QUOTE(crazymouse_yyh @ May 28 2007, 10:45 PM)
The license in a way is just a safety precaution when your dog accidentally strays away or so happen the authorities pass by your house.... they do not have the power to shoot the dogs unless they are aggressive.
even if the dogs arent aggressive, and they still shoot the dogs,we cant say anything,can we? i've never heard of council members being charged with killing an innocent dog before in my life.
it's always "the dogs were violent,so we had to shoot them"-and they get away with it without any kind of investigation whatsoever
QUOTE(crazymouse_yyh @ May 28 2007, 10:45 PM)
But another reason is the right space for dogs. The rule is not set by the council without research. Sometimes the compound is only suitable for 2 dogs but keeping four, the dogs can't really move about easily and may have a boring life without much space to play and explore.... so that is another reason bout the limit.
That's what I do
that's what i feel is unfair.That's what I do
they say max per house hold is 2/4 dogs.
they dont go into specifics and mention if that is for large/small breeds.
they just round all up as "dogs".
how can one compare a pomeranian to a st bernard?
May 28 2007, 11:16 PM

Quote
0.0216sec
0.56
5 queries
GZIP Disabled