QUOTE(ayamxxx @ Dec 13 2021, 04:18 PM)
More due to the full time AWD than the engine itself. I read that XV is actually having very good FC despite having full time AWD. But not forester.
Forester vs CX 5, C Seg SUV
|
|
Dec 13 2021, 04:56 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
572 posts Joined: Aug 2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 13 2021, 05:00 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
206 posts Joined: May 2015 |
QUOTE(jaycee1 @ Dec 13 2021, 04:15 PM) Well it depends on how.long you want to keep the car. The boxer 4 tend to be more expensive to maintain in the long term, as well as more parts for the AWD drivetrain. For me, the only reason to get the Forrester is the XT turbo, which we don't get here. Otherwise I would lean on the CX5 if you don't need AWD. QUOTE(ayamxxx @ Dec 13 2021, 04:18 PM) in terms of maintenance yes in long term which is a big unknown and depending on luck as well, unless being well prepared with deep pockets shouldn't be an issue.But with my current situation, having cx5 is a safer bet with some control while trade off some of the safety features which forester doesn't have. Some of the feature is a good to have but it's not mandatory, as I believe cars will have more tech stuff in coming years and more features becoming as standards. in summary I've gone for cx5, park this thread as a reference if any individuals who will face this delima in future. melkishi81 liked this post
|
|
|
Dec 13 2021, 05:47 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,736 posts Joined: Jun 2009 From: Penang |
QUOTE(4WD_er @ Dec 13 2021, 05:56 PM) More due to the full time AWD than the engine itself. Well, is all about your feet control & also the place/traffic your drive. I read that XV is actually having very good FC despite having full time AWD. But not forester. We got member manage to get around 6~7L/100km for latest SK Forester, most of them get it if you can control your rpm around 2k range and on highway speed around 80~110km/h. The previous SJ Forester gen my best record is around 8L/100km, not to bad for such a big SUV with permanent AWD. |
|
|
Dec 13 2021, 05:47 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,117 posts Joined: Jul 2005 From: Penang |
QUOTE(lansi_raju @ Dec 13 2021, 05:00 PM) in terms of maintenance yes in long term which is a big unknown and depending on luck as well, unless being well prepared with deep pockets shouldn't be an issue. which CX-5 did you buy in the end?But with my current situation, having cx5 is a safer bet with some control while trade off some of the safety features which forester doesn't have. Some of the feature is a good to have but it's not mandatory, as I believe cars will have more tech stuff in coming years and more features becoming as standards. in summary I've gone for cx5, park this thread as a reference if any individuals who will face this delima in future. |
|
|
Dec 13 2021, 05:51 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,736 posts Joined: Jun 2009 From: Penang |
QUOTE(lansi_raju @ Dec 13 2021, 06:00 PM) in terms of maintenance yes in long term which is a big unknown and depending on luck as well, unless being well prepared with deep pockets shouldn't be an issue. Good luck with the new purchase. But with my current situation, having cx5 is a safer bet with some control while trade off some of the safety features which forester doesn't have. Some of the feature is a good to have but it's not mandatory, as I believe cars will have more tech stuff in coming years and more features becoming as standards. in summary I've gone for cx5, park this thread as a reference if any individuals who will face this delima in future. Anyway for long term maintenance Mazda is also a mix bag. If your ride got problem especially after warranty, their parts is not cheap to replace also. Within 5 years should be worry free much. This post has been edited by littlefire: Dec 13 2021, 05:56 PM |
|
|
Dec 13 2021, 07:06 PM
Show posts by this member only | IPv6 | Post
#46
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
206 posts Joined: May 2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 13 2021, 07:08 PM
Show posts by this member only | IPv6 | Post
#47
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
206 posts Joined: May 2015 |
QUOTE(littlefire @ Dec 13 2021, 05:51 PM) Good luck with the new purchase. Thanks! If the forester offers 5 yrs free maintenance/parts/labour, i would 100% go for it.Anyway for long term maintenance Mazda is also a mix bag. If your ride got problem especially after warranty, their parts is not cheap to replace also. Within 5 years should be worry free much. Cant brain why forester doesn’t get the same treatment as xv |
|
|
Dec 13 2021, 07:36 PM
Show posts by this member only | IPv6 | Post
#48
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,061 posts Joined: Apr 2010 From: Kuala Lumpur |
melkishi81 liked this post
|
|
|
Dec 13 2021, 08:44 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,117 posts Joined: Jul 2005 From: Penang |
QUOTE(lansi_raju @ Dec 13 2021, 07:06 PM) any reason why not the 2.0L CRV? Its the design right? I mean its ok, I also love the shape...Or is it at least due to handling ?I have tested the CRV but not the CX-5. If I were to based on the comparisons online, I read that CX-5 has even better handling. |
|
|
Dec 13 2021, 11:50 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
206 posts Joined: May 2015 |
QUOTE(lee82gx @ Dec 13 2021, 08:44 PM) any reason why not the 2.0L CRV? Its the design right? I mean its ok, I also love the shape...Or is it at least due to handling ? Crv 2.0 doesn’t have the safety specs with we want, which is no honda sensing. Where the 1.5 turbo has, BUT its out of budgetI have tested the CRV but not the CX-5. If I were to based on the comparisons online, I read that CX-5 has even better handling. |
