Tariff, etc could shift price competitiveness.
Given time and resources, almost everything is replaceable. it not necessary to replace prc by one country but could be by a few countries.

prc current situation is like japan in the 1990's. prc may have trade surplus but domestic consumption may be depressed for a few decades.

China is a top trading country with many other countries, doubt they dare to impose tariffs, except US.
THis time is different from 1990s, cos of AI, robotics, automation, and China is very strong in these..
China is also a powerhouse in infrastructure building, ship building & transport that few can compete.
China is also strong in renewable  energy sector esp Solar and Nuclear.

China is a top trading country with many other countries, doubt they dare to impose tariffs, except US.
THis time is different from 1990s, cos of AI, robotics, automation, and China is very strong in these..
China is also a powerhouse in infrastructure building, ship building & transport that few can compete.

at one point europe countries asking china if you keep having surplus we no longer got money to trade with you.

and everyday say china collapse.

at one point europe countries asking china if you keep having surplus we no longer got money to trade with you.

and everyday say china collapse.

I recall the same things was said about Japan dominance in semicon, electronics and cars back in the 90s.

Where is this guy sudah senyap

"blame the slave labour worker ants"

meanwhile in msia the cream cropper white collar worker working 18-hour night shift can only afford poco phone

He's still grifting hard.
But now dare not talk about China collapse liao, cos too ridiculous. 

Now he complains about China's military growing too fast, until spreading into outer space, and how America (who started this "war" in the 1st place) doesn't know its in a war. I guess he's just preparing excuses for when America loses to China in the near future.

Tariff, etc could shift price competitiveness.
Given time and resources, almost everything is replaceable. it not necessary to replace prc by one country but could be by a few countries.

prc current situation is like japan in the 1990's. prc may have trade surplus but domestic consumption may be depressed for a few decades.

Well they need to accumulate more now, because one day they might have to deal with the effect of a balanced trade when the west all gang up and forcefully boycott all exports from China, then they will have to settle for only manufacture for internal consumption as well as other nations who are willing to buy due to lack of capabilities, such as some consumer products like TV etc that many nations are unable to make themselves even if they try.

There are two market segments:

The west, which does have the knowledge and capabilities to create their own products, but choose to rely on China because it is cheaper. This market segment can choose to bite the bullets and boycott all exports from China, and work among themselves to create the same products even though they will be more expensive. The most likely outcome is the rich will get even richer while the middle class and the poor will get even poorer at the end. But it is their freedom so they can freely choose this outcome.

The others, which does have the knowledge and capabilities to create some of their own products. One simple example is TV, not every nations on Earth can create their TV on their own even if they try. It is simply cheaper to buy from other countries, and China is likely going to be the cheapest. Even very common gadgets like smartphone will be a challenge for many nations. China advantages is its sheer size and hence economy of scale dwarf everyone else.

Even if both the markets all work together to totally boycott all exports from China, China can still settle for making products for own consumption only. The populations in China is same as all the western countries including EU and USA and Canada and Australia plus Japan and South Korea combining together. So it is a huge market. In a total boycott environment, things will be weird though. Due to China has low currency value, their products being sold internally will be far cheaper than similar products being sold elsewhere in the world. Anyway, that's just a hypothetical situation since it has not happened.

Artificial dumping

I think k/tard still very naive in economics

Do you know supplies can be bump up and false demand can be create?

Normally the impact of goods price increase due to short supplies.
What is the clear example of short supplies which impact worldwide quality of life? Oil

But CCP did the opposite way aka dumping
Most ppl happy due to low price but after some timeframe the local area business ecosystem will have the worst impact.

Doubt anyone can challenge China which is already the factory of the world. Moreover China is a major trading country with many countries, suicidal to boycott.

Then there is this contradictory report that many ccp graduates cannot find jobs

Ever heard of China +1? They now have factories across asia, if ban china, their proxy ready.

2ndly, angmoh will not able to produce.

The only way to against china is all angmoh become monks and don spend.

China will suffer but not die.