Military Thread V28
Military Thread V28
|
|
Apr 6 2022, 02:46 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
406 posts Joined: Jun 2007 From: 3°50'**.**"N - 103°16'**.**"E |
imin liked this post
|
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 8 2022, 05:07 AM
Show posts by this member only | IPv6 | Post
#2382
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
901 posts Joined: Feb 2012 |
|
|
|
Apr 9 2022, 09:06 PM
Show posts by this member only | IPv6 | Post
#2383
|
![]()
Junior Member
40 posts Joined: Sep 2009 From: under the moonlight |
QUOTE(cunnilinguist @ Apr 2 2022, 07:48 PM) Didn't Airod have extra C-130s lying around. Better absorb these C-130s before buying anything else problem with absorbing these white tailed C-130 is that it still require us congress approval. afaik one of them is practically a wreck before airod did their magic. pretty impressive to be able to turn a written off plane to a flyable one but I doubt the AF wanted it. Fucking flip didn't want them and these people would take anything, like third hand ANG C-130 or luftwaffe UH-1BAlso i think we should look for the likes of Il-76 or Globemaster III or C-2 Baby Globemaster III Also >C-17 Prolly too big for our need >C-2 Literally A400M with turbofan engines. And I'd rather have more A400M >Il-76 CAATSA. besides Pakistan bought them and are less than pleased with the performance. The only reason why they bought them is because they're being blocked from getting KC-135 or Airbus MRTT and Y-20 wasn't a thing yet back then. Also prolly too big for our need QUOTE(darth5zaft @ Apr 3 2022, 02:39 PM) Don't think AIROD has spare c130. got. airod have couple white-tailed C-130 for saleBut them European do have lots of spare as they replaced it with a400. |
|
|
Apr 10 2022, 07:51 PM
Show posts by this member only | IPv6 | Post
#2384
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
901 posts Joined: Feb 2012 |
QUOTE(ayanami_tard @ Apr 9 2022, 09:06 PM) problem with absorbing these white tailed C-130 is that it still require us congress approval. afaik one of them is practically a wreck before airod did their magic. pretty impressive to be able to turn a written off plane to a flyable one but I doubt the AF wanted it. Fucking flip didn't want them and these people would take anything, like third hand ANG C-130 or luftwaffe UH-1B Like you said before, TUDM has lots of transport aircraft, even higher than other neighboring countries. The high usage is probably due as atreyuangel says, RMN lost their transportation capabilities.Also >C-17 Prolly too big for our need >C-2 Literally A400M with turbofan engines. And I'd rather have more A400M >Il-76 CAATSA. besides Pakistan bought them and are less than pleased with the performance. The only reason why they bought them is because they're being blocked from getting KC-135 or Airbus MRTT and Y-20 wasn't a thing yet back then. Also prolly too big for our need got. airod have couple white-tailed C-130 for sale Anyway the RMN booth at DCA put the MRSS spefication as a 210 meter long vessel which put it about as big as type 071, San Diego or dokdo. Thought the length & width they give do fit type 071 like a gloves. |
|
|
Apr 10 2022, 08:27 PM
|
![]()
Newbie
4 posts Joined: Jan 2012 |
Indonesian Air Force 76th Anniversary - April 9th 2022.
![]() |
|
|
Apr 10 2022, 08:31 PM
|
![]()
Newbie
4 posts Joined: Jan 2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 10 2022, 08:44 PM
|
![]()
Newbie
4 posts Joined: Jan 2012 |
![]() C-705 missile of the Indonesian Navy at Batuporon naval base. Photo source: Wiki QUOTE 05 APRIL 2022 Indonesia establishes consortium to reverse engineer anti-ship missile by Ridzwan Rahmat ![]() A mock-up of the C-705 medium-range anti-ship missile. Indonesia has established a consortium to reverse engineer an anti-ship missile and, based on an image released by the Indonesian Ministry of Defense, it is strongly believed to be the C-705, which closely resembles the weapon type. (Janes/Patrick Allen) An Indonesian consortium mainly comprising state-owned enterprises has been established to reverse engineer an anti-ship missile type with a view of establishing the capability in-country. The consortium is led by the Indonesian Ministry of Defense's (MoD's) Directorate for Technology and Defense Industry and includes state-owned enterprises namely aerospace company PT Dirgantara Indonesia, defence electronics enterprise PT Len, explosives manufacturer PT Dahana, and heavy vehicles and ammunition producer PT Pindad. Meanwhile, the two private enterprises that have been named as part of the consortium are defence software company PT Mulia Laksana Utama and unmanned aerial vehicles manufacturer PT Aero Terra Indonesia. An agreement to formalise the consortium was signed on 1 April, the Indonesian MoD said in a statement on 2 April. Among matters that were formalised include the scope of work that each company will be involved in and the tests and certification processes that will be carried out at various stages of the weapon's dismantling. Read more: https://www.janes.com/defence-news/news-det...ti-ship-missile This post has been edited by azriel: Apr 10 2022, 08:56 PM |
|
|
Apr 11 2022, 03:09 PM
|
![]()
Junior Member
41 posts Joined: Sep 2013 |
|
|
|
Apr 13 2022, 05:22 PM
|
![]()
Newbie
3 posts Joined: Feb 2014 |
Any updates about the army getting additional PT-91 tanks?
