Our telcos are already building their fibre networks quietly in preparation for fiberization of 5G/4G LTE-A base stations since late 2018 just that they don't want to complete the stretch to homes and premises.

Maxis for example has been planting fibre all over major cities across Malaysia like this:

https://malaysiafiber.blogspot.com/2019/04/...-broadband.html

https://malaysiafiber.blogspot.com/2019/04/...-broadband.html

Banks and large corporations can subscribe DIA(direct internet leased circuits) if they can afford it.

Actually 5G and fibre broadband investments don't clash with each other. Both of them cater for different array of consumers.
For example, are we going to use 5G as the corporate office backbone network where thousands are connecting to the same network concurrently?
Are we going to expect 5G to cover the connectivity that needs extremely low latency like the banking network system or online gaming?
5G experiments of data rates varies greatly across different countries. 

5G afaik is a much better version of WIFI than current 4G with much wider coverage. And that is all to it. Also, the adoption will mean that new equipment like new phones or devices are needed to connect to 5G network.

The ISP that solely relies on 3/4/5G alone are doomed to saturate themselves with smaller and smaller pie for themselves. 

Personally I prefer the fixed-line fibre broadband for stability and always-on connectivity.

Yes that's why I mentioned earlier they acted in silos. The fiberisation efforts are minimal and limited in scope as compared to our wide area of land mass and population.
That's the reason they still receive complaints after complaints from home fibre broadband customers because these telcos still rely on TM infrastructure.

And that's more of the justification to form a consortium among themselves to compete against TM together with TIME and TNB Allo.

After months of "fighting", waiting and report to MCMC, finally TM "manage" to make my "dummy address" available and I am able to register Celcom Fiber.. Today TM lay new fibre to my house and Celcom come to configure the router.. Fiber up and running.. currently waiting to change my IP to public..

Celcom 300Mbps:

After months of "fighting", waiting and report to MCMC, finally TM "manage" to make my "dummy address" available and I am able to register Celcom Fiber.. Today TM lay new fibre to my house and Celcom come to configure the router.. Fiber up and running.. currently waiting to change my IP to public..

Celcom 300Mbps:

It seems so. Because TM do not allow 2 services running at the same time on their infra. That's why nowadays cannot run Maxis and Unifi at the same house anymore.

Do Celcom provide public IP?

Do Celcom provide public IP?

What is your review for Celcom? Good so far?

Speedtest reveals you're getting slightly more than your subscribed speed.

so far so good.. Torrent is working straight away, good speed as well. Game ping is almost similar with last time I use Unifi..

You taking that RM129 300M 6 months rebate offer?

What router they gave you? TP-Link AX-10 WiFi 6 router?

Yes, the router is TP-Link AX1500.. Im not really use wifi6 because my PC and laptop dont have wifi6 support. My main PC always use LAN cable.. laptop for opis work so normal wifi is enough..

Im never heard that promo, currently my plan is RM 119 for first  3 months..after that RM140..

during transition period also cannot?

for example if i want to terminate unifi and sign up celcom, cannot have celcom connected before i terminated unifi? like that will have downtime rite?

worst case if one's area has fibre ports full, during the transition if terminate unifi first, the port maybe taken by others rite?

You have to use porting process. That is you register with new provider and submit transfer ID to TM. Your Unifi will run until the day the new ISP comes and install the service. It's like MNP.

I see. Thanks.

For DiGi, needs to go to DiGi store to do rite?

Same for celcom?

The decision is quite silly actually then, why in the first place they supply a 4-port fibre modem(ONT) to customers then if their policy is only to restrict 1 ISP per premise.

Even Google Fiber Jack, France SFR, TNB Allo also supply single port mini ONT only to their customers.

4-port fibre modem(ONT) more opportunity to pocket money in tenders?

The reason why Nucleus Connect Singapore provides a 4 port ONT(only 4 ethernet ports with no phone jacks)  was because they allowed upto 4 simultaneous ISPs per fibre modem each supplying their own routers.

If you only allow 1 ISP per premise at any time, why you supply a 4 port ONT?
This contradicts the reason between both ways.

Just be frank, they don't want customers to switch easily and they want to monopolize the line prioritizing their own Unifi brand.

The other reason is that Unifi routers will use port 1 of the 4 ports while other competing ISPs use port 2.
Port 1 will be capped higher than your subscribe plan while port 2 which is for other ISPs will always be capped exactly as your subscribed plan giving you a "buffer bloat" effect which results in speeds lower than what you subscribe because of TCP overheads.

If they were to be like TNB allo all ISPs including its own City Broadband use only 1 single ethernet port, then everyone gets the same treatment and rule without the "buffer bloat" condition which only applies to ethernet port 2. 

These are TM's dirty monopolistic tricks to make their own Unifi brand look better than its competitors sharing their network.

The decision is quite silly actually then, why in the first place they supply a 4-port fibre modem(ONT) to customers then if their policy is only to restrict 1 ISP per premise.

Even Google Fiber Jack, France SFR, TNB Allo also supply single port mini ONT only to their customers.

4-port fibre modem(ONT) more opportunity to pocket money in tenders?

The reason why Nucleus Connect Singapore provides a 4 port ONT(only 4 ethernet ports with no phone jacks)  was because they allowed upto 4 simultaneous ISPs per fibre modem each supplying their own routers.

If you only allow 1 ISP per premise at any time, why you supply a 4 port ONT?
This contradicts the reason between both ways.

Just be frank, they don't want customers to switch easily and they want to monopolize the line prioritizing their own Unifi brand.

The other reason is that Unifi routers will use port 1 of the 4 ports while other competing ISPs use port 2.
Port 1 will be capped higher than your subscribe plan while port 2 which is for other ISPs will always be capped exactly as your subscribed plan giving you a "buffer bloat" effect which results in speeds lower than what you subscribe because of TCP overheads.

If they were to be like TNB allo all ISPs including its own City Broadband use only 1 single ethernet port, then everyone gets the same treatment and rule without the "buffer bloat" condition which only applies to ethernet port 2. 

These are TM's dirty monopolistic tricks to make their own Unifi brand look better than its competitors sharing their network.

then the nucleus connect model was "scrapped" later.. isps preferred to pool their resources at layer 1 (lastmile dark fibre) rather than layer 2/3 (common OLT). in the first place sg has guaranteed 2 fibre strands and port per household, so its possible to have 2 ONT running simultaneously (and up to 10gbps each)