nice II) don't think the D40X have live view since the more expensive D80 also don't have, D300 have it loh. you should be able to view the histogram when reviewing you photos in playback mode |
|
|
Jan 17 2008, 04:46 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
499 posts Joined: Dec 2007 |
I do feel... malu, when taking photos using my small normal digicam beside those who use SLR/DSLR. xD
Shy shy = less confidence = photo also lousy |
|
|
Jan 17 2008, 05:04 PM
|
|
Staff
7,529 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(darthbaboon @ Jan 17 2008, 04:21 PM) I love your reasoning bro... I)And here's the prob, RTFM.Btw quick question to save me some precious time going through the thick manual : I) Bro Burgaflippinman mentioned "There is a meter telling you whether you shot would be correctly exposed or not." Where's this located? II) How to activate Liveview? Does D40X have it? Any histogram for this liveview? Cheers! II) Want liveview? Buy D300, rm5.7k |
|
|
Jan 17 2008, 05:17 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,063 posts Joined: May 2005 From: Tatooine |
QUOTE(nairud @ Jan 17 2008, 05:04 PM) Well if we all had time (and possibly attention span) to read and digest thick manuals/guides/self-help books this world will be an uthopian theme park, a lot of instructors/teachers/counselors/shrinks will be out of a job and there'd prolly be world peace and an end to world poverty, hunger and illiteracy at last. RM 5.7k for liveview and even more mysterious buttons and functions..... *run for your life!* |
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 17 2008, 05:27 PM
|
|
Staff
7,529 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(darthbaboon @ Jan 17 2008, 05:17 PM) Well if we all had time (and possibly attention span) to read and digest thick manuals/guides/self-help books this world will be an uthopian theme park, a lot of instructors/teachers/counselors/shrinks will be out of a job and there'd prolly be world peace and an end to world poverty, hunger and illiteracy at last. All it takes is a little effort to find out how your D40x works or generally how all DSLR work which you wouldn't have come here whining about it telling ppl how come S3 can show you whether it's underexposed or overexposed while D40x cant. Rite?RM 5.7k for liveview and even more mysterious buttons and functions..... *run for your life!* No. 7 is your electronic meter that tells you whether the picture is under or overexposed when you look thru your VIEWFINDER. ![]() Added on January 17, 2008, 5:32 pmI noticed that you're joining the Birding outing. good luck This post has been edited by nairud: Jan 17 2008, 05:32 PM |
|
|
Jan 17 2008, 05:41 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,793 posts Joined: Feb 2005 From: Command & Conquer 3 |
QUOTE(Intimidated @ Jan 17 2008, 04:46 PM) I do feel... malu, when taking photos using my small normal digicam beside those who use SLR/DSLR. xD Yeah... At least you admit it.Shy shy = less confidence = photo also lousy It is why I see people who has limited budget, but still buying high-end camera (but older model la) like Nikon D1 as well as Canon EOS 1D. At least those bigger camera really make one feel more confortable in those events... And it is also why I ask people try not to buy entry level camera like Nikon D40 and Canon 400D because they are too small la... No styles... Tak ada gaya... And to make it related to the original topic, tiny prosumer camera lagi teruk la.... Imagine if you dare to use a compact IXUS camera while others around with BIG SLR + BIG looking flash gun to shoot.... LOL... Personally, I do not like to use flash in my photo... But I still mount the BIG flash gun on my camera... just for the SIZE issue.... |
|
|
Jan 17 2008, 05:47 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,063 posts Joined: May 2005 From: Tatooine |
QUOTE(nairud @ Jan 17 2008, 05:27 PM) All it takes is a little effort to find out how your D40x works or generally how all DSLR work which you wouldn't have come here whining about it telling ppl how come S3 can show you whether it's underexposed or overexposed while D40x cant. Rite? Thank you. I apologize if you or anyone felt offended by my ignorance through this post. But I am honest enough to admit that I've learnt much from all the postings and help you guys have provided... much more than if I had RTFM (or attempted to do so).No. 7 is your electronic meter that tells you whether the picture is under or overexposed when you look thru your VIEWFINDER. Added on January 17, 2008, 5:32 pmI noticed that you're joining the Birding outing. good luck The transition to SLR from PnS or prosumer isn't gonna be an easy one, but it helps to know that I'm not the only one frustrated at the buttons and functions landslide. This post has been edited by darthbaboon: Jan 17 2008, 05:47 PM |
|
|
Jan 17 2008, 05:48 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,533 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Kuala Lumpur |
QUOTE(TheVoIP @ Jan 17 2008, 05:41 PM) And to make it related to the original topic, tiny prosumer camera lagi teruk la.... Imagine if you dare to use a compact IXUS camera while others around with BIG SLR + BIG looking flash gun to shoot.... LOL... The shutter sound of SLR will blanket the puny 'chi chak' sound by PnS Added on January 17, 2008, 5:49 pm QUOTE(darthbaboon @ Jan 17 2008, 05:47 PM) The transition to SLR from PnS or prosumer isn't gonna be an easy one, but it helps to know that I'm not the only one frustrated at the buttons and functions landslide. It takes time to make transition, mate..I jumped from Sony W1 to Canon 40D and it takes a while to get the flow of it.. This post has been edited by goliath: Jan 17 2008, 05:49 PM |
|
|
Jan 17 2008, 05:54 PM
|
|
Elite
7,826 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
In regards to the metering, I am sure you should be able to find out more about it.
