Determine your C2D is overclockable or not, CPU right mark
|
|
 Dec 21 2007, 12:11 PM
|
 
Senior Member
1,988 posts Joined: Aug 2005 From: Puchong, Selangor   
|
QUOTE(sHawTY @ Dec 21 2007, 10:38 AM) Oh wait, now that thing stops me from buying the board. Go Mars...  Aaaa. What board should i go for now, i really really need a new board to replace mine, got really tired with this f*cked up IP35-E.    just got mine... |
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 21 2007, 01:12 PM
|
All Stars
14,908 posts Joined: Jul 2005 
|
QUOTE(IcEMoCHa @ Dec 21 2007, 12:11 PM) Go Mars... Mars doesn't have the third PCI-e X16 slot. just got mine...If it has, i would have it by my hands now.  |
|
|
Dec 21 2007, 01:39 PM
|
Senior Member
2,471 posts Joined: Jan 2003 
|
QUOTE(IcEMoCHa @ Dec 21 2007, 12:11 PM) Go Mars... we're waiting for your oc result just got mine... |
|
|
Dec 21 2007, 01:59 PM
|
Senior Member
964 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Ipoh/Penang
|
"the lower value for Maximal req. Vcore mean the proc is more overclockable"...
Hmmm..Conroe and Kentfield vcore if compare to Merom....Merom the lowest Vcore...Does that mean merom proc can clock higher? |
|
|
Dec 21 2007, 04:08 PM
|
Senior Member
1,561 posts Joined: Feb 2006 From: Penang island
|
QUOTE(sHawTY @ Dec 21 2007, 01:12 PM) Mars doesn't have the third PCI-e X16 slot. dfi x38 If it has, i would have it by my hands now.  it has 3 pci-e x16 slot |
|
|
Dec 21 2007, 04:11 PM
|
|
Senior Member
2,471 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
QUOTE(kinwai88 @ Dec 21 2007, 01:59 PM) "the lower value for Maximal req. Vcore mean the proc is more overclockable"... not sure if it apply to laptop proc too Hmmm..Conroe and Kentfield vcore if compare to Merom....Merom the lowest Vcore...Does that mean merom proc can clock higher? |
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 21 2007, 04:17 PM
|
Senior Member
673 posts Joined: Dec 2007
|
here's my e6600
 
|
|
|
Dec 21 2007, 07:37 PM
|
Senior Member
1,972 posts Joined: Oct 2006 From: Seberang Perai
|
QUOTE(Without @ Dec 20 2007, 06:22 PM) your idle temp 14c? me and gsan temp is lower like 14C-15Cit is bcoz we are using ES... I think gsan using ES too... |
|
|
Dec 21 2007, 08:23 PM
|
|
Senior Member
673 posts Joined: Dec 2007
|
QUOTE(cschun86 @ Dec 21 2007, 08:37 PM) me and gsan temp is lower like 14C-15C ES processor cannot show the accurate temp..it is bcoz we are using ES... I think gsan using ES too... |
|
|
Dec 21 2007, 08:50 PM
|
Senior Member
7,173 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: PCH
|
n00b in action...
 |
|
|
Dec 21 2007, 10:03 PM
|
|
Senior Member
673 posts Joined: Dec 2007
|
sniper69: wonder you got apply thermal paste?? =.="
the temp quite high.. |
|
|
Dec 21 2007, 10:08 PM
|
|
All Stars
14,908 posts Joined: Jul 2005
|
QUOTE(kinwai88 @ Dec 21 2007, 01:59 PM) Does that mean merom proc can clock higher? No.That's because laptop processors are made to use low vcores. Sometime it uses half of the vcore compared to desktop processors. That doesn't meant it will perform well in overclocking. |
|
|
Dec 22 2007, 12:25 AM
|
|
All Stars
14,908 posts Joined: Jul 2005
|
5 minutes ago, i raised FSB to 450MHz but the multiplier stays at 8, and guess what, the "Maximal Requested Vcore" still stay on 1.250V.
 PS: 450MHz [Bus Speed] X 8 [Multiplier] = 3.6GHz [Clockspeed] @ 1800MHz [Rated FSB] Sadly, i forgot to take the screenshot. My system is not stable though, didn't play with the vcore hard enough to find either my system is stable or not.  |
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 22 2007, 01:28 AM
|
|
Senior Member
2,471 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
QUOTE(sHawTY @ Dec 22 2007, 12:25 AM) 5 minutes ago, i raised FSB to 450MHz but the multiplier stays at 8, and guess what, the "Maximal Requested Vcore" still stay on 1.250V. I think the maximal req. vcore is still remain no matter what speed you are running. actually the theory is very simple, let say for E6750, default speed is 2.66GHz with maximal req. vcore is 1.250v only, so it still can go more higher as there is a distance to pump up the vcore, compare to other E6750 which the maximal req. vcore is more than 1.250v, eg 1.350v PS: 450MHz [Bus Speed] X 8 [Multiplier] = 3.6GHz [Clockspeed] @ 1800MHz [Rated FSB] Sadly, i forgot to take the screenshot. My system is not stable though, didn't play with the vcore hard enough to find either my system is stable or not. |
|
|
Dec 22 2007, 01:30 AM
|
|
All Stars
14,908 posts Joined: Jul 2005
|
QUOTE(gsan @ Dec 22 2007, 01:28 AM) I think the maximal req. vcore is still remain no matter what speed you are running. actually the theory is very simple, let say for E6750, default speed is 2.66GHz with maximal req. vcore is 1.250v only, so it still can go more higher as there is a distance to pump up the vcore, compare to other E6750 which the maximal req. vcore is more than 1.250v, eg 1.350v Does that mean i can go alot higher with my Q6600 G0?  This post has been edited by sHawTY: Dec 22 2007, 05:19 AM |
|
|
Dec 22 2007, 01:51 AM
|
|
Senior Member
2,471 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
QUOTE(sHawTY @ Dec 22 2007, 01:30 AM) Does that mean i can alot higher with my Q6600 G0? that's what I wonder |
|
|
Dec 22 2007, 11:58 PM
|
All Stars
10,688 posts Joined: Jan 2005
|
rookie in action..
Attached thumbnail(s) 
|
|
|
Dec 23 2007, 12:00 AM
|
|
Senior Member
7,173 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: PCH
|
humang aii... such a low VID there...
 ... |
|
|
Dec 23 2007, 12:10 AM
|
|
All Stars
14,908 posts Joined: Jul 2005
|
QUOTE(sniper69 @ Dec 23 2007, 12:00 AM) humang aii... such a low VID there... Low? ...Beat this: A Q6600 G0 with a VID of 1.2000V  |
|
|
Dec 23 2007, 12:13 AM
|
|
All Stars
10,688 posts Joined: Jan 2005
|
QUOTE(sHawTY @ Dec 23 2007, 12:10 AM) Low? w00t.. lower than mine Beat this: A Q6600 G0 with a VID of 1.2000V [img] btw, izzit stable enough?   |
| Change to: |  0.0155sec
 0.71
 6 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 30th November 2025 - 06:14 PM |
Quote