QUOTE(MR_alien @ May 15 2025, 07:58 AM)
The Soviet state of .......Nuclear energy for malaysia
Nuclear energy for malaysia
|
|
May 15 2025, 02:31 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
102 posts Joined: Nov 2021 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 15 2025, 02:35 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
102 posts Joined: Nov 2021 |
I dont like the idea, but if you all persisted, please build it near Sink-kapore
|
|
|
May 15 2025, 02:36 PM
Show posts by this member only | IPv6 | Post
#83
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
213 posts Joined: Dec 2008 |
Please build 1 in putrajaya...
|
|
|
May 15 2025, 02:40 PM
Show posts by this member only | IPv6 | Post
#84
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
849 posts Joined: Feb 2011 |
|
|
|
May 15 2025, 02:46 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,863 posts Joined: Aug 2014 From: Soviet Sarawak - Dum Spiro Spero |
support if build next to pm house
|
|
|
May 15 2025, 02:55 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
773 posts Joined: Dec 2010 From: isudahinsap.flac |
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 15 2025, 02:59 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,582 posts Joined: Oct 2007 From: everywhere in sabah |
|
|
|
May 15 2025, 03:25 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
989 posts Joined: Jan 2011 |
QUOTE(DValentine @ May 15 2025, 02:55 PM) That was 13 or 14 years ago. I did asked why, but no feedback from that officer at that time. It was during my uni lawatan sambil belajar day trip to their office. Not sure whether it will still be the current plan or not if this nuclear project is a GO now. |
|
|
May 15 2025, 03:28 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
773 posts Joined: Dec 2010 From: isudahinsap.flac |
QUOTE(Deathscythe@@ @ May 15 2025, 03:25 PM) That was 13 or 14 years ago. I did asked why, but no feedback from that officer at that time. It was during my uni lawatan sambil belajar day trip to their office. Not sure whether it will still be the current plan or not if this nuclear project is a GO now. dead town wanna kasi dead lagi, for fukkin sekend timeppl kena cancer, born with defects even that time gomen also protek jenpunis company kaw kaw until ppl there brought the company to court gomen that time: protek kaw kaw, talk shit say no issue safe bla bla bla ppl there that time: protest kaw kaw This post has been edited by DValentine: May 15 2025, 03:31 PM |
|
|
May 15 2025, 03:41 PM
|
![]()
Junior Member
3 posts Joined: Dec 2021 |
QUOTE(SharpSword @ May 15 2025, 07:40 AM) More stupidity from pmx. Why the hell we need nuclear when there is palm oil biomass, solar and hydro? Clean and renewable. We are big in data Centers. We are trying to push for EV mass updateLooks like this was decided time ago as the price for Russia to take the blame for mh17. Incoming: imported Chernobyl 2. Which state will be the lucky one.? Hope Penang. Both require big upgrade for our National Grid Renewables are a big scam and not enviromentally friendly Fossil fuels are price volatile, sourced from foreign sources and contribute to climate change We invest in Gen 4 reactors and horium reactors will make our power supply ecosystem rock solid and price competetive No Earthquake risk, no typhoon risk. Go for nuclear. Sooner the better yhtan liked this post
|
|
|
May 15 2025, 03:43 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
989 posts Joined: Jan 2011 |
QUOTE(DValentine @ May 15 2025, 03:28 PM) dead town wanna kasi dead lagi, for fukkin sekend time Perhaps that area is currently the least population. Risk assessment point of view. Least risky compared to the rest of the locations. Again, that was when we asked 1st project ya.. So 2nd 3rd unknown...ppl kena cancer, born with defects even that time gomen also protek jenpunis company kaw kaw until ppl there brought the company to court gomen that time: protek kaw kaw, talk shit say no issue safe bla bla bla ppl there that time: protest kaw kaw |
|
|
May 15 2025, 03:44 PM
|
![]()
Junior Member
3 posts Joined: Dec 2021 |