Here is a quick guide, when you look through the viewfinder you will see a meter as shown below. 0 + ----- | ----- - So if you point your camera at a subject, and you get this, 0 + --||||| ----- - It means your image will be overexposed and you need to either increase your shutter speed or reduce your aperture opening. If you point your camera at a subject, and you get this, 0 + ----- | ||||- It means your image will be underexposed and you need to either reduce your shutter speed or increase your aperture opening or increase your ISO setting. If you set your camera at Av mode or Shutter Priority or auto or program mode, it will automatically help you adjust but an auto adjustment might not suit your taste. This post has been edited by Mavik: Jan 17 2008, 05:55 PM |
|
|
Jan 17 2008, 05:56 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,793 posts Joined: Feb 2005 From: Command & Conquer 3 |
As I had expressed in my previous numerous posts that SIZE matter... Always go as BIG as possible... When yours is BIG (White lense, 300 f2.8 etc), you never shy to show... And on the other way, small things tends to be embrassed.
These teory works on a lot of things; Camry, Accord is much better than Kelisa and Kancil.... S class is better than C class... Even kids that do not know the price of the cars can understand that... Even our politician admit that some AV video was him, all because his size is OK and want to tunjuk. Imagine if yours is small, being captured in video, and watch by others... Do you want to admit it is actually yours? Hope my words can help in opening your mind to understanding the important of dSLR so you are not regreting getting one. If you want to regret, only regret yours are not big enought, and should get bigger one... Remember BIG is always Better.... LOOOONG also good. BIG + LONG = VERY GOOD! This post has been edited by TheVoIP: Jan 17 2008, 05:58 PM |
|
|
Jan 17 2008, 06:03 PM
|
|
Elite
7,826 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(TheVoIP @ Jan 17 2008, 05:56 PM) As I had expressed in my previous numerous posts that SIZE matter... Always go as BIG as possible... When yours is BIG (White lense, 300 f2.8 etc), you never shy to show... And on the other way, small things tends to be embrassed. Well SIZE matter but not in all occasions and once you do more and more long hours and event sort of photography, you really wished size doesn't matter! These teory works on a lot of things; Camry, Accord is much better than Kelisa and Kancil.... S class is better than C class... Even kids that do not know the price of the cars can understand that... Even our politician admit that some AV video was him, all because his size is OK and want to tunjuk. Imagine if yours is small, being captured in video, and watch by others... Do you want to admit it is actually yours? Hope my words can help in opening your mind to understanding the important of dSLR so you are not regreting getting one. If you want to regret, only regret yours are not big enought, and should get bigger one... Remember BIG is always Better.... LOOOONG also good. BIG + LONG = VERY GOOD! Try carrying two bodies, with a belt and a assortment of 85mm f/1.2, 70-200mm, 10-22mm, fish eye, two flash on the bodies, memory card, water bottle and run around for about 8-12 hours then I am very sure you would be saying that SIZE matters. With your comparison about Mercedes between an S class and a C class, is the SLR worse off compared to the C class since the C class is bigger? Would the BMW Z4 lose to a Wira because the Z4 is smaller. Do you consider a F18 jet compared to a fokker quad properlor plane lousy because the F18 is smaller. It doesn't matter if your brain is soooo huge, if we don't even use its full capacity it doesn't even matter. Don't look at size, look at quality. |
| Change to: | 0.0263sec
0.30
6 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 15th December 2025 - 03:55 AM |