Sony-Ericsson ★ Sony Ericsson K850i 5MP Cybershot(tm) -V2- Thread ★, Sony Ericsson's first 5.0MP phone!
Sony-Ericsson ★ Sony Ericsson K850i 5MP Cybershot(tm) -V2- Thread ★, Sony Ericsson's first 5.0MP phone!
|
|
Oct 15 2007, 11:19 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
20,901 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Miri, Sarawak |
K810 better ka..? I like k850 more..
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 15 2007, 11:29 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,252 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Apple MACland |
|
|
|
Oct 15 2007, 11:29 PM
|
|
VIP
11,883 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
K850i's design is funky and cool.
The K800i and K810i has pretty boring/standard designs. This post has been edited by shockk: Oct 15 2007, 11:30 PM |
|
|
Oct 15 2007, 11:31 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,173 posts Joined: Aug 2006 From: Kuala Lumpur |
Should I buy the red K810 or wait for the K850,eh?
|
|
|
Oct 15 2007, 11:52 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,252 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Apple MACland |
|
|
|
Oct 16 2007, 12:02 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,467 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Online wirelessly |
harmeet : mind to post pictures taken by k850i?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 16 2007, 12:05 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,853 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: Glue Town/Old Trafford |
|
|
|
Oct 16 2007, 12:36 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,157 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
my test shots
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « k850i overexposed the pic and the pic is not that detailed as captured by n95 , when cropped @ 100% from my shots, as shown previously from other review websites so far looked back at the first 2 pics, n95 captured the lights reflection off the floor well, whereby k850i didn't all pics are snapped in auto settings just my 2cents |
|
|
Oct 16 2007, 12:46 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,173 posts Joined: Aug 2006 From: Kuala Lumpur |
QUOTE(dragna @ Oct 15 2007, 11:52 PM) If for the K810, I can afford it.For the K850, I can afford if I wait for a few more months. That is if the original price is around RM20XX. Heard so many complaining about the K850 camera. Added on October 16, 2007, 12:50 am QUOTE(8431 @ Oct 16 2007, 12:36 AM) my test shots Good god. That pic is really taken with the K850?» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « k850i overexposed the pic and the pic is not that detailed as captured by n95 , when cropped @ 100% from my shots, as shown previously from other review websites so far looked back at the first 2 pics, n95 captured the lights reflection off the floor well, whereby k850i didn't all pics are snapped in auto settings just my 2cents You should really adjust the white balance and ISO. This post has been edited by G-Izzat: Oct 16 2007, 12:52 AM |
|
|
Oct 16 2007, 12:50 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,467 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Online wirelessly |
8431 : try daylight setting and see if the picture improves. also set to low ISO.
p/s : never see K850i before, just a suggestion |
|
|
Oct 16 2007, 12:52 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,768 posts Joined: Sep 2007 |
the k850 picture quality quite bad leh
|
|
|
Oct 16 2007, 12:55 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
6,657 posts Joined: Jul 2006 |
wah V2 oready.....do we hav an owner list yet ?
|
|
|
Oct 16 2007, 01:01 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,729 posts Joined: Oct 2005 From: Gotham City |
QUOTE(ahming888 @ Oct 15 2007, 11:16 PM) IMHO, k850 has a way more cooler n better design n look..its more sleek n eye catching QUOTE(G-Izzat @ Oct 15 2007, 11:31 PM) red k810 wud really look hot n smthing rare in market. n k850 isnt much better than k810...so if u cant wait, just go 4 da k810.. QUOTE(avenger @ Oct 16 2007, 12:02 AM) i hv uploaded afew...check da previous page..QUOTE(8431 @ Oct 16 2007, 12:36 AM) my test shots i tink u hv 2 adjust da light settings...» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « k850i overexposed the pic and the pic is not that detailed as captured by n95 , when cropped @ 100% from my shots, as shown previously from other review websites so far looked back at the first 2 pics, n95 captured the lights reflection off the floor well, whereby k850i didn't all pics are snapped in auto settings just my 2cents |
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 16 2007, 01:04 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,173 posts Joined: Aug 2006 From: Kuala Lumpur |
|
|
|
Oct 16 2007, 01:06 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again |
Current driver for K850i seems not really good but I believe in future new firmware will update the camera and it should perform and manage to snap a very decent photos
|
|
|
Oct 16 2007, 01:21 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,729 posts Joined: Oct 2005 From: Gotham City |
|
|
|
Oct 16 2007, 01:36 AM
|
|
VIP
11,883 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(8431 @ Oct 16 2007, 12:36 AM) my test shots Looks like SE is still stubborn and sticking to their stupid high compression algorithm for photos, which is the main downfall of the K800i/K810i. » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « k850i overexposed the pic and the pic is not that detailed as captured by n95 , when cropped @ 100% from my shots, as shown previously from other review websites so far looked back at the first 2 pics, n95 captured the lights reflection off the floor well, whereby k850i didn't all pics are snapped in auto settings just my 2cents As an example, this is very apparent when the file size of the original photograph is much smaller than it should be. In the K800i/K810i, photos never go above 1MB, or even near it. Whereas phones like N73/N93/903SH all have photo files going above 1MB (sometimes even up to 1.4/1.5MB) normally. In conclusion, high compression = smaller file size = less detail = bad photo quality. This post has been edited by shockk: Oct 16 2007, 01:38 AM |
|
|
Oct 16 2007, 02:11 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
625 posts Joined: Oct 2005 |
one thing about SE camera is that they are able to produce picture that closer to the real stuff
Compared to SE, nokia produces image that looks pleasant but its different than the real stuff. Damn! how should i put it, i hope u guys understand wat im trying to tell. lol |
|
|
Oct 16 2007, 02:15 AM
|
|
VIP
11,883 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(radical85 @ Oct 16 2007, 02:11 AM) one thing about SE camera is that they are able to produce picture that closer to the real stuff You're right. That is one advantage (or disadvantage) of SE. But that only relates to colour accuracy.Compared to SE, nokia produces image that looks pleasant but its different than the real stuff. Damn! how should i put it, i hope u guys understand wat im trying to tell. lol And colour accuracy is nowhere as important as photographic detail which SE lacks, and this is a major disadvantage SE has. |
|
|
Oct 16 2007, 02:35 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again |
|
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0251sec
0.84
6 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 5th December 2025 - 11:47 AM |