Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 BYD Malaysia buys back faulty Atto3

views
     
SUSipohps3
post May 26 2025, 08:20 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,974 posts

Joined: Dec 2011



QUOTE(Boy96 @ May 26 2025, 06:51 PM)
QUOTE(Moderna @ May 26 2025, 06:56 PM)
Kesian sd. Have to cover up for BYD’s poor engineering.
*
you mean Tesla engineering woso?
SUSipohps3
post May 26 2025, 08:20 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,974 posts

Joined: Dec 2011



QUOTE(Alternate Gabriel @ May 26 2025, 08:19 PM)
You can't change perception of any china made products = junk.

See mobile phone as example. they released so many products on a short time. Same goes with other things
*
see post 120
SUSipohps3
post May 27 2025, 09:23 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,974 posts

Joined: Dec 2011



QUOTE(Moderna @ May 27 2025, 07:03 AM)
You got read the article or not first before posting?
The Tesla problem is due to FSD not functioning correctly + user issue. Quoting from your article:
BYD is totally BYD engineering failure. It doesn’t say anywhere that a user should act as a backup to the door sensor nor does make any sense to do that.

Kesian sd. Have to buy back this piece of junk metal..
*
means Tesla FSD algorithm is still not matured and unreliable. need rat to test it out. in this Tesla case more dangerous.

for BYD case, yes the sensor problem, at least stops safely under 7 seconds. only other drivers need to be beware of these cars.
SUSipohps3
post May 27 2025, 04:19 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,974 posts

Joined: Dec 2011



QUOTE(Moderna @ May 27 2025, 04:13 PM)
Again. You are making baseless conclusions. Tesla clearly says that it is a beta and you should use it with caution and full attention like normal driving. The problem was due to users not following instructions.

BYD’s problem is simply because of shit engineering and software integration.
*
basically one is a lab rat and take the risk associated.

This post has been edited by ipohps3: May 27 2025, 04:20 PM
SUSipohps3
post May 27 2025, 04:28 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,974 posts

Joined: Dec 2011



QUOTE(Moderna @ May 27 2025, 04:22 PM)
Again. Same mistake. One is asking you to keep your hands on the steering even with the feature on. All models do this including BYD and Proton/Geely for your info.

The other is shit Engineering.
*
your argument is one sided and protective of the west.

i have no problem calling out both.

btw, mind to say why it is shit engineering according to you?

This post has been edited by ipohps3: May 27 2025, 04:29 PM
SUSipohps3
post May 27 2025, 08:26 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,974 posts

Joined: Dec 2011



QUOTE(Moderna @ May 27 2025, 06:50 PM)
I am not protecting the west. I’m saying it like it is.
When there is a problem with a west product, I don’t have an issue calling it out.

But your argument on “Tesla is the same” in this context is not valid. The article that was shared says there was an accident because the driver chose to ignore fsd warnings.
*
QUOTE
He said, "I was driving to work, running FSD, a car came by, then the steering wheel turned very fast, took the car into the ditch by the roadside, hit a tree on the side, and the car overturned. I didn't have enough time to respond." Even though he was focused on the road, he didn't get to control the car, causing his car to overturn and stop in a state of upside down.


 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0155sec    0.44    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 16th December 2025 - 07:12 PM