QUOTE(KineticKill @ Nov 2 2024, 03:09 PM)
Problem is there are talents among tree people but they might not necessarily get the right early education. Conversely, there are dumbfuck rich kids with lots of supports from early age. Which one will win meritocracy?
Now here’s the kicker: those dumbfuck rich kids will even get free tertiary education! Lulz
https://www.nst.com.my/news/nation/2024/07/...arawakians-2026At least they don't use degrading terms like "tree-people" like yourself, give you unlimited education also no use.
QUOTE(KineticKill @ Nov 2 2024, 03:19 PM)
You’ll be surprised how many dumbfucks are in the unis, because their academic achievements do not show as such. Rote learning at its best.
But yeah, my point is these rich kids with various supports will get free tertiary education as well as disadvantaged poor tree people. Meritocracy ftw!
Education, regardless meritocracy or not, should be made available to everyone.
It's a basic human rights. If they are really not achieving, what makes you think that they are eligible for university?
It states FREE EDUCATION FOR ALL, they did not say FREE EDUCATION COMPULSORY ENROLLMENT FOR ALL, there's a difference.
QUOTE(Pikichu @ Nov 2 2024, 03:26 PM)
Meritocracy has its benefit, to retain talents based on merits, which I support.
But if gov't is not inclusive to provide edu for slow learners then wealthgap will widen.
Hopefully Sarawak will live up to this promise of reform and not let slow learners drop out, maybe slow could be introduced into TVET.
Provide education for slow learners is entirely okay, if the achievers are prioritized as per the meritocracy. If after priority still got space, why not?
QUOTE(KineticKill @ Nov 2 2024, 03:32 PM)
Here’s the thing: the meritocracy part is good. But it has to focus on equity rather than equality.
Rafizi said something about this a while back. He said it’s not fair to compare his child studying in one of the best public schools in Putrajaya with a poor child in rural area.
Sarawak govt has to acknowledge that the rich-poor gap in the state is quite large. To have a perfectly level playing field is impossible, but working towards equity will mean giving a bit of leeway towards disadvantaged poor students.
Your opinion, heavily plagued with assumptions. Seems that education too, has failed you.
I too, can assume that you are just another keyboard warrior that have so much opinion on what others do, but does not contribute significantly towards your own local community.
Also while at it I might also add, enjoying aircond and does not know the hardships of walking through jungle and crossing river just to get education and then - get labelled by some forumer as "tree people" or even "dumb fuck".