ts is getting stupidier day after day

How dare you not consider those lifes of Thai mois that live next door?

Thaimoi > Perlis

Owaiii...

nuclear expert from abroad - maybe
local 3rd world pay-peanuts-get-monkeys expert - Welcome to Nuclear Swamp land radioactive theme park !

This is where clarity is needed in the thinking of the rakyat as we are faced with 2 apparent kinds of evil. One kind that undermines public well being and safety through policy making that is entrenched in conflicts of interest. On the other hand some feel their moral and religious liberty is being threatened. Which is worse? Let him who has a brain to think figure it out.

Learn from murica or British la. They got no serious incident so far

once upon a time hu ha about lynas, now this is more radiation

If done right, nuclear energy is one of the best sources of energy that is available to us right now. Solar and wind are unpredictable. Hydro is damaging to environment.
We should definitely have renewable yes. But nuclear is one of the best stable, controllable source of energy.

The nuclear waste problem is often overblown. Most people don't know how little waste there is and it's typically stored on site. If we learn from the French where they reprocess spent fuel, the amount of waste is really miniscule.

This post has been edited by godhpf: May 15 2025, 10:48 AM

Don't be an @5swipw. Nuclear is a must.




Don't bodo clean energy must accept nuklear soon we will use fusion from Chyna selamat digunakan.


Even if meltdown biar. We make a plant near Singkiepork sahaja let them protest. Blow then they die Southern state die.

US don't reprocess their spent fuel though. So not an ideal side to learn from. I think UK stopped or planning to stop reprocessing too.

+1.

Bcoz this place use a lot power..

Just so TS know, palm oil biomass is a no no as far as western opinions is concerned. Palm oil itself is bad for environment, so the west not gonna count the biomass as green energy.

As for solar, please force solar installers to lower price lah. The panels are supposed to be cheap because the suppliers are forced to flood the market as they lost the western market.

Red Alert soon

Page 3 already but no one highlight basic point.

A huge chunk of Bolehland electricity is generated by coal. That's the worst kind of polluting source for electricity generation.

If can switch to other fossil fuel source, long ago already switch.

Ok to burn coal until when?

https://www.malaymail.com/news/malaysia/202...minister/168785

There is only 1 other source that can match coal's low cost electricity generation. No prizes for guessing which source.

This post has been edited by takbodoh722: May 15 2025, 11:25 AM

Coal has been around for many decades and its dependency will not go away just because someone found a new source of energy

Renewable energy has yet to reach mass adoption level and a lot of countries are still dependent on the traditional coal and fossil fuel, it’s slow but we are getting there

The government does not do good enough in Solar energy for domestic and Commercial.

Lower the installation cost of Solar to encourage every one to have it. Reduce on TNB energy. So that the quota can give to essential industry.

Think about it. Malaysia' peak period electricity generation is 16GWh of which ~half is from coal. Every GW of nuclear power reduces coal use by 12.5%. The largest nuke power plant in Japan generates 8 GW, China's largest generates 6 GW.

1 site in Bolehland can replace coal use (or at least put it into reserve capacity).

Why cannot remove coal dependency? Its not because of technical constraint.

West have a lot of opinions. Some valid some biased. But at the end of the day when you get hit with cancer West not gonna pay for your treatment.
I am not saying palm oil/coal is good but between that and nuclear I rather choose the former.
I myself use solar 100%. The power is damn good but with the limitations of night time/dark skies. But you win some and lose some. In the long term solar is preferred.

Certified and accredited nuclear expert.
You must be forgotten that in /k/ there are alot of /k/tard instantly become nuclear expert when news agency report nuclear reactor disaster.

nuclear plant will not fly with the very unsophisticated population in Malaysia, that prefers to go drink morning coffee.

yes, the main reason is because cannot convince population. No technical constraint. Current & future generaiton of nuclear power generation is safe. Past accidents all involve early generation nuclear tech.

However convincing population of safety is an uphill task and the real reason why it can't take off.

...even in an educated country like sinkieland, cannot convince. Bolehland even more difficult.