Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
7 Pages < 1 2 3 4 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 LYN Christian Fellowship V14 (Group)

views
     
thomasthai
post Aug 20 2018, 05:09 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
321 posts

Joined: Apr 2012
QUOTE
For I have come down from heaven, not to do My own will, but the will of Him who sent Me.
John 6:38 NASB
https://bible.com/bible/100/jhn.6.38.NASB


The verse is meaningless if Jesus is the Father.

If Jesus is the Father, you can only draw 2 conclusions from this verse.

1) Jesus is delusional, he does not know he is the Father
2) Jesus is lying. He knows he is the father but he is trying to deceive his audience.

We know God by the plain revelation of the scripture. I think both OT and NT go through a lot just to reveal that God is indeed One in Three Persons. Otherwise all those verses do not make any sense.

The danger here is you build your own theology based on your own logic, which I dont think is being faithful to scripture.

Ok no more from me on the matter.
thomasthai
post Aug 20 2018, 06:20 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
321 posts

Joined: Apr 2012
QUOTE(Haledoch @ Aug 20 2018, 06:03 PM)
Are you a true reformist or a fake one? Even Charles Spurgeon the famous Calvinist agreed that Jesus Christ IS Jehovah. Go dig google.
*
Jehovah is not the name of the Father.

Jehovah is simply a derived tetragramaton of YHWH, or I AM. (Jehovah witnesses cant seem to understand this)

Jesus is I AM, the Father is I AM, the Spirit is I AM.

But Jesus is not the Father, and the Father is not the Spirit, and the Spirit is not Jesus.

All plain revelation of scripture.

This post has been edited by thomasthai: Aug 20 2018, 06:21 PM
thomasthai
post Aug 21 2018, 05:16 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
321 posts

Joined: Apr 2012
QUOTE(Haledoch @ Aug 20 2018, 07:44 PM)
Ohh now you are saying Jehovah is 3 persons?
Do you mean Jesus Christ is 3 persons?
Or are you still adamant Jesus is not Jehovah? Who should I believe you or Charles Spurgeon?

Make up your mind. You are making the trinity doctrine looks bad.
*
Funny you keep mentioning charles spurgeon. The spurgeon i know is a trinitarian laugh.gif

Heres a quote from him
QUOTE
We can never understand how Father, Son, and Holy Spirit can be three and yet one. For my part, I have long ago given up any desire to understand this great mystery, for I am perfectly satisfied that, if I could understand it, it would not be true, because God, from the very nature of things, must be incomprehensible." ~ Charles H. Spurgeon


The great theologians after the reformation (spurgeon, ji packer, bb warfield, aw tozer, arthur pink, cs lewis) are all trinitarians, and would consider unitarian views a heresy.

Another quote from spurgeon
QUOTE
The longer I live, the clearer does it appear that John Calvin’s system is the nearest to perfection.


I thought you are anti calvinist? How are you reading spurgeon?

Answering your question, dont believe me, believe spurgeon, i am nowhere near him laugh.gif

This post has been edited by thomasthai: Aug 21 2018, 05:28 AM
thomasthai
post Aug 21 2018, 06:32 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
321 posts

Joined: Apr 2012
QUOTE(pehkay @ Aug 20 2018, 10:02 PM)
Hahaha ... The Lord likened Himself to a vine tree (grapevine). Definitely not a tall tree. *wink*. I am glad the Bible is not a book of botany tongue.gif

Unfortunately I don't tend to use the number analogies biggrin.gif but I will agree with you that Unitarians lacked the understanding (or choose to ignore) in two points:

1) confuse the biblical distinction between the ontological Trinity and the economic Trinity, conflate the two concepts into one, and thus assign the characteristics of the economic Trinity to the ontological Trinity.

2) do not believe in the coexistence (exists essentially at the same time eternally) (Matthew 3:16-17) and coinherence (John 14:11) of the Father, the Son, and the Spirit. The mutual indwelling of Person within one another is one aspect of the oneness. There is no physical representation for this.

They (Uni) tend to share only the FULL force of one side of the truth. A fair person will list out the FULL force of both sides & let the text speaks for itself.

