QUOTE(edinhoven @ Jan 9 2008, 05:29 PM)
Is the lawyer a copyright or software lawyer? Do they know who they are dealing with? I think have to b careful when writing abt them, like NST suing Jeff Ooi for blogging on the net atlhough he has no control over what was said in his blog. I don't want after lowyat.net kena sue. We will attack and finish SMM and direct our focus on SMM. Happy Holidays!!!
I don't know which type of lawyer he is but I'll keep on posting. It won't be LYN's 1st time anyway

According to 3rd page of agreement, its written that SMM is a limited agent for Blizzard in Malaysia which given non exclusive rights and has granted legal authority against any person or legal entity for the illegal production, modification and distribution in Malaysia. In my interpretation, the realms that SMM can touch is VCD/Game shops that sells the games, factory that produces the games, take down private server for distributing PVPGN connector hacks or take down local website thats distribute full version of the game online. Providing games to end user play for a fee
is not a form of distribution but categorize as commercial use of end user product. So what we see here SMM does not have automatic legal authority against cybercafe.
If there is any legal charges to accuse, that will be:-
1. SMM is abuse the legal authority [Copyright Act 1987 - SMM is not the copyright owner]
2. cheated cc outlet of their authority by giving their own EUA instead of Blizzard/VUG's CULA
3. collecting illegal fees from cc outlets
4. approving private servers as authorized servers [Copyright Act 1987 - SMM is not the copyright owner]
5. making profit via private servers
I'm have no legal knowledge but this is as much bullshit i can make lol
Copyright Act 1987 [
pdf]
Trade Descriptions Act 1972 [
pdf]
This post has been edited by strace: Jan 9 2008, 06:11 PM