Indeed - but that was the source of a mini debate in its own right, whether or not anyone on a forum such as this one, owes anyone else an explanation or justification of any sort? At the end of the day, I believe the consensus - or at least a working understanding - was that if the challenge was issued by a skeptical member (or a member with a severe case of derriere dolores) against another person, then, no justification is required on the part of the person being challenged. However, if someone has been claiming certain things, then it befalls that person to back up the claim.

And I think that's a fair compromise.

Siapa suruh layan orang giler mcm ladytarrot tu. Dah la jantan

So ladytarot reply alrdy or no???? Lazy to search backpage

ladytarot99 did claim a lot of things as far i can remember. Ultra rich, RR, private jet, multi millions etc.

I don't quite get you. You mean to say she should or should not back up her claims?

30 page still no doxx.

Sadding.

Wtf

From just 1 page to 30 page

ts, for your stewpidity that i facepalms, i will...

bump for the lulz.

Keep going guys

such as me

Good analysis

This is my personal opinion - and I believe it was quite clearly articulated.

Originally, I was of the opinion that it wasn't obligatory - since this is the internet, and I shouldn't have to offer an explanation to justify anything to anyone. However, as @bearbearwong pointed out in a later reply, "men of substance" should not let a challenge go unanswered (apologies for the paraphrase) - and on reflection, he does have a point.

As an example, I off-handedly mentioned a certain sum of money that my wife keeps stashed away in cash form (in the larger context of an on-going discussion), in the house safe. @fun_feng then essentially said (pardon the pun play) "show me the money". Now, since I was the big-mouthed idiot that brought up the subject, then I feel it is incumbent on me to back up my claim - which, as per a gentleman's agreement (to which @fun_feng has indeed honoured, much to his credit), occurred as promised.

However, if I were talking about matters of finance and sharing my (admittedly layperson-level) know-how, and someone rocks up and challenges me to prove to him that I should be taken seriously - by showing him my bank balance, or the stash of cash, or how many gold bars I have in the vault, or whatever, then, for all intents and purposes, he can take a hike off the edge of the nearest cliff.

I hope this explanation has helped to further clarify my stance.

This post has been edited by hksgmy: May 13 2020, 05:59 PM

So if I understand correctly. You are saying ladytarot99 SHOULD show proof to back up her ultra rich claims?

This isn't the first time a female has opened her own thread offering tarot advice and 4D prediction.
Rebirth with new persona?


https://forum.lowyat.net/topic/4338292/+80

I got a feeling lady actually has a stick!

This post has been edited by adam09: May 13 2020, 06:06 PM

Congratulations ladytarot99 your fan club > 30 pages of posts!

Circle jerking one another to reinforce the storyline so that the group doesn’t fall apart.

I think in an internet forum where anonymity is provided to users, anyone who volunteers personal information and does so unsolicited should be prepared to be challenged on those claims. Whether you back it up or not is up to you but it certainly begs the question of why bother sharing so much personal info in the first place especially when the claims made are out of the ordinary by forum standards.

yall cringey af. this is online forum. what tok with the man of substance and unchallenged shits.

just take everything with a grain of salt, and dont worship online persona la. wtf.

Is attending diplomatic parties out of the ordinary? Some ktards do attend such parties as guests of the embassies and have pictures to provide it..

So, it’s not a stretch when someone claims to own a RR or is ultra rich.. just my two cents. What do I know anyways. Am just an ordinary middle class Malaysian.

i want to doxx u billy because u so bear bear