Sony-Ericsson ★ Sony Ericsson K850i 5MP Cybershot(tm) -V2- Thread ★, Sony Ericsson's first 5.0MP phone!
|
|
 Oct 16 2007, 12:36 AM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
 
Senior Member
2,157 posts Joined: Jan 2003 
|
my test shots
 » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « k850i overexposed the pic and the pic is not that detailed as captured by n95 , when cropped @ 100% from my shots, as shown previously from other review websites so far looked back at the first 2 pics, n95 captured the lights reflection off the floor well, whereby k850i didn't all pics are snapped in auto settings just my 2cents  will post few of close up shots done on k850i by n95 later lol |
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 16 2007, 10:16 AM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
|
Senior Member
2,157 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
QUOTE(G-Izzat @ Oct 16 2007, 12:46 AM) Good god. That pic is really taken with the K850? mate, do u understand wat is pic snapped wif auto settings? lolYou should really adjust the white balance and ISO.  both n95 n k850i snapped in auto. QUOTE(avenger @ Oct 16 2007, 12:50 AM) 8431 : try daylight setting and see if the picture improves. also set to low ISO. unit is not mine, so cannot play around wif it much lol. p/s : never see K850i before, just a suggestion  well, the thing is, i set all to auto. so out of cam experience, n95 did better. QUOTE(harmeet15 @ Oct 16 2007, 01:01 AM) i tink u hv 2 adjust da light settings... light settings? what light settings?what i shown was to a normal user, do u know wat to set how 2 set etc? for a normal user what u would do is take out ur cam and start to snap rite? that's what i did, snapped using auto for both. actually the exif is still intact inside those photos, k850i@1/10",ISO 200, while n95@/1/17", ISO 160... differs not that much imo. if i were to tweak the WB, ISO, then i wud do the same for the n95 also rite? what i wanted 2 show was jz a fair comparsion using the auto settings which most typical users will use IMO. sorry lo if my pics turns out noob for all of u guys le..hope others can provide better pics le. just my 2cents. |
|
|
Oct 16 2007, 01:46 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
|
Senior Member
2,157 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
QUOTE(G-Izzat @ Oct 16 2007, 11:46 AM) I know what it means,thanks. mate, no offense, i din meant to say u dun know about it, but pls reread my post, so why should i change the WB and all that? my test was2 show the results based on auto settings.I'm only advising you to manually change the white balance and all that. thx for the advice tho lol. cheers. |
|
|
Oct 16 2007, 09:10 PM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
|
Senior Member
2,157 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
QUOTE(G-Izzat @ Oct 16 2007, 05:44 PM) Heh, none taken, bro. N95 is much better. That, I know for now. It makes everything seems very colourful. Whereas the K850 takes dull pictures. QUOTE(harmeet15 @ Oct 16 2007, 06:12 PM) i somewat agree to tat QUOTE(ZeroWrath @ Oct 16 2007, 08:05 PM) Nokia makes the photos more colourful. That's providing eye candy pictures to the user, which gives a better impression to the person, since it would look nice, so in the end the person tends to forget about how "real" the picture is compared to the real thing. To me, it would be perfect if this feature can be turned off. SE's camera seems to be trying to capture the more natural colours of the objects, but then it doesn't seem to be working properly. In the end comes out a dull picture that isn't really close to the actual colours anyway, not only that the quality isn't all great and well worth to boast about. If that is really SE's idea, that is to get the actual, natural colours, then I'm all for it. If you want eye candy stuff, might as well take the pics and edit in Photoshop? Nokia basically making it simple by doing immediately after taking the pics, but it's not easily reversible now is it? But then, currently, SE's k850 photo shots not very pleasing... I guess it's perfect for resizing, but otherwise...  *continues to keep track silently of SE's progress* the pic i /snapped/shown, the k850i overexposes it and the colours are not accurate n95 is more accurate/natural to the moment/environment when the picture was snapped or so called natural colors. so where does ur theory on SE trying 2 make stuffs more real applies?  a picture captured is not all about colors only, one need to take account the white balance and exposure as well. since in my test case, it was @ auto settings, it shud've figured out the best exposure or not to overexpose the scene rite? what good is a picture whether dull or vivid if in the end the pics was overexposed? details not captured or loss, as shown in my post, k850i loses as it didn't capture the reflection off the floor of available lightings inside the environment as n95 did. colors can be corrected and reproduced, but not details. and overexposed pics usually will results in stuffs like details lost. i tweaked k850i pic in photoshop, so it doesn't overexpose n colors are more vivid, but still i can't reproduce the reflection of the lights rite? just my 2cents. This post has been edited by 8431: Oct 16 2007, 09:14 PM |
|
|
Oct 17 2007, 02:09 AM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
|
Senior Member
2,157 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
some close up pics of k850i
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « |
|
|
Oct 18 2007, 10:09 PM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
|
Senior Member
2,157 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
QUOTE(shockk @ Oct 18 2007, 11:34 AM) Hehe. Nowadays, can get even a brand new DSLR for about RM2k such as the Canon 350D. camphone is limiting But still I prefer phones. Even though we can't expect much from phones like N95/K850i, it can still fit in our pocket well.   |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: |  0.0630sec
 0.44
 7 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 6th December 2025 - 05:11 PM |
Quote
