Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Solution to solve UEC senang je

views
     
angelgemini
post Dec 12 2025, 10:07 PM

...
******
Senior Member
1,751 posts

Joined: Jun 2005
From: Malaysia


QUOTE(mick84 @ Dec 12 2025, 10:03 PM)
MoE assign malay teacher sjkc... cina buat bising pulak.. just recent news.
I pun tak faham why...
*
malay teacher don't mean student understand malay.

even SK malay also can be bad, which full of malay teacher.


the whole issue is, the interest of student to study it.


what MOE need, to get people interest to study it and not force down into stomach.

how to do that, that MOE job.

fail to done it = their failure.
seather
post Dec 12 2025, 10:08 PM

xXxXxXxXx
******
Senior Member
1,335 posts

Joined: Nov 2004


as i keep repeating, the best way to kill UEC is to streamline the entry into public uni...

merge STPM, Matrik, Uni Asasi into one....

entry based on merit, with tongkat given based on socioeconomic situation, no pure racial quote..

but which malay politician get balls to take away the racial tongkat?
seather
post Dec 12 2025, 10:10 PM

xXxXxXxXx
******
Senior Member
1,335 posts

Joined: Nov 2004


QUOTE(mick84 @ Dec 12 2025, 10:03 PM)
MoE assign malay teacher sjkc... cina buat bising pulak.. just recent news.
I pun tak faham why...
*
no issue if those malay teachers can teach their subject in mandarin..

u know what is SRJKC/I rite? ALL subjects are taught in mandarin/indian
angelgemini
post Dec 12 2025, 10:11 PM

...
******
Senior Member
1,751 posts

Joined: Jun 2005
From: Malaysia


QUOTE(seather @ Dec 12 2025, 10:10 PM)
no issue if those malay teachers can teach their subject in mandarin..

u know what is SRJKC/I rite? ALL subjects are taught in mandarin/indian
*
SRJK still got malay and english class la, adui.

so got malay teacher is valid, and Malay class time is more then English.


loserguy
post Dec 12 2025, 10:12 PM

On my way
****
Junior Member
500 posts

Joined: Dec 2019
QUOTE(novblaze @ Dec 12 2025, 10:10 PM)
Lucutkan warganegara if fail bm
*
wajibkan bolasepak kepada semua!



owai
seather
post Dec 12 2025, 10:16 PM

xXxXxXxXx
******
Senior Member
1,335 posts

Joined: Nov 2004


QUOTE(novblaze @ Dec 12 2025, 10:10 PM)
Lucutkan warganegara if fail bm
*
u never taught about this when posting this right? heh

hint: no race got 100% pass rate in BM
river.sand
post Dec 12 2025, 10:52 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,816 posts

Joined: Feb 2012
QUOTE(iSean @ Dec 12 2025, 09:04 PM)
hmm.gif UEC is technically "A-Level" standards.
UEC has direct admission for Singapore's NTU/NUS.

No comment on the Examination Standards for UEC History is it onpar to STPM level.
But I will say how many actually select the Historians Degree pathway in Malaysia? lol.
In regards to Malaysian History to the UEC syllabus, it is covered.
https://www.scribd.com/document/490580456/%...%8E%86%E5%8F%B2

III Examination Structure
(I) The undergraduate examination paper is divided into two parts:

Paper One: Multiple-choice questions (25%)
... Answering time: 40 minutes.
Malaysian History: 10 questions;
Southeast Asian History: 2 questions;
Chinese History: 6 questions;
World History: 7 questions.
All 25 questions must be answered.
Paper Two: Answer questions (75%)
... Answering time: 2 hours 10 minutes.

Part A: Compulsory questions (15%)
1 Malaysian History question is compulsory.

Part B: Answer questions (60%)
Group A: Malaysian History - choose 1 question from 2;
Group B: Southeast Asian History - choose 1 question from 2;
Group C: Chinese History - choose 1 question from 2;
Group D: World History - choose 1 question from 2.
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

*
🧐
I must say the syllabus is more balanced compared to that of national schools.

SMK/SMJK's history subject over emphasize Malaysia history.

