Was having a conversation with a friend who supports Manchester United (I'm a Liverpool supporter), and we got into the topic of Vidic vs Agger.

Both comparatively new to the English game and their respective clubs.

Both plays the same position.

Both doing effectively well on their own level.

Vidic is more of a no-nonsense tough tackling defender.

Agger is more of a technical and creative defender.

So, who is it going to be?

p/s I hope Manchester United and Liverpool fans will be able to participate in this conversation without biasness. It takes a bigger man to admit that a player from your rival team is indeed a better one, if he really is in your own opinion.

Have fun

This post has been edited by blinky: Sep 20 2007, 03:33 AM

You haven't given us your opinion and with your p/s stuff, most people WILL want to be bigger men and answer you. Me? I'd go for Vidic any day. He keeps clean sheets and he scores goals. What more can you ask? He win you games and he makes sure you dont lose

Though I'm a Liverpool supporter, I have to say Vidic. One of the most solid defenders in EPL for the last season.

However, I can see that Agger has plenty of potential left to develop compared to Vidic.

Pool fan will choose Agger while Red Devil fan will say Vidic is better

no one is better.. both got their own advantage and disadvantage..

p/s : agger also scoring goals.. remember a winning goal against chelsea in semi final CL last year? before that thunderbolt just like riise i forgot against which team.

westham i think, I'd say Vidic too...

not being bias here.. but i really think agger is no close match for vidic..
just being straight forward, sorry if i've offended anyone..

match winner against West Ham.
Sweet left foot he has.

I think he is very suitable to play as a cover up for the left back in case the left back push up too far ahead and not in time to track back.

hahahaha i wud say vidic lor .. ,considering his body and all ... and vidic also scores goals .. the last 1 was a match winning agains everton

agger still young i believe when agger at vidic's age he's better than vidic now

Clearly Bramble is better than the both of them put together. Bramble and Boumsong, ahhh...what a dream partnership.

vidic! vidic! vidic!

neither ... terry the best

hell yeah, just like how some pundits said (was it shebby?), they are 20 goals a season defenders

I'd go for Vidic. Solid at the back, aggressive during set pieces, attacks the ball with such gusto and wins crucial headers

Although i hate to admit i think vidic is the better defender at the moment. Agger is slightly smaller build and has less physical present. But in years to come i think agger will b the better player. He has plenty space to improve. Ps. He has a good sweet left foot.

Vidic can score...

It is no comparison. Both have their strengths, Vida is almost a complete Centre Back, Agger? Nuff said.

well bro, chill la, lets the guys have some fun debating la, well thats what forum are for right? in my opinion both doesnt play similarly n have their own strength, depending how u look at it, well i guess both are equally good la.

aha... I forgot... ok guys!!!! argue away.... sorry bro kenzo... hehehe.. busy reading Anwar's expose on the judiciary scandal...