QUOTE(arcadicus @ May 15 2025, 02:36 PM) No lah.Ideal locations are by the sea, along the South facing Singapore and West Coat. By the sea for easier ship transport of materials and waste. Preferably adjacent to current coal plants. So JB, Port Dickson, ,Port Klang, Lumut and Penang |
|
|
May 15 2025, 03:46 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
359 posts Joined: Sep 2015 |
QUOTE(sunami @ May 15 2025, 02:29 PM) advance? do you know those with nuclear reactor are having headache on how to handle the radioactive waste? Better hope China has success with their Thorium Small Modular Reactor and Fusion-Fission Hybrid Reactor which produces far lower nuclear waste.look deeper and google it and find the cost to contain the radioactive waste. dun be stupid and woke cos of green energy.....nothing is perfect in this world China Aims To Operate World’s First Hybrid Fusion-Fission Nuclear Plant By 2030 QUOTE Unlike pure fusion projects such as Iter, Xinghuo will combine fusion and fission. The high-energy neutrons from fusion reactions will trigger fission in surrounding materials, increasing energy output while potentially reducing nuclear waste. |
|
|
|
|
|
May 15 2025, 03:56 PM
|
![]()
Junior Member
38 posts Joined: Jun 2012 |
TS stupid AF.
The nuclear reactor planned for Malaysia is actually a SMR type (Go read yourself). It can bring huge benefit in terms of power security amidst rising demand. It is also very much carbon neutral, not completely, but yeah. |
|
|
May 15 2025, 04:03 PM
|
![]()
Junior Member
7 posts Joined: Jul 2019 |
Build it on offshore islands. Security also safer.
Relocate any inhabitants so even if accident = no risk to inhabitants. Large scale emergency evacuation zone is 20km. Offshore islands more than 20km from next nearest island. Why must be on mainland? |
|
|
May 15 2025, 04:09 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
70 posts Joined: Aug 2014 |
QUOTE(SharpSword @ May 15 2025, 07:40 AM) More stupidity from pmx. Why the hell we need nuclear when there is palm oil biomass, solar and hydro? Clean and renewable. do you know 82% of bolehland energy still come from burning coal and gas????Looks like this was decided time ago as the price for Russia to take the blame for mh17. Incoming: imported Chernobyl 2. Which state will be the lucky one.? Hope Penang. renewable only 18% boi. kurang otak realli bahaya |
|
|
May 15 2025, 04:12 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
102 posts Joined: Nov 2021 |
|
|
|
May 15 2025, 04:12 PM
Show posts by this member only | IPv6 | Post
#98
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,682 posts Joined: Oct 2004 From: let there be rain |
TS lagi stupiak.
|
|
|
May 15 2025, 04:15 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
359 posts Joined: Sep 2015 |
QUOTE(takbodoh722 @ May 15 2025, 04:03 PM) Build it on offshore islands. Security also safer. Best is go for small modular reactors because they use passive safety, which do not require external power source or operator intervention. Relocate any inhabitants so even if accident = no risk to inhabitants. Large scale emergency evacuation zone is 20km. Offshore islands more than 20km from next nearest island. Why must be on mainland? Fukushima nuclear disaster happened because the backup generators were flooded by the tsunami and couldn't function to cool the reactors. |
|
|
May 15 2025, 04:18 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,534 posts Joined: Jul 2006 |
QUOTE(trusol @ May 15 2025, 04:46 PM) Better hope China has success with their Thorium Small Modular Reactor and Fusion-Fission Hybrid Reactor which produces far lower nuclear waste. yupe...but thorium wont be so near future wo...China Aims To Operate World’s First Hybrid Fusion-Fission Nuclear Plant By 2030 just beh tahan people screaming about green energy by looking on the surface only..............those wokeshit mind.... without knowing the handling part is not so green and cost a bomb...kek edit: i bet these wokeshit doesnt know nuclear reactor do have lifespan..... This post has been edited by sunami: May 15 2025, 04:21 PM |
| Change to: | 0.0214sec
1.06
5 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 19th December 2025 - 01:49 AM |