QUOTE(gerald7 @ Jan 15 2025, 08:25 AM)
Yup, i also asked before, they said the logic is sound, but they said better dont. Just purely from a claims perspective, as the management will find every little detail to deny claims.
Ya, logically it is bullshit to say dashcam hardwire can void warranty. It don't make sense but the warranty manual that shield the car manufacturer gives them the right to void related warranties that can relate to 3rd party installation.Normally, even if do, SC ignore and the skip those warranty conditions and continue doing claim as it logically is not the cause of those warranty claim failure.
However for eg. Car Manufacturer might react differently to this logic. Oh....you touch this area, it might NOT be the cause but since you touch that area when it is not allow, we void warranty for that area and save ourself a bundle.
You can appeal that is not the logical cause of the failure (more than likely it is not) BUT the warranty manual will back the SC up....no 3rd party installation or else they can void. So the ball is in their court.
You might argue hard on this cause it is obvious the cause of failure might not be the 3rd party installation (or you can say 100% not that), but legal clause of the warranty manual will side with the car manufacturer.
What most cowardly ppl like us would like to avoid is such case as above. It likely would never happen to us but when it does, we are screwed if the warranty claims are costly one...
What is insurance then....this is one of such logic, you want to be insured, don't do it. You don't mind risking not buying medical insurance (most likely nothing happen and you save a bundle by not paying super high insurance premium), then go ahead and likely you are the winner....but when shits happened....then you might be screwed. But if you can afford to be screwed, then go ahead, I do that as well, at least with my so-called 3rd party tint..
So most ppl who don't want risk decide to buy the insurance but many others that willing to bear the risk, just not pay...and enjoy the money save over the years....if nothing happen. That's the logic I am arguing to.
If this is Honda of old, I would do install it....as I did on my last Honda decades ago. But with all the news of Honda rejecting even minor bits of claims if that area was reported to them in claim report as having 3rd party installation. I become a proponent of avoid warranty issues if you can afford it. I am using Honda as example cause I am still mainly Hondas owner.
This is not arguing of what logic is right or if there are any real cases or not. That will side with logic aka no issue with 3rd party dashcam installation but for any warranty claims dispute, it will almost ALWAYS side with the car manufacturer when 3rd party item are involved.
This post has been edited by Cavino: Jan 15 2025, 01:40 PM
Jan 15 2025, 11:37 AM

Quote
0.1433sec
0.81
7 queries
GZIP Disabled