Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Forester vs CX 5, C Seg SUV

views
     
TSlansi_raju
post Dec 6 2021, 12:08 PM, updated 5y ago

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
206 posts

Joined: May 2015
So far I've narrowed down 2 C-Seg SUV - family. Subaru Forester & Mazda CX5

The purpose is for long term use (if can tahan till 9 years) and safety features.

Upon specifications, both cars had to be consider in high specs 2.0i-S EyeSight and 2WD High to have the most complete safety features.

Pricing wise about RM150k max but Forester is a 2020 car (5Y warranty only) where CX5 is 2021 (5Y warranty with free service & parts & labor)

Tested Forester indeed drivability is like conti feel due to AWD and it's very solid. But CX5 haven't tested out yet.

Understand that in terms of maintenance/repairability, plan to go for under tree garage for maintenance/repair once out of warranty, will Forester not easy to repair or costly?

What's the advise and what you guys will be choosing between these 2 or any recommendation else than these 2?
TSlansi_raju
post Dec 10 2021, 08:48 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
206 posts

Joined: May 2015
QUOTE(47100 @ Dec 9 2021, 11:00 AM)
got kids? then forestor..
no then cx-5

cx-5 safety aint anywhere close to eyesight..
cx-5 does not have mrcc..
*
i saw cx5 2.0 high spec sheet doesn't have mrcc...i guess only 2.5 spec only has it?
TSlansi_raju
post Dec 10 2021, 08:49 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
206 posts

Joined: May 2015
QUOTE(scorgio @ Dec 8 2021, 08:41 PM)
Forester if priority is handling.

Interior CX5 better.

Both plenty on the road, no trouble in parts sourcing and/or repair.
*
interior is very subjective, so far i like forester interior, conti feel but the a/c vent position is really awkward which is the most annoying part
TSlansi_raju
post Dec 10 2021, 08:53 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
206 posts

Joined: May 2015
QUOTE(lee82gx @ Dec 9 2021, 09:27 PM)
can i confirm with anyone in the know, eye-sight model is now RM150k (only)?
*
yes, 149,788 to be exact quoted by SA. which ori price is 30k more.
downside is it's a 2020 car, but no free service/parts/labor, but with 5 yrs warranty..

you interested as well?
TSlansi_raju
post Dec 10 2021, 11:35 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
206 posts

Joined: May 2015
QUOTE(lee82gx @ Dec 10 2021, 09:27 AM)
Well, the other cars you list don't have free service/parts/labour too i suppose and it may be worth say RM10k over 5 years? 2020 car should be no big deal la.

I couldn't convince my wife to take any non Toyota and Honda car. (I know Subaru is affiliated with Toyota). and 150k is still personally 20k too much for me.

I'm going to swallow the smaller size and either go with Corolla cross, Civic or Corolla.

Its a damn shame that Mazda choose to attach their full ADAS not on CX5. Its like Vincent Tan slapping every customer that goes out the door and giving them a shorter life expectancy, and THEN pocketing the extra change.
*
cross is also one of my shortlist, yet to test drive yet.
but cross is in between B n C seg...but seems cross hybrid which is around 140k with all safety features in it. Doubt if it's on par with forester.
gonna try out the cross then only know
TSlansi_raju
post Dec 10 2021, 11:47 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
206 posts

Joined: May 2015
QUOTE(littlefire @ Dec 10 2021, 11:39 AM)
If safety, corolla cross cant came close to Forester if you pick up with the eyesight system.
Forester is one of the best safety rated suv in Japan & also US if you look into their safety test report.
The only advantage of corolla cross is fuel efficient should be better due to hybrid.
*
speaking of hybrid, battery replacement/parts can be an issue after certain of years, >8 years maybe, although toyota has 8 yrs warranty but issues will come after 8 i guess and it's not cheap (assume few k) to upkeep.
for me, more tech stuffs, more things to upkeep, more $ spend.

still haven't a firm decision yet. gonna test cross, cx5 and forester (again) to make conclusion.