I will be fair that ordinary Christians (and even theologians) subconsciously having tritheistic tendencies (Wayne Grudem, Systematic Theology: ...). They do not differentiate that Triune God is distinct yet not separate. The Father, Son, and Holy Spirit as three distinct centers of consciousness and volition, or "I’s," eternally involved in loving subject-object relationship. For example, commenting on John 10:30 (“I and the Father are one”). Yet, the modern usage of "person" (vs the ancient use) cannot be stretched too far.
When the full force of both sides is displayed, one will see the Threeness in His immanent one Being and the oneness in the economical aspect of three. One will even see the "modalistic" identification of the Father and Son (Isa 9:6) and Son and Spirit (1 Cor 15:45; 2 Cor 3:17) because these are economical verses. Instance after instance that the three of the trinity, while distinct in their respective hypostases, operate as one in their actions. Thus, whatever one of the Trinity does must be understood as being done by the other two as well. There is never an action of one of the Trinity that is independent of the other two. While the personal distinctions among the three are maintained, any operation of the Trinity is one operation, and hence when one acts, the other two are identified with the one.
*
I always need to read your reply many times to understand what you are saying.

Putting it in layman's terms,

there is always a distinction between the 3 persons, Father, Son and Spirit by plain revelation of the text.

At the same time the 3 persons are in unity, do not operate independent of each other.

Just take it as it is plainly revealed.

To make the Father = Son = Holy Spirit is blatant misrepresentation and being unfaithful to scriptures.
thomasthai
post Aug 21 2018, 08:31 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
321 posts

Joined: Apr 2012
QUOTE(Haledoch @ Aug 21 2018, 07:30 AM)
I know, I just point out the inconsistency of the trinity doctrine. How do know what they think in their own personal mind of who Jesus is? Do you think they believe Jesus is 3 persons like you?

Jehovah is God the Father. Jesus is God the Father. Jesus is Jehovah. How simple is that? Yet, you keep on believing in the trinity which is way too complex and even you get yourself confused with it.
*
Tell me, where did Jesus say He is the Father?
thomasthai
post Aug 28 2018, 09:04 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
321 posts

Joined: Apr 2012
QUOTE(Haledoch @ Aug 27 2018, 08:41 AM)
A pleasure to answer this. With pride, I will boast in the Lord of the blessed Truth that God gives me,

John 10:30
I and My Father are one.
This may be interpreted as one in unity.

Cross reference:
QUOTE
The glory which You have given Me I have given to them, that they may be one, just as We are one;  I in them and You in Me, that they may be perfected in unity, so that the world may know that You sent Me, and loved them, even as You have loved Me.
John 17:22‭-‬23 NASB
https://bible.com/bible/100/jhn.17.22-23.NASB

In the portion, Jesus is praying for the unity of all the disciples just as the unity of Himself with the Father.

So when Jesus says he is one with the Father, it is meant as in unity, not one in person.

QUOTE
John 14:9
Jesus said to him, “Have I been with you so long, and yet you have not known Me, Philip? He who has seen Me has seen the Father; so how can you say, ‘Show us the Father’?

Jesus is the exact representation of the Father, so the disciples see the Father and his nature in Jesus.

Cross reference:
QUOTE
God, after He spoke long ago to the fathers in the prophets in many portions and in many ways, in these last days has spoken to us in His Son, whom He appointed heir of all things, through whom also He made the world. And He is the radiance of His glory and the exact representation of His nature, and upholds all things by the word of His power. When He had made purification of sins, He sat down at the right hand of the Majesty on high,
Hebrews 1:1‭-‬3 NASB
https://bible.com/bible/100/heb.1.1-3.NASB

God spoke to us in the last days through His Son Jesus, who is the exact representation of Him, shares all His glory and power and might.

Hebrews still makes a distinction even though it says he is the exact representation of God.

QUOTE
John 8:58
Jesus said to them, “Most assuredly, I say to you, before Abraham was, I AM.”

This is Jesus claim to deity. He's saying he wasnt created at any point in time. He was eternally co-existent with God.

Cross reference
QUOTE
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. He was in the beginning with God.
John 1:1‭-‬2 NASB
https://bible.com/bible/100/jhn.1.1-2.NASB


He was eternally co-existent with the Father. He in NOT the Father.

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


The old and new testament is very explicit that there is God the Father, God the Son and God the Spirit, it teaches us the make the distinction.

For example Psalm 110;
QUOTE
The Lord says to my Lord: "Sit at My right hand Until I make Your enemies a footstool for Your feet."
Psalms 110:1 NASB
https://bible.com/bible/100/psa.110.1.NASB


Here is the most quoted text in the new testament of the messiah.

