Determine your C2D is overclockable or not, CPU right mark
|
|
 Jan 9 2008, 09:40 PM
|
 
Senior Member
937 posts Joined: Jun 2006 From: Malaysia   
|
QUOTE(GRexer @ Jan 9 2008, 07:36 PM) I actually don't think the VID has anything to do with overclockability overally. It only means there's a higher chance of the processor being able to clock higher with less voltage as it started off to be stable at the same speed across the same processors with less voltage. Agree with u bro GRexer...but why with the different VID?Different batch or what?   |
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 9 2008, 11:41 PM
|
 
Elite
4,746 posts Joined: Dec 2007 From: Speed rule
|
I have 1 1.3v(Bios default and lowest) E6550.Get it up to 420fsb on intel capalak G33,22hrs OCCT stable.Now going into other people IP35E,see can go 460(Stock cooler,KVR Hynix pair) stable or not
 |
|
|
Jan 10 2008, 11:30 AM
|
 
VIP
3,815 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Kuala Lumpur  
|
QUOTE(Izwan898 @ Jan 9 2008, 09:40 PM) Agree with u bro GRexer...but why with the different VID?Different batch or what? It's most probably from different batch as it comes from different wafer, the only thing VID shows is that your processor can be ran stablely at stock speed at a lower voltage, that's all, not really a guaranteed better overclocking chip, it might not like high voltages, or maybe need high voltage to run at a higher speed(which might be why it's binned to be a lower speed processor instead also) |
|
|
Jan 14 2008, 02:55 PM
|
Senior Member
3,175 posts Joined: May 2006
|
QUOTE(GRexer @ Jan 10 2008, 11:30 AM) It's most probably from different batch as it comes from different wafer, the only thing VID shows is that your processor can be ran stablely at stock speed at a lower voltage, that's all, not really a guaranteed better overclocking chip, it might not like high voltages, or maybe need high voltage to run at a higher speed(which might be why it's binned to be a lower speed processor instead also) @bolded partyeah, i think you just maybe right. because u see my e2140 is at 1.325v, but then it can stably oced to 3.4ghz with 1.45v where as some e2140 with a vid of 1.25v like a friend of mines, can barely do even 3ghz with 1.5v This post has been edited by bryanyeo87: Jan 14 2008, 02:57 PM |
|
|
Jan 15 2008, 12:39 AM
|
Senior Member
662 posts Joined: Mar 2006
|
This is my Screenshot...
Any comments?? Also, i'm using shitty INTEL HSF Stock... [attachmentid=379599] |
|
|
Jan 15 2008, 12:59 AM
|
Senior Member
7,173 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: PCH
|
damn nice... 1.2375 VID
 |
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 15 2008, 01:31 AM
|
|
Senior Member
937 posts Joined: Jun 2006 From: Malaysia
|
Nice...low vcore but don't say shitty Intel Stock HSF...makes me sad coz I'm using it rite now too...haha
 |
|
|
Jan 15 2008, 08:08 AM
|
Senior Member
542 posts Joined: Jul 2006
|
i wonder can intel cure 2 duo T7300 clockable??? is a lappy processor though
|
|
|
Jan 15 2008, 05:41 PM
|
Senior Member
2,471 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
QUOTE(bernardryan @ Jan 15 2008, 12:39 AM) This is my Screenshot... nice quad core u got there Any comments?? Also, i'm using shitty INTEL HSF Stock... try to overclock  |
|
|
Jan 20 2008, 12:24 PM
|
Junior Member
506 posts Joined: Mar 2006 From: New Eden
|
My e6750 screeny..
Manage to pump it up to 3.7ghz & its stable...  |
|
|
Jan 20 2008, 12:27 PM
|
|
Senior Member
2,471 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
QUOTE(convicted_knight @ Jan 20 2008, 12:24 PM) My e6750 screeny.. nice bro Manage to pump it up to 3.7ghz & its stable... btw, is it prime stable? |
|
|
Jan 20 2008, 12:29 PM
|
Senior Member
4,810 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
