both good. nice and easy. stop bringing up the sinking thread.
Who is a better player?, Nemanja Vidic or Daniel Agger?
|
|
 Jan 16 2008, 04:23 PM
|
 
Senior Member
5,806 posts Joined: Aug 2007 From: PJ | Tokyo  
|
|
Quote|
|
|
|
|
Jan 16 2008, 04:31 PM
|
 
Elite
6,112 posts Joined: Sep 2006 From: Earth
|
QUOTE(jobseekz @ Jan 16 2008, 04:19 PM) just look at the stats and compare.....simply VIDIC lar You surely do put up a convincing argument. |
|
|
Jan 16 2008, 06:20 PM
|
Junior Member
21 posts Joined: Jan 2008
|
id say vidic for quality, and agger for style
|
|
|
Jan 16 2008, 06:27 PM
|
Junior Member
224 posts Joined: Dec 2005 From: Around JB
|
Vidic is good but sometimes day dreaming...
Agger is hardworking but not good enough... |
|
|
Jan 16 2008, 06:37 PM
|
Senior Member
4,242 posts Joined: Aug 2006 From: Soviet Putrajaya
|
TS u should ask which club is better.. Liverpool pr Man U..
 |
|
|
Jan 16 2008, 06:38 PM
|
Senior Member
1,770 posts Joined: Dec 2007
|
Vidic for the time being.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 16 2008, 07:07 PM
|
|
Senior Member
5,909 posts Joined: Jan 2006 From: 06.02.58.44.23.08.03
|
QUOTE(Grengo01 @ Sep 20 2007, 10:17 AM) It is no comparison. Both have their strengths, Vida is almost a complete Centre Back, Agger? Nuff said. Vidic is a good long passer, good tackler, good header of the ball and also "i-want-it-no-matter-what" type of player,  he has his good partner with diferent type of CB at M.U.. owh and he's a badass , i got my jersey with his name at the back.. He is very2 good.. My idol..Added on January 16, 2008, 7:20 pm QUOTE(ervinliew86 @ Sep 20 2007, 10:17 PM) As an arsenal fan, personally I feel Vidic is a better player, but that's because he plays alongside Ferdinand. But I really remember the mistakes he did against 3-0 trashing of AC Milan last season. He played horribly, wrong-time tackles, not marking Kaka & etc. But overall, when he's on top gear, he's good defensively. & not to forget, he's a good header in set-pieces. As for Agger, well, he's still young & can improve. Amazing cracker against West Ham last season. Haha... So, the verdict, both are ok-ok defender. Without Ferdinand or Carragher alongside them, i think they'll stuggle... he just came back from injury..This post has been edited by maxizanc: Jan 16 2008, 07:20 PM |
|
|
Jan 20 2008, 12:02 PM
|
Junior Member
221 posts Joined: Jan 2008 From: Anfield Road 
|
although i`m a liverpool fan but i regret to admit that VIDIC is much better from AGGER..gud aerial ability and strong pysically...but more to come from AGGER as he still improving...
 |
|
|
Jan 21 2008, 09:57 AM
|
Junior Member
75 posts Joined: Jan 2008
|
both hav their own strength and weaknesses
but ill go for vidic~~  |
|
|
Jan 21 2008, 03:40 PM
|
Junior Member
250 posts Joined: Jan 2008
|
I can't compare them as a defender but Vidic a better header and scorer of goals...
|
|
|
Jan 21 2008, 04:11 PM
|
Junior Member
430 posts Joined: Sep 2006 From: Gombak,Selangor 
|
I would prefer Vidic..he's tall and fierce..i think Rio must be teaching him to be mean to opponents..he can score goals..he helps Rio to built the confident at the back four..he is our Ministry of Defence..hahahaha..
This post has been edited by caballero206: Jan 21 2008, 04:11 PM |
|
|
Jan 22 2008, 04:35 AM
|
|
Junior Member
197 posts Joined: Apr 2005 
|
agger
|
|
|
Jan 22 2008, 05:01 AM
|
|
Senior Member
737 posts Joined: Oct 2005
|
Although I'm a Liverpool Loyalist.. but I have to admit Vidic is more solid and reliable than Agger.. I even think we should put Agger as a midfielder.. He's more creative than Vidic, passes really well and has good long-shots.. Vidic is a natural central defender, great at reading game..
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 22 2008, 06:31 AM
|
Senior Member
1,473 posts Joined: Oct 2007
|
id say vidic because he score goals and has good aerial abilities...
|
|
|
Jan 22 2008, 08:00 AM
|
Senior Member
7,126 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: in ur base killin your d00dz 
|
why cannot compare vidic with carragher ? ?? i nv seen agger play b4 lol
|
|
|
Jan 22 2008, 08:03 AM
|
Junior Member
277 posts Joined: Oct 2006 From: Chicago, Illinois
|
its unfair to compare agger to vidic.. agger is alot younger than vidic, but if i have to pick.. it would be vidic, he is more of a no nonsense type but he's not one of the best defenders imo
|
|
|
Jan 22 2008, 08:44 AM
|
|
Senior Member
4,457 posts Joined: Jul 2005
|
QUOTE(Duke Red @ Jan 16 2008, 04:31 PM) You surely do put up a convincing argument. just watch the game reading vs man united |
|
|
Mar 25 2008, 01:46 PM
|
Junior Member
30 posts Joined: Mar 2008
|
If you want to compare a central back, Vidic is the better than Agger.
Central back is all about no-nonsense defense and physically tough where Vidic has both. I would say Agger is not physically strong enough.  |
|
|
Mar 25 2008, 01:58 PM
|
|
Junior Member
205 posts Joined: Mar 2008
|
It is almost meaningless to bring this kind of thread which sink without trace months ago back to top and yet start another flame war like last time
 |
|
|
Mar 25 2008, 02:17 PM
|
Senior Member
1,889 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
agger injured for quite some time and wont be available until next season...so, what to discuss anyway
|
| Change to: |  0.0200sec
 0.88
 5 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 18th December 2025 - 02:18 PM |
All Rights Reserved © 2002- 2025 Vijandren Ramadass (~unite against racism~)
Powered by Invision Power Board © 2025 IPS, Inc.