QUOTE(weissPC @ Nov 16 2020, 03:56 PM)
Read the news article - she has proof from phone company records and also dashcam that points inside the car to prove she was not using the phone - police got what? I don't think police have telephoto lens camera to take photo of her.
Phone calls not necessarily need to be through sim cards nowadays and using phone doesn't necessarily means making phone calls.
The dash cam was bought after the incident.
QUOTE(KLthinker91 @ Nov 16 2020, 04:03 PM)
That's the point, numskull, where's the proof the police have that the woman has committed a crime?
This case highlights the fact that the police are issuing summons based on literally zero evidence, a direct contradiction of one of the most fundamental concepts of law:
the burden of proof is on the accuser, aka presumption of innocenceYeah I was pointing at that too. Both side don't have direct evidence. But if during the trial, the police and his colleague testifies for the case, she will have any witnesses. Added on top, if they check her smartphone, they could easily find evidence pointing to that period where she sends messages on WhatsApp/Instagram/Facebook. If she did check it within 30 minutes to 1 hour time frame prior to she was stopped, does it count?