the VID seems nothing to do with ocbility.
i've seen someone with lower VID than mine but still cant oc much. |
|
|
Jan 20 2008, 04:10 PM
|
|
Elite
4,746 posts Joined: Dec 2007 From: Speed rule
|
Nice E6750 you got there.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 21 2008, 07:53 AM
|
|
Junior Member
506 posts Joined: Mar 2006 From: New Eden
|
QUOTE(gsan @ Jan 20 2008, 12:27 PM) nice bro Hmm. Prime.. havent try it yet... btw, is it prime stable?  |
|
|
Jan 21 2008, 08:13 AM
|
|
Senior Member
7,173 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: PCH
|
@knight
nice one, indeed @sukhoi37 from what i see is, it's not about highly overclocking thingy (it is though...) but, it's about how our processor need such voltage @ certain speed... for example, it's better right 3.6GHz @1.3000VCore than 3.6GHz @1.4500VCore?, say the Maximal VID is 1.4500, and in order to run 3.6GHz stable, we need to pump @1.5VCore (for example), i mean... it'll more lovely if got a processor with Maximal VID @1.2750 - you get what i mean? anyway, just my simple theory... me myself could be wrong though...   |
|
|
Jan 21 2008, 11:31 AM
|
|
Senior Member
4,810 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
QUOTE(sniper69 @ Jan 21 2008, 08:13 AM) @knight but the problem is that i've seen someone with lower VID but needs higher vcore to achieve 3.6ghz.nice one, indeed @sukhoi37 from what i see is, it's not about highly overclocking thingy (it is though...) but, it's about how our processor need such voltage @ certain speed... for example, it's better right 3.6GHz @1.3000VCore than 3.6GHz @1.4500VCore?, say the Maximal VID is 1.4500, and in order to run 3.6GHz stable, we need to pump @1.5VCore (for example), i mean... it'll more lovely if got a processor with Maximal VID @1.2750 - you get what i mean? anyway, just my simple theory... me myself could be wrong though... he's using identical mobo (IP35-Pro) with me. |
|
|
Jan 21 2008, 10:05 PM
|
|
Junior Member
506 posts Joined: Mar 2006 From: New Eden
|
@gsan,
Whats the diffrent between orthos and prime..? its look the same to me..  3.7ghz overnite orthosed... |
|
|
Jan 21 2008, 11:00 PM
|
|
Senior Member
7,173 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: PCH
|
QUOTE(sukhoi37 @ Jan 21 2008, 11:31 AM) but the problem is that i've seen someone with lower VID but needs higher vcore to achieve 3.6ghz. he's using identical mobo (IP35-Pro) with me. , aiyak... i guess i'm wrong then, or probably he's the one that not so lucky  ? QUOTE(convicted_knight @ Jan 21 2008, 10:05 PM) @gsan, Whats the diffrent between orthos and prime..? its look the same to me.. 3.7ghz overnite orthosed... ... your CPUz blocked by that SP2004 le..., show us the whole thing...AFAIK, SP2004 would detect as maximum multiplier even though you already use lower multiplier  |
|
|
Jan 21 2008, 11:13 PM
|
|
Junior Member
506 posts Joined: Mar 2006 From: New Eden
|
sorry.. aiyo.. kat orthoz tu kan ader tulis 3704mhz... 3.7ghz kan...?
Q&A: 1. there is a beta ver. for multicore... it is good? 2. izzit normal to have difrent vcore during idle n during load..? ie: my 3.7ghz screeny shows 1.392v but during idle 1.44v (1.48125v in bios) |
|
|
Jan 21 2008, 11:33 PM
|
|
Senior Member
7,173 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: PCH
|
QUOTE(convicted_knight @ Jan 21 2008, 11:13 PM) sorry.. aiyo.. kat orthoz tu kan ader tulis 3704mhz... 3.7ghz kan...? 1. ??? not sure...Q&A: 1. there is a beta ver. for multicore... it is good? 2. izzit normal to have difrent vcore during idle n during load..? ie: my 3.7ghz screeny shows 1.392v but during idle 1.44v (1.48125v in bios) 2. that's what we called vdrop |
| Change to: |  0.0341sec
 0.39
 6 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 1st December 2025 - 09:09 AM |
Quote