David says, the Lord says to my Lord, which we know as God talking to Jesus that he will ultimately give him all inheritence.

Old testament explicitly tells us there are two Lords here.

In fact, in the new testament, we learn the Spirit has the role of illumination, conviction, inspiring the recording of scriptures etc. Jesus always refers to the Spirit as 'He'.

You have two options here.

1) To say that all the text we are reading is not what it means.
When Jesus says the Father, he actually means himself. When Jesus refers to the Spirit, he also mean himself.
Or
2) To acknowledge that the the text says what it means. Our God is one in essence, and three in persons.

I think we are going in circles here. Conclusion, If there is one verse that says Jesus is the Father, the doctrine of trinity falls. But 2000 years of studying the scriptures prove there is no such verse.

thomasthai
post Aug 28 2018, 09:08 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
321 posts

Joined: Apr 2012
QUOTE(Haledoch @ Aug 28 2018, 08:47 AM)
The Plan of Salvation

John 1:1 (KJV)
In the beginning was the Word,

Before the creation of time, space, and matter, there was already a PLAN.

..and the Word was with God,
God had a plan, this plan belongs to God; the plan is God's plan.

..and the Word was God.
The plan was God to be the main actor of it, the sole player, the star of the plan. God made a plan for Himself. God WAS the PLAN.

John 1:2 (KJV)
The same was in the beginning with God.

God envisaged Himself in the plan as Jesus Christ from eternity.

John 1:3 (KJV)
All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that was made.

The creation of everything: the earth, the galaxies, the heavens, the creatures, etc, were done as part of His plan, to contribute to the realization of the main purpose of the plan - Salvation through God.

John 1:14 (KJV)
And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us...

The plan was for God to become flesh, and to live, and be raised among human.
*
A classic case of eisegesis. (reading yourself into the the text)

Stop putting your own theology into the text.
thomasthai
post Aug 28 2018, 09:53 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
321 posts

Joined: Apr 2012
QUOTE(Haledoch @ Aug 28 2018, 09:46 AM)
Contemptuous to the truth? Understandable. That was why Jesus spoke in parables, in order for some to remain blind.
*
Likewise rolleyes.gif
thomasthai
post Aug 28 2018, 09:56 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
321 posts

Joined: Apr 2012
QUOTE(Haledoch @ Aug 28 2018, 09:53 AM)
Assumed as unity, and falsely interpreted as unity. God is only one. Not 3 gods.
Two Lords? oh my. I am speechless.

Here is the Shema for you to meditate on,

Deuteronomy 6:4
Hear, O Israel: The Lord our God, the Lord is one!

*
The way you put your own theology into scriptures, i suggest you take a course in exegesis or hermeneutics

This post has been edited by thomasthai: Aug 28 2018, 09:56 AM
thomasthai
post Aug 28 2018, 10:02 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
321 posts

Joined: Apr 2012
QUOTE(Haledoch @ Aug 28 2018, 09:57 AM)
God is my teacher. I reject anyone to Lord over me except God.
*
Every heretic or cult in history thought that they had a new revelation from God too.
thomasthai
post Aug 28 2018, 10:08 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
321 posts

Joined: Apr 2012
QUOTE(Haledoch @ Aug 28 2018, 10:07 AM)
Fine by me if you or anyone want to call me heretic. I have no desire for my own glory.

Catholic or Calvinist are also false religions. Yet God let them flourish for now, because Satan is still the ruler of this world now.
*
Which church do you go to?
thomasthai
post Aug 28 2018, 10:20 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
321 posts

Joined: Apr 2012
QUOTE(Haledoch @ Aug 28 2018, 10:07 AM)
Fine by me if you or anyone want to call me heretic. I have no desire for my own glory.

Catholic and Calvinist are also false religions. Yet God let them flourish for now, because Satan is still the ruler of this world now.
*
Im not calling you a heretic buddy, but i disagree on people forming their own theology because they 'feel' that this is the meaning of a text.

In hermeneutics, the meaning of a text comes from the normal literal sense of the reading.

Or if the text is not clear, another portion of the text can be used to make it clearer, as scripture is the only interpreter of scripture.


This post has been edited by thomasthai: Aug 28 2018, 10:21 AM
thomasthai
post Aug 29 2018, 08:31 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
321 posts

Joined: Apr 2012
@Haledoch

You affirm that there's God the Father, God the Son, and God the Spirit too.

That's no different than the trinitarian confession.

