Sustainability is based on projection only, not guaranteed.
Sustainability depends on 2 issues.
1. COI incremental, which may be more than what had projected.
2. Return of ILP if poorer than projected.
Then the sustainability is affected.
Yes, ILP has its good side.
But at the same times, there is nothing wrong to look on negative side of story, nobody want to find out something bad after contributed more than 10 or 20 years then later found out something is not as good as previous sweet talk.
ILP can make a loss instead of projected gain to sustain the policy.
Nobody can deny potential of negativity of ILP which may happen, and it does happen especially recently, some funds are making poor return, some even losses, due to unfavourable market condition.
With interest rate worldwide are mostly near zero, it may even tougher job for funds to generate good return as previous 10 years ago.
Look at both good and potential bad side of ILP, then only make a decision on it, as insurance is long term commitment.
Yeap I agree that ILP is investment risk based therefore projection can be higher or lower unless its a low risk fund. There is also a risk that entire profile is wiped out as well.
Just my take that certain individual are only mentioning the negative side only in the forum or elsewhere without weighing its good benefits.
A discussion can only be healthy when both good and bad are mentioned.