P/S I know quite a bit about history of China not because I study it in school, but because I read Louis Cha's novels.
loserguy
post Dec 12 2025, 10:56 PM

On my way
****
Junior Member
500 posts

Joined: Dec 2019
QUOTE(river.sand @ Dec 12 2025, 10:52 PM)
P/S I know quite a bit about history of China not because I study it in school, but because I read Louis Cha's novels.
*
user posted image
novblaze
post Dec 12 2025, 11:52 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
328 posts

Joined: Jan 2015
QUOTE(seather @ Dec 12 2025, 10:16 PM)
u never taught about this when posting this right? heh

hint: no race got 100% pass rate in BM
*
u never thought about this when posting this right? heh

hint: did I say only lucut a race?
Kelefeh
post Yesterday, 12:22 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
115 posts

Joined: Aug 2020
QUOTE(novblaze @ Dec 12 2025, 10:10 PM)
Lucutkan warganegara if fail bm
*
that's why many Indonesian dapat IC rclxms.gif
abelyap
post Yesterday, 12:45 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
234 posts

Joined: Feb 2017


QUOTE(angelgemini @ Dec 12 2025, 10:11 PM)
SRJK still got malay and english class la, adui.

so got malay teacher is valid, and Malay class time is more then English.
*
But dun understand BM, the teacher need translate how?

Lucky nowsday got google translate and SJKC equipped with smartboard
abelyap
post Yesterday, 12:50 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
234 posts

Joined: Feb 2017


QUOTE(GoodBoy2022 @ Dec 12 2025, 08:07 PM)
Sorry la I type C, many more Chinese than Chinese really cannot speak , read and write Malay 1. My relative sekumpulan like this 1.

Just say recognise but you must take SPM BM at least pass and History pass . Settle

Why so difficult . Give and take la
*
TS performed better than Zambry who wrote wall of text statement without solution

TS for PMXI!
scorgio
post Yesterday, 12:56 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,694 posts

Joined: Jan 2005


QUOTE(GoodBoy2022 @ Dec 12 2025, 08:07 PM)
Just say recognise but you must take SPM BM at least pass and History pass . Settle

*
Najib time sudah ada.

UEC + SPM BM credit can masuk Maktab Perguruan.
sadukarzz
post Yesterday, 01:05 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Junior Member
782 posts

Joined: Jul 2011
QUOTE(seather @ Dec 12 2025, 10:08 PM)
as i keep repeating, the best way to kill UEC is to streamline the entry into public uni...

merge STPM, Matrik, Uni Asasi into one....

entry based on merit, with tongkat given based on socioeconomic situation, no pure racial quote..

but which malay politician get balls to take away the racial tongkat?
*
Your opinion seems to hold weight, and I do think its one of the plausible options that can be explored.

That said, there would be a few major hurdles to overcome. What do you think can be done?

*of course, we will have to take into account that simply "forcing it down" i.e. take away "racial tongkats" will not work*

1. The difficulty of merging from:
- Policy level: The modules and syllabus needs to be examined, evaluated and aligned.
- Stakeholder level: Who would be primarily responsible in saying which modules are to be retained and removed?
- Logistical level: When does the merge start? When does students are stopped from being offered such alternatives as choice?
- Human level: How do you solve the "second chance" problem? I believe some people that failed say "STPM" would seek a second chance in Matrikulasi (avoid fail in their certs). But without this (due to the merge), what happens to these people? How to manage employer or higher education consideration criteria?

2. Fiscal prudence and economical impacts:
- The institutions that offers such alternative courses may have tuition that makes up a big chunk of their revenues, what happens to these?
- Since some courses are heavily subsidized and some don't, how do we balance the costs? Would there be a significant increase in the education costs?
- Does this deter further investment in private education? Since most if not all of the examination and subsequently education syllabus would be moderated and evaluated by education ministry?

3. Tongkat issue
- How should it be positioned to gain significant public support without decaying or eroding the main purpose of the merger in the first place?
i.e. Some parties would insist to have religious syllabus included; some languages excluded and so on.

This is some of the points I can come up with at this hour. Hopefully you can shed some light on your opinions on this. Do note that this response is not to question the legitimacy of your idea, more like "if we go with this, what can be done to overcome the hurdles" and hopefully can become a starting point for any policymakers that are observing this space.
seather
post Yesterday, 06:49 AM

xXxXxXxXx
******
Senior Member
1,335 posts

Joined: Nov 2004


QUOTE(novblaze @ Dec 12 2025, 11:52 PM)
u never thought about this when posting this right? heh

hint: did I say only lucut a race?
*
great~ u have my support then.. heh...
seather
post Yesterday, 06:52 AM

xXxXxXxXx
******
Senior Member
1,335 posts

Joined: Nov 2004


QUOTE(sadukarzz @ Dec 13 2025, 01:05 AM)
Your opinion seems to hold weight, and I do think its one of the plausible options that can be explored.

