QUOTE(Jordy @ Jul 17 2008, 09:19 PM)
Please do not mix up REITs with the other common stocks. REITs are required by law to distribute at least 90% of their net income to the unitholders. REITs work differently from the common stocks as well. They do not have to seek unitholders approval before deciding to make any property acquisitions. Also, once they secured the property, they would lease it out for an agreed term and receive rental as income. So, it is more secured compared to the other common stocks 
Yup, that's why I opt for some reits lately because even in economy difficult time, as long as those property under the reit is having long term tenants especially from strong corporate company, then income is somehow secure and won't be affected by other factor as compared to normal property stocks. So yield is pretty known and highly predictable and secured. As long as those yield is 2x of normal FD rate, I am somehow ok with it.As normal property stock, if others subsidiaries of company (especially those from building sector) are doing poorly, then it might drag the whole group in term of profitability wise. Another one issue is that under the reit, profit must be distributed which will be only good for minoirty shareholders like ours. Unlike normal property stocks, even if company make tons of profit, but they can decide to keep it in the company forever even in cash form without any investment, while only give tiny bit of dividend to the shareholders.
Reit is like buying a property and rent it out. While in normal property stocks, you are participating in the company as shareholder, so totally different risk.
But downside of reit, they have not much room for the upside because of profit wise is stagnant and grows relative slow (rental increment won't be fast, and rental amount only can be negotiable after the tenants renew their lease) even if economy is good time, unlike those common stock, price can shoot up 2x 3x in good time.
Jul 17 2008, 09:43 PM
Quote
0.0276sec
0.89
6 queries
GZIP Disabled