Edit: with the MY road condition, alot of pot holes, etc. forester should be no issue handling it, where cx5 will has issue due to resistance not so strong as forester?

This post has been edited by lansi_raju: Dec 10 2021, 11:57 AM
TSlansi_raju
post Dec 10 2021, 11:55 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
206 posts

Joined: May 2015
QUOTE(WhiteFlag @ Dec 10 2021, 11:52 AM)
majority of comments here choose forrester, but majority of the car on the road is cx5 biggrin.gif
*
haha! CX5 really flooded...
TSlansi_raju
post Dec 13 2021, 04:06 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
206 posts

Joined: May 2015
QUOTE(Mr Mercedes @ Dec 13 2021, 03:57 PM)
Bro, is this the GT Edition?
*
not GT edition.
its eyesight...fyi, GT edition also 30k off..if u wan the SA, i can share u his ctc..PM me if you want
TSlansi_raju
post Dec 13 2021, 05:00 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
206 posts

Joined: May 2015
QUOTE(jaycee1 @ Dec 13 2021, 04:15 PM)
Well it depends on how.long you want to keep the car.

The boxer 4 tend to be more expensive to maintain in the long term, as well as more parts for the AWD drivetrain.
For me, the only reason to get the Forrester is the XT turbo, which we don't get here. Otherwise I would lean on the CX5 if you don't need AWD.
*
QUOTE(ayamxxx @ Dec 13 2021, 04:18 PM)
one i found suprise was the boxer engine FC is not that great vs inline 4 normal engine.
*
in terms of maintenance yes in long term which is a big unknown and depending on luck as well, unless being well prepared with deep pockets shouldn't be an issue.
But with my current situation, having cx5 is a safer bet with some control while trade off some of the safety features which forester doesn't have. Some of the feature is a good to have but it's not mandatory, as I believe cars will have more tech stuff in coming years and more features becoming as standards.

in summary I've gone for cx5, park this thread as a reference if any individuals who will face this delima in future.
TSlansi_raju
post Dec 13 2021, 07:06 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
206 posts

Joined: May 2015
QUOTE(lee82gx @ Dec 13 2021, 05:47 PM)
which CX-5 did you buy in the end?
*
2.0 high spec
TSlansi_raju
post Dec 13 2021, 07:08 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
206 posts

Joined: May 2015
QUOTE(littlefire @ Dec 13 2021, 05:51 PM)
Good luck with the new purchase.
Anyway for long term maintenance Mazda is also a mix bag.
If your ride got problem especially after warranty, their parts is not cheap to replace also.
Within 5 years should be worry free much.
*
Thanks! If the forester offers 5 yrs free maintenance/parts/labour, i would 100% go for it.
Cant brain why forester doesn’t get the same treatment as xv
TSlansi_raju
post Dec 13 2021, 11:50 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
206 posts

Joined: May 2015
QUOTE(lee82gx @ Dec 13 2021, 08:44 PM)
any reason why not the 2.0L CRV? Its the design right? I mean its ok, I also love the shape...Or is it at least due to handling ?

I have tested the CRV but not the CX-5. If I were to based on the comparisons online, I read that CX-5 has even better handling.
*
Crv 2.0 doesn’t have the safety specs with we want, which is no honda sensing. Where the 1.5 turbo has, BUT its out of budget
TSlansi_raju
post Dec 14 2021, 10:15 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
206 posts

Joined: May 2015
QUOTE(4WD_er @ Dec 14 2021, 10:09 AM)
Invest a battery charger, just a Foxur will do.  CX5 is famous on eating battery.

My subordinate changed 2 batteries in 3.5 years of ownership.
*
I've heard this before the root cause of it is due to the istop?
Foxur = Foxsur?

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0609sec    0.77    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 16th December 2025 - 09:25 PM