Dun Compare a Mercedes(Vidic) with a Kancil (Agger) here.
Vidic is clearly much betta den agger.
Agger do concede penalty with some stupid tackles,
Sorry if i ofended any liverpool fans here

oh yeah? got proof?
if you're football's professional i might accept ur comment but not from the fans

i support vidic

No offence taken mate. Opinions of retards don't bother me much. Pick up some facts and then come back.

No comment. 50% 50% on both. No need to argue.

This post has been edited by zeist: Sep 21 2007, 11:21 PM

/\ I-D-I-O-T

Let me see, so far this season LFC has conceded 4 penalties against Villa, Chelsea, Pompey & Porto. None of those were Agger's fault. Mercedes & Kancil? Clearly you intended to offend LFC supporters.

This post has been edited by easypeasy: Sep 21 2007, 11:32 PM

Close THREAD~!

---

Added on September 21, 2007, 11:43 pmVidic Mercedes?
Wat so special about him btw?
only noe hw to score goals using head???
Only scores goal against Weak Team??
come on..
Agger can score goals using legs...not head...
Agger scored goals against top4 and CL semi-finalist...
Agger pushed Liverpool to CL final..

Did vidic do tat?

haha..

Anyway, MOD pls close thread... i think there will be an outburst sooner or later...


This post has been edited by dream5518: Sep 21 2007, 11:43 PM

hmm..both....kinda same....but...vidic..looks ...tougher...and agger looks...strong...haha...duno..la...both oso...great defender....

I might be biased, but I think Vidic is better. He is stronger and tackles harder, which are the cunning instincts the best defenders should have.

Agger is a good player in his own right. But I do not see him lunge into 50-50 tackles and come away with the ball, leaving the striker lying on the ground.

And Vidic has scored important goals in the Champions League. He scored against Benfica to send United to the knock out stages.

mercedes and kancil ??

If Agger is kancil and Vidic is mercedes

then u are??

This post has been edited by lolz_5167: Sep 22 2007, 12:14 AM

Go suck on an exhaust pipe 10 times and call it daddy.

When it comes to importance, Agger scored the only goal in the 2nd leg of the Champions League semi final.

haha.. looks like leongtat is being 'tat' now.

haha, cant compare ler..both also good players..

both have their own advantages...but i dont think they are like mercedes and kancil...maybe like mercedes and bmw , and kancil is suitable to describe our local player

both of them have their own styles....so it is nothing can be to compare....

no need to compare. pointless. just close this thread

I'd expect fans to be biased to an extent just like myself. It's ok to think one player is better than the other so long as you have reasons to justify your answer. It's posters like "leotard" with nonsensical answers that piss people off.

The answer for the bold statement is \/

Had Agger did not score that equalising goal, perhaps Chelsea have won the Champions League last season & Mourinho is still at Chelsea today.

There are reason why i didn't want to post here, but since everyone already have their rant, here's mine.

Vidic will be the more logical choice at the moment - more matured, composed and with a heck lot more experience. Agger is young and eager, look a lot more elegent and more composed with the ball. I say both have their advantage and disadvantes over each other. The edge is on Vidic's side but for how long thats another story altogether.

This post has been edited by JonC: Sep 22 2007, 09:57 AM