The email just show what the team is doing with it. Not what the drivers are doing with it.
From what I could gather at other forums, it seems that the ruling could partly be due to the fact that Renault went forward to the FIA with those information, so maybe, who knows. Can;t say the FIA has been perfect with their judgement lately.
What I don't like is their lawsuit against ITV commenter, forgot who that was. That's worse than Renault ruling.
This is what I meant earlier. Selective memory.
FIA made ferrari changed their wing = FIA ferrari assistance
FIA made ferrari change their floorboard = FIA ferrari assistance
Ferrari put on intermediate tire while FIA stated all must start with wets (japan I think). And rightfully so, Ferrari need to start at the back of the grid. Whatever happened, rules are still rules. But does this show FIA pro Ferrari?
Either you have some memory issue or you just conveniently ignore those issues. Either way you have some issues.
FIA aren't perfect with their rulings, but if you want to question their decision, question their judgment itself, but don't ever make up such a crap about FIA pro other team.
Here's one cold hard fact you need to swallow. If FIA really was pro Ferrari and anti mcLaren, McLaren would have long left F1. Any team who felt being biased against would not stick around in F1. The team don't run on water, they need real money. It's funny how you finds FIA to be pro Ferrari when those people who are running those team, those real people who are involve in it, doesn't think so. Maybe you should run your own championship.