ya, the more sensor, the more problem :X

During the drive, the sensor suddenly stopped sending signals to the ECU or BCM and the car's computers assumed an accident and went into protection mode.

It is the same as Boeing 737 Max 8 and the AOA sensors. When the sensor fails, the MCAS system took over from the pilots and crash the plane.

thats why I try to avoid car with auto brake or auto lane change assist, etc...

even e parking brake also tak suka....
was eyeing tipuR but so expensive and park brake so at the end tak jadi also

means Tesla FSD algorithm is still not matured and unreliable. need rat to test it out. in this Tesla case more dangerous.

for BYD case, yes the sensor problem, at least stops safely under 7 seconds. only other drivers need to be beware of these cars.

Sudden stop without warning like this BYD Bring You Death.

Aiyoyo pilots must always be able to override any system just like driver must be able to take control of the vehicle in case of an emergency. If a vehicle is designed to make its own decisions without any input from the driver, then such vehicle should not be on the road.

It's plain stupid for such a sensor that was working before to fail suddenly and bring the vehicle to an immediate stop. The sale of such vehicle should be stop immediately and a thorough investigation conducted.



This post has been edited by Roman Catholic: May 27 2025, 09:34 AM

The main issue is the car programming how the car react and action when it receives the signal from the sensor. Faulty or not.

In this case, the programming is bad and not mature. The car wasn't fully tested in all situations.

All this Atto car need to be recalled to change the firmware. Otherwise, all this Atto is like time bomb on the road.

The buy back is because the owner has no confidence in the car. And this experience is a phobia for him. I guess he will sell if not buy back.

cos humans ar getting dummer :X

Sensors have been in cars since 10 years ago. Any ICE with an ECU is sure to have sensors. Just that nowadays cars have more sensors for everything.

Once i had a Proton just lose engine power on the road. Engine management just appear on dashboard and even lost power steering. Lucky was not driving fast and not many cars on the road....

if were u will you but another same car????

Got but they have 10 seconds to do it previously. When the plane already nose diving, 10 seconds simply ain't enough to disable the system.

Ice traveling 100kmph whack a stationary 1.7 ton = konpom hkc lor.

Previous sensors mostly for monitoring but passive.

Now more and more active sensors monitoring the car without the driver's decision making. It's like Skynet taking over your car and stopping as it pleases. Human drivers not allowed to do anything. One day, these cars may reverse the aircon motor polarity and suck all the air out from the cabin.

JayPeeJay sudah kenyang???

Humans are not perfect.

So, even the machines they created are not perfect.

Can't imagine if AI begining self aware next time. Due to an imperfect programming, all decision made won't be perfect either.

Moral of the story for Sime Darby , take incidents like this seriously and not try to push the blame to driver in an attempt of trying to escape responsibility.
You can tell they were trying so hard to run away from responsibilities, when they expect the customer to pay for the battery so that they can fix the car..

To /k that is trying so hard to plotek .. don't simply try to blame the driver without understanding what is going on.
Especially those that claim that they manage a large fleet of cars but actually have very little understanding on the electrical system.

This post has been edited by Drian: May 27 2025, 10:43 AM

i suspect rush to market as usual plus software stuff that can OTA they are more confident or likely to rush since can update later. But what if something happens before the OTA update happens? that's the problem with these manufacturers...

yilong ma-si-ke say fail fast fail often learn from mistakes iterate to your goal faster owai

.
Fyi, .......

Gemini AI Overview

Yes, a weak 12V battery can potentially cause door sensors to fail or malfunction. Sensors rely on a consistent and adequate voltage supply to operate correctly. If the battery is weak or failing, it may not provide the necessary voltage for the door sensor to function properly.

Here's why a weak battery can affect door sensors:
- Insufficient Voltage:
Sensors require a specific voltage to operate. A weak battery may not provide enough power, leading to unreliable or inaccurate readings from the sensor.
- Intermittent Operation:
Even if the battery isn't completely dead, it might fluctuate in voltage, causing the sensor to operate intermittently or incorrectly.
- System Malfunction:
A weak battery can also affect other vehicle systems, including the car's computer, which might influence the operation of the door sensors.
- Other Factors:
While a weak battery is a common cause, other factors like wiring issues, sensor failures, or problems with the vehicle's computer can also contribute to sensor problems.

If you're experiencing issues with your car's door sensors, it's always a good idea to have your battery checked and ensure it's providing the necessary voltage.
.

Meanwhile, Matsudah case macam mana?
Must be the seat sensor pulak