The point of contention is this, the new testament did not say God the Father is God the Son or God the Spirit.

Scripture makes distinction, that is why we make a distinction.

Calvin wrote thay the trinity was defined in the early churches to counter heretical teachings, not only modalism, but teachings that denied the deity of Christ(arianism), docetism (Christ was a phantom ghost), and plenty more.

They needed a precise confession that was true to the teaching of the bible, thus the doctrine of trinity.

I find that it is still the most precise confession, any other formula will be contradictory, incoherent, or illogical.

I dont see a point in fighting if you cant see this. I wish you well.
thomasthai
post Aug 29 2018, 08:53 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
321 posts

Joined: Apr 2012
QUOTE(unknown warrior @ Aug 29 2018, 08:35 AM)
I find it weird...If haledoch acknowledge Jesus, Father God and Holy spirit...then that's the Trinity...He just doesn't understand that God has this ability to be Triune and yet Distinct at the same time.

only God has that kind of ability. I think I've said this before, when we try to force fit the trinity to human understanding, there will be rejecting because it doesn't make logical sense.
*
The confession that God is 1 in essence, 3 in persons might not make the fullest sense now, but it is not contradictory.

For example, if we say is God is one in A, but 3 in B, that is not contradictory and being faithful to the text of scriptures.

QUOTE
, it is not a contradiction for God to be both three and one because he is not three and one in the same way. He is three in a different way than he is one. Thus, we are not speaking with a forked tongue — we are not saying that God is one and then denying that he is one by saying that he is three. This is very important: God is one and three at the same time, but not in the same way.
https://www.desiringgod.org/articles/what-i...-of-the-trinity


But how it works behind the curtains, we can only know when we are all glorified. Trying to understand this now is futile.
thomasthai
post Sep 12 2018, 11:33 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
321 posts

Joined: Apr 2012
QUOTE(MsiaqweR @ Sep 12 2018, 10:42 AM)
Well, if God is real, why doesn't He just reveal himself? Just reveal himself for 3 secs is more than enough to silence all critics once and for all....
*
Hi,

You reckon 3 sec will do it for you?

Someone else will come along and say they want 1 minute, and others want an hour then a day, etc.

So what is the perfect time frame that will satisfy everyone?
thomasthai
post Oct 8 2018, 10:14 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
321 posts

Joined: Apr 2012
QUOTE(WyjSwmW @ Oct 6 2018, 10:23 AM)
Forwarded from my friend to me in WhatsApp and I would like to share here.

...

These are just a few I shared, there are tons and tons of other contradictions found which I lazy to share here.
*
So what is your motive of sharing these verses here? Are you looking for answers or do you take pleasure in ridiculing christians?

Anyway you don't have the context of the text in question, so how do you know they are contradictory?

A text without a context is a pretext.
thomasthai
post Oct 18 2018, 06:04 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
321 posts

Joined: Apr 2012
Delete

This post has been edited by thomasthai: Oct 18 2018, 06:56 PM
thomasthai
post Oct 22 2018, 05:43 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
321 posts

Joined: Apr 2012
The key to the verse is really Jesus saying 'I never knew you'.

Bible language, 'knowing' is always associated with having a intimate relationship with someone, like Adam knew his wife and conceived, etc.etc.

Whatever those people claimed, the text does not say whether they could really do it or not. Everything else is speculation.

Cochrane7, be careful of bill johnson, he is probably one that claimed he could do miracles and healings like those in the text.
thomasthai
post Oct 22 2018, 07:44 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
321 posts

Joined: Apr 2012
QUOTE(Mr. WongSF @ Oct 22 2018, 07:29 PM)
Dear mr Calvinist Cessationist,

a Continuationist will disagree with you. In fact, i sincerely believe that the gifts will still be fully operational during the tribulation period.

Regards
*
Really? Of all the people, i'd never expected you to buy into the charismatic delusions.

Im not even talking about their sensual/antinomian/ watered down/prosperity/self preaching.

Just google bill johnson and grave sucking. The whole church is engaged is christian mysticism. Also involved in tarrot/destiny card reading.

I'm very close to calling this mob a cult.

They also have a school that apparently teaches people to perform signs and miracles. Where is the bible mandate in that?

This post has been edited by thomasthai: Oct 22 2018, 07:45 PM
thomasthai
post Oct 23 2018, 03:55 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
321 posts

Joined: Apr 2012
QUOTE(Mr. WongSF @ Oct 