Is it related to the news about the disappearance of 100 PT-91 from Poland inventory? |
|
|
Apr 13 2022, 05:29 PM
Show posts by this member only | IPv6 | Post
#2390
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
227 posts Joined: Feb 2019 From: Cherasboy |
|
|
|
Apr 13 2022, 05:31 PM
|
![]()
Junior Member
42 posts Joined: Feb 2010 |
Polish one not the same as ours ... they most likely goes to Ukraine
|
|
|
Apr 13 2022, 06:12 PM
Show posts by this member only | IPv6 | Post
#2392
|
![]()
Junior Member
40 posts Joined: Sep 2009 From: under the moonlight |
QUOTE(cunnilinguist @ Apr 13 2022, 06:22 PM) kinda sceptical abt the news but if it does materialize, i hope we get an upgraded version with 3rd gen thermal and CITVeven as is the Pendekar can be considered as the best T-72, and that even when compared to indian T-90S QUOTE(cunnilinguist @ Apr 13 2022, 06:22 PM) xde kaitan |
|
|
Apr 13 2022, 06:14 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
227 posts Joined: Feb 2019 From: Cherasboy |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 13 2022, 06:41 PM
Show posts by this member only | IPv6 | Post
#2394
|
![]()
Junior Member
40 posts Joined: Sep 2009 From: under the moonlight |
|
|
|
Apr 13 2022, 06:50 PM
Show posts by this member only | IPv6 | Post
#2395
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
152 posts Joined: Mar 2007 From: somewhere in PJ |
wonder would us ask malaysia to trade-in PT-91 with M1A2?
|
|
|
Apr 13 2022, 06:55 PM
Show posts by this member only | IPv6 | Post
#2396
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
227 posts Joined: Feb 2019 From: Cherasboy |
QUOTE(ayanami_tard @ Apr 13 2022, 06:41 PM) The only thing that T-72B3 have is better base armor (T-72B>T-72M). Otherwise Pendekar is better. The B3 Obr 2016 also has longer and newer ammo, better ERA, and a better sight - not sure about other parts.Is T-90ms even exist beyond prototypes? I think India bought some 90MS. This post has been edited by KLthinker91: Apr 13 2022, 06:56 PM |
|
|
Apr 13 2022, 07:03 PM
Show posts by this member only | IPv6 | Post
#2397
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,222 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Penang |
|
|
|
Apr 13 2022, 07:04 PM
Show posts by this member only | IPv6 | Post
#2398
|
![]()
Junior Member
40 posts Joined: Sep 2009 From: under the moonlight |
QUOTE(James831 @ Apr 13 2022, 07:50 PM) kekek better get T-80U if like that. both use turbine engineQUOTE(KLthinker91 @ Apr 13 2022, 07:55 PM) The B3 Obr 2016 also has longer and newer ammo, better ERA, and a better sight - not sure about other parts. >eraI think India bought some 90MS. It still uses Kontakt-5 which is comparable to Erawa-2. Even when compared to Erawa, I'd argue Erawa is better because it fits the tanks better and leave no huge gaps between blocks >better sights better compared to older T-72B maybe. T-72B3 still didnt have MRS and no auto target lock. target lead only. T-90M has auto target lock |
|
|
Apr 13 2022, 08:11 PM
Show posts by this member only | IPv6 | Post
#2399
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
227 posts Joined: Feb 2019 From: Cherasboy |
QUOTE(ayanami_tard @ Apr 13 2022, 07:04 PM) kekek better get T-80U if like that. both use turbine engine No, the T72 Obr 2016 uses Relikt (when it's not sandbags anyway...), and the Erawa-2 is said to be inferior to Kontakt-5 by the way. Look up assessments of the Polish tank fleet.>era It still uses Kontakt-5 which is comparable to Erawa-2. Even when compared to Erawa, I'd argue Erawa is better because it fits the tanks better and leave no huge gaps between blocks >better sights better compared to older T-72B maybe. T-72B3 still didnt have MRS and no auto target lock. target lead only. T-90M has auto target lock The Sosna-U supposedly has better range, but on 2nd thought, I dunno, maybe on par with the Savan 15. |
|
|
Apr 14 2022, 01:03 PM
Show posts by this member only | IPv6 | Post
#2400
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
901 posts Joined: Feb 2012 |
|
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0440sec
0.62
6 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 4th December 2025 - 11:00 AM |