🔥🇭🇰 The Truth About the Hong Kong Fire: What Really Happened 🇨🇳🔥

A lot of people are spreading wild claims, so here’s the full picture based on Chinese media reporting and the actual investigation.

Let’s deal with the biggest lies first: “China didn’t report the materials or the mesh.” or "media blackout."
Wrong! Mainland and Hong Kong Chinese media reported more technical detail than the Western press ever did.

Here’s what we know:

1️⃣ The facade mesh WAS identified.
It was a 密目式安全立网 (dense safety net).
Inspection documents posted in the estate show it came from a Shandong rope-net manufacturer, tested by the Binzhou Inspection & Testing Centre.
HK01 even tried to verify those test numbers online, the files didn’t show up, which is now part of the investigation.

2️⃣ The real problem wasn’t the manufacturer, it was the contractor.
Only Hong Kong contractors, subcontractors and engineering consultants have been arrested.
Why?
Because they chose the materials.
They installed flammable foam boards over the windows.
They wrapped the building in plastic tarps.
They certified the mesh as “fireproof.”
This was negligence on the Hong Kong side, not a manufacturing cover-up.

3️⃣ Beijing’s response was immediate and nationwide.
The State Council ordered a country-wide fire-safety inspection of high-rise buildings.
It also prohibited bamboo/wood scaffolding and non-flame-retardant mesh in high-rise facade work.
Mainland China phased out bamboo scaffolding years ago, Hong Kong didn’t.

👉 And here’s why:
Under One Country, Two Systems, Hong Kong sets its own building codes.
It kept bamboo scaffolding because it treats it as a traditional craft and cultural heritage.
Beijing doesn’t micro-manage Hong Kong’s construction standards, so HK’s outdated methods stayed in place.

💬 Bottom line:
The mesh and materials WERE reported.
The investigation is transparent.
The arrests hit the right people, the ones who selected, certified and installed unsafe materials.
And the tragedy came from local negligence and old practices, not some mysterious mainland conspiracy.

Main thing is cb contractors use flammable materials, bamboo or not. Bamboo might not have cause the fire but definitely is a factor in sustaining the deadly inferno.

Same shit as Grenfell Tower and our PJ EPF building (topkek kena bakar twice). The flammable materials used were the main focus instead of the cause of fire.

This fire giving me "jet fuel can't melt steel beams" arguments vibe

bamboo is safe, strong and good for enviroments that used since ancient china even british hk didnt ban bamboo. westerner introduce netting , osha, etc is quite new though

Yeah, u comment anything about the meow doing lately ? Same same la brader.

applying same marxism leninism logic

lemang sellers would have been barbequed all along

have you seen how lemang bamboo were burned or not

bamboo scaffolding is still used in HK for a number of reasons, mainly due to scarcity of space, if you been to HK streets you'd know, imagine the height of M vertica but with just 2 lanes of road, how to lay steel scaffolding

besides that, steel is not without its flaws, it melts and deformed in high temperature

watch this and tell me after that




don't join dumb wumaos trying to divert the narrative that trying to blame bamboo

lemang sellers have been living with bamboo for decades, bamboo forest in Japan have lasted centuries without major fires like what happened in California last year

This post has been edited by dattebayo: Yesterday, 10:17 AM

She ok or not? Blaming big brother?

Cissy Wang - at least she got the right name......

wumaos dream world.

Lel
pusing jangan tak pusing
under british democracy rules....both contractor and governing body are held accountability
under CCP rules......no accountability....there are still alot of white mice around can be use.

i already explained once, u self go find back.

for a better reference, someone posted heating water with a plastic bag but the plastic bag did not straight away melted.

if still cannot understand, my suggestion is to retake your secondary school science class.

dont skip science

pot calling kettle black.
abang ada baca baik baik?


i guess she forgot she's a public figure.
it's always a norm even in malaysia to say "china mari, will explode".
she likely blame the correct party but should have left out where the material come from. and just say they using non-compliant, cheap flammable safety netting.

Should say account kena hack-ed!

i seriously cannot brain ur counter argument

you said bamboo is the only culprit but you conveniently ignored the netting and foam; already got reporters made simple experiment to show how easy is it to burn the net sample taken at the scene

very hard to debate with wumaos

---

speaking of which, ur CCP wife not yet lari your money?

first she's a canadian, CCP crumbles or rises has nth to do with her

only her husband is an ex-US citizen reassimilated into CCP, and currently a member of CPPCC, so called tukang cari makan

It does not change the fact that she is stupid to include china made comment. The netting choice is made by developer and she could just say developer is responsible for choosing a flammable material over a non flammable one.

Sounds like forever alone incel energy jealous of people having pussi.

dont put words into my mouth.

i never say bamboo is the only culprit.

i said, whatever is causing it to burn for so long is the bamboo fueling it

understand?

Dua dua salah.

Netting sebab easily flamable, bamboo because sustain fire.

Happy?

Walaoyeh.....
The world theory of fire combustion can be throw out.
Even my knowledge regarding thermodynamics which took me two sem to study also no use.
All because of missing bamboo in the equation.