That said, there would be a few major hurdles to overcome. What do you think can be done?

*of course, we will have to take into account that simply "forcing it down" i.e. take away "racial tongkats" will not work*

1. The difficulty of merging from:
- Policy level: The modules and syllabus needs to be examined, evaluated and aligned.
- Stakeholder level: Who would be primarily responsible in saying which modules are to be retained and removed?
- Logistical level: When does the merge start? When does students are stopped from being offered such alternatives as choice?
- Human level: How do you solve the "second chance" problem? I believe some people that failed say "STPM" would seek a second chance in Matrikulasi (avoid fail in their certs). But without this (due to the merge), what happens to these people? How to manage employer or higher education consideration criteria?

2. Fiscal prudence and economical impacts:
- The institutions that offers such alternative courses may have tuition that makes up a big chunk of their revenues, what happens to these?
- Since some courses are heavily subsidized and some don't, how do we balance the costs? Would there be a significant increase in the education costs?
- Does this deter further investment in private education? Since most if not all of the examination and subsequently education syllabus would be moderated and evaluated by education ministry?

3. Tongkat issue
- How should it be positioned to gain significant public support without decaying or eroding the main purpose of the merger in the first place?
i.e. Some parties would insist to have religious syllabus included; some languages excluded and so on.

This is some of the points I can come up with at this hour. Hopefully you can shed some light on your opinions on this. Do note that this response is not to question the legitimacy of your idea, more like "if we go with this, what can be done to overcome the hurdles" and hopefully can become a starting point for any policymakers that are observing this space.
*
simple.. have only one entry exam... u can study in STPM, Asasi or Matriks.. but all take the same exam

as for the racial tongkat issue, it is up to the politicians to convince the rakyat that meritocracy is best for the country...
fongsk
post Yesterday, 07:06 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
34 posts

Joined: Apr 2007
QUOTE(seather @ Dec 13 2025, 06:52 AM)
simple.. have only one entry exam... u can study in STPM, Asasi or Matriks.. but all take the same exam

as for the racial tongkat issue, it is up to the politicians to convince the rakyat that meritocracy is best for the country...
*
Now this is REAL education reform, if this happens. No typical BS ….someone wrote this in X


Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image
touristking
post Yesterday, 07:16 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
5,831 posts

Joined: Jun 2017
Without fail, come EVERY ELECTIONS, DAP often ridicule MCA for not able to get UEC recognized. DAP boosted they can do it in 30 days. So I just sit back and watch the watch on how DAP dig their own grave. Good entertainment.
p4n6
post Yesterday, 07:38 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
5,970 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: KL, Malaysia
QUOTE(GoodBoy2022 @ Dec 12 2025, 08:07 PM)
Sorry la I type C, many more Chinese than Chinese really cannot speak , read and write Malay 1. My relative sekumpulan like this 1.

Just say recognise but you must take SPM BM at least pass and History pass . Settle

Why so difficult . Give and take la
*
Most chinese doesn’t understand school not just study about topic and can speak malay, racial integration is important from young age so that we are not racist and with stereotypes about other races … national school has greater national responsibility than private schools…

Chinese Independent School students are more racist and stereotypical than chinese from SMK. Of course they dont know and dont agree as it is considered normal since been raised that way - subtle education and exposure also affect mindset.

Chinese Independent school failed to solve racial inttergration problem which will be more serious issue as Chinese will be less than 10% population in 20-30 years time’. We need intergtation not segregation. Like it or not this is Malaysia.

UEC shall just be as it is no need to be recognised, students taking UEC also will take SPM anyway, so really no problem actually, only DAP and MCA stir ahit up cause lost support of Chinese.

Top 3 corrupt Najib, Zahid and Rosmah after Anwar become PM, all become non guilty in all court case. DAP and MCA zero word mentioned, want to divert attention to UEC?
fongsk
post Yesterday, 07:41 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
34 posts

Joined: Apr 2007
QUOTE(touristking @ Dec 13 2025, 07:16 AM)
Without fail, come EVERY ELECTIONS, DAP often ridicule MCA for not able to get UEC recognized. DAP boosted they can do it in 30 days. So I just sit back and watch the watch on how DAP dig their own grave. Good entertainment.
*
Karma!!!!

3 Pages < 1 2 3 >Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0207sec    0.72    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 14th December 2025 - 11:26 AM