|
|
Dec 14 2021, 06:26 AM
Show posts by this member only | IPv6 | Post
#51
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,061 posts Joined: Apr 2010 From: Kuala Lumpur |
QUOTE(littlefire @ Dec 13 2021, 05:51 PM) Good luck with the new purchase. It just a typical Japanese car. Parts are average price or similar to any other Japanese car parts price. Brakepad, absorber, spark plug, driveshaft. For brakepad, the most expensive at sc is for honda car, rm700/pair. But low quality when it will get brake juddering issue.Anyway for long term maintenance Mazda is also a mix bag. If your ride got problem especially after warranty, their parts is not cheap to replace also. Within 5 years should be worry free much. |
|
|
Dec 14 2021, 08:09 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,117 posts Joined: Jul 2005 From: Penang |
|
|
|
Dec 14 2021, 09:09 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,736 posts Joined: Jun 2009 From: Penang |
QUOTE(ayamxxx @ Dec 14 2021, 07:26 AM) It just a typical Japanese car. Parts are average price or similar to any other Japanese car parts price. Brakepad, absorber, spark plug, driveshaft. For brakepad, the most expensive at sc is for honda car, rm700/pair. But low quality when it will get brake juddering issue. Well, not accounted with the gearbox & also oil pump low pressure issue if unlucky (VVT issue usually follow with this), engine mounting also usually need to change after 100k. All these are not cheap tho to replace or fix after warranty ends, price is not average bro if went with original Mazda parts. Nowadays Mazda already consider as premium and near to continental part price already as they already push up their standards unless you go for China or other OEM parts. |
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 14 2021, 09:15 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,736 posts Joined: Jun 2009 From: Penang |
QUOTE(lansi_raju @ Dec 13 2021, 08:08 PM) Thanks! If the forester offers 5 yrs free maintenance/parts/labour, i would 100% go for it. If not mistaken you can ask for it, but the car price might be higher as is just add in the maintenance cost over the 5 years into the car price. Cant brain why forester doesn’t get the same treatment as xv Previously when i purchase my Subaru, the sales person give me 2 options 1 is with all the maintenance cost included, while another is just free labor cost. i choose the later as i don't want to loan more money to add up the interest. |
|
|
Dec 14 2021, 09:36 AM
Show posts by this member only | IPv6 | Post
#55
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,061 posts Joined: Apr 2010 From: Kuala Lumpur |
QUOTE(littlefire @ Dec 14 2021, 09:09 AM) Well, not accounted with the gearbox & also oil pump low pressure issue if unlucky (VVT issue usually follow with this), engine mounting also usually need to change after 100k. All these are not cheap tho to replace or fix after warranty ends, price is not average bro if went with original Mazda parts. Nowadays Mazda already consider as premium and near to continental part price already as they already push up their standards unless you go for China or other OEM parts. engine mounting for Honda also not cheap. Rm2.4k+ for engine mounting parts before installation. GB issues with Mazda cz they declare it as seal for life. can resolve it via send it outside to change ATF, so can make it last long. most owner don't change the atf due to above and had issue for mileage >100k kmThis post has been edited by ayamxxx: Dec 14 2021, 09:38 AM |
|
|
Dec 14 2021, 09:50 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,736 posts Joined: Jun 2009 From: Penang |
QUOTE(ayamxxx @ Dec 14 2021, 10:36 AM) engine mounting for Honda also not cheap. Rm2.4k+ for engine mounting parts before installation. GB issues with Mazda cz they declare it as seal for life. can resolve it via send it outside to change ATF, so can make it last long. most owner don't change the atf due to above and had issue for mileage >100k km Yeah, funny thing this ATF change need to be done outside and not official SC. If found tempered, warranty can also void.. |
|
|
Dec 14 2021, 10:09 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
572 posts Joined: Aug 2018 |
|
|
|
Dec 14 2021, 10:15 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
206 posts Joined: May 2015 |
|
|
|
Dec 14 2021, 11:43 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
572 posts Joined: Aug 2018 |
QUOTE(lansi_raju @ Dec 14 2021, 10:15 AM) Not sure, it could also be due to other factors not just i-stop. My subordinate drives about 50km each day to/fro work, 70% highway. I don't think the i-stop was being triggered many times unless it is driven at stop and go traffic. As it's happening so frequent to CX5, just get a charger, charge it once a month, peace of mind.Ya ya, Foxsur. |
|
|
Dec 14 2021, 12:07 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,736 posts Joined: Jun 2009 From: Penang |
QUOTE(lansi_raju @ Dec 14 2021, 11:15 AM) Mazda nowadays using a lot of electrical control items even off the istop also similar outcome, the battery you need to purchase is Q-85 spec. battery which is not cheap. It is an open secret that Mazda battery wont last long, the most around 2 years already consider very lucky.BTW battery & tires is not included in your free maintenance package, so you need to pay for it if warranty limit off. If not mistaken the warranty for the battery is around 1 to 1.5 year or around 20~30k range. After that is yours problem already. This post has been edited by littlefire: Dec 14 2021, 12:18 PM |
| Change to: | 0.0184sec
0.69
5 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 16th December 2025 - 03:26 PM |