Outline ·
[ Standard ] ·
Linear+
Intel Pentium Dual Core E2140/E2160/E2180 Thread, Discussion & Compilation
|
tech_frix
|
Mar 13 2008, 02:07 PM
|
|
QUOTE(suicideroach @ Mar 13 2008, 01:59 PM) @techfrix Wahhh.. aku ingat sapa la yg pakai avatar kucing tu..ko rupenyeh @heizad i saw ACF7 selling for RM110 before, but can't remember where i've seen it  hahaha...kucing garang tu!!! nyway bro heizad, if u planning to spend more than RM110, better amek CM tu...
|
|
|
|
|
|
heizad
|
Mar 13 2008, 02:10 PM
|
|
kene carik buyer ram dulu la
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bigblock
|
Mar 13 2008, 02:18 PM
|
|
QUOTE(heizad @ Mar 13 2008, 02:10 PM) kene carik buyer ram dulu la  Cooler very important for OC la bro's...ada cooling chun ok dah.I wanna ask anyone here with the newer E2160 say you bought it lesser than 3 weeks ago? anyone here with newer MO chips? This post has been edited by Bigblock: Mar 13 2008, 02:19 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
heizad
|
Mar 13 2008, 02:22 PM
|
|
mine bought on 12th feb..i month edi
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bigblock
|
Mar 13 2008, 02:25 PM
|
|
QUOTE(heizad @ Mar 13 2008, 02:22 PM) mine bought on 12th feb..i month edi You can do 400fsb*8=3200? My pc dun seem to boot at all at higher fsb ad... Can play with *9 more better....of coz my chip dun oc too well also... needs alot of vcore pump sial...stock vcore can go max 2944ghz.... After tht very tricky for me ad...dunno why...now no time to play on the proc also...
|
|
|
|
|
|
heizad
|
Mar 13 2008, 02:29 PM
|
|
i tried 400*9=3600 and got bsod at logon screen
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bigblock
|
Mar 13 2008, 02:31 PM
|
|
QUOTE(heizad @ Mar 13 2008, 02:29 PM) i tried 400*9=3600 and got bsod at logon screen  Bro for tht u need more than 1.5vcore...tht too if you hav a gem chip it will boot fine lo See if yours can go 400*8 dear bro? May i know what board your using?
|
|
|
|
|
|
heizad
|
Mar 13 2008, 02:33 PM
|
|
QUOTE(Bigblock @ Mar 13 2008, 02:31 PM) Bro for tht u need more than 1.5vcore...tht too if you hav a gem chip it will boot fine lo See if yours can go 400*8 dear bro? May i know what board your using? abit ip35-e  will try 400*8 later..
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bigblock
|
Mar 13 2008, 02:35 PM
|
|
QUOTE(heizad @ Mar 13 2008, 02:33 PM) abit ip35-e  will try 400*8 later.. Ok chun bro....mine at all cannot boot at high fsb..yet to know y..something is wrong sumwher...need to check...
|
|
|
|
|
|
bryanyeo87
|
Mar 13 2008, 03:14 PM
|
|
QUOTE(Bigblock @ Mar 13 2008, 02:35 PM) Ok chun bro....mine at all cannot boot at high fsb..yet to know y..something is wrong sumwher...need to check... thats because the NBCC is running at a higher fsb then reported in cpuz when you lower the multi down.
|
|
|
|
|
|
a1098113
|
Mar 13 2008, 04:24 PM
|
|
hows everything boyss... hey bryan bro, back to lend us some master skills  ill be back home in a bit, i am at uni now. I am gonna strip down my rig to get an x38 soon.
|
|
|
|
|
|
heizad
|
Mar 13 2008, 04:29 PM
|
|
just sell me ur hyper 212 la bro
|
|
|
|
|
|
suicideroach
|
Mar 13 2008, 04:31 PM
|
|
QUOTE(bryanyeo87 @ Mar 13 2008, 03:14 PM) thats because the NBCC is running at a higher fsb then reported in cpuz when you lower the multi down. NBCC? sorry for my noobness
|
|
|
|
|
|
tech_frix
|
Mar 13 2008, 04:51 PM
|
|
QUOTE(a1098113 @ Mar 13 2008, 04:24 PM) hows everything boyss... hey bryan bro, back to lend us some master skills  ill be back home in a bit, i am at uni now. I am gonna strip down my rig to get an x38 soon. bro, bout d v10 bios for IP35-E... so what can u conclude?? is it better than v14?? how bout v15??
|
|
|
|
|
|
a1098113
|
Mar 13 2008, 05:57 PM
|
|
yeah bout this BIOS 10, it doesnt post any prob and in fact its pretty sweet on the VCore coz i posted lower Vcores with this Revision. Startup times are very very quick.. i mean fast loading times for the Windows...
So yeah ill try to get a report and post it on our team site.
|
|
|
|
|
|
heizad
|
Mar 13 2008, 06:05 PM
|
|
means that it's better than v14? i'm interested to try it...
|
|
|
|
|
|
a1098113
|
Mar 13 2008, 06:06 PM
|
|
yes heck alot beter than v14 lol.. honestly the first bioses are often less complicated
|
|
|
|
|
|
heizad
|
Mar 13 2008, 06:12 PM
|
|
will give a try then...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bigblock
|
Mar 13 2008, 06:15 PM
|
|
QUOTE(bryanyeo87 @ Mar 13 2008, 03:14 PM) thats because the NBCC is running at a higher fsb then reported in cpuz when you lower the multi down. Bro care to explain more on this please?  Added on March 13, 2008, 6:17 pmQUOTE(a1098113 @ Mar 13 2008, 04:24 PM) hows everything boyss... hey bryan bro, back to lend us some master skills  ill be back home in a bit, i am at uni now. I am gonna strip down my rig to get an x38 soon. Woahh bro will tht be an X38 quad GT? This post has been edited by Bigblock: Mar 13 2008, 06:17 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
a1098113
|
Mar 13 2008, 06:34 PM
|
|
i believe bryan is trying to say that if u use lower multipliers, u will need to push up the Vmch. maybe this is what he is trying to say...
Yeah maybe but Abit quadgt has a problem with the Digital PWM.
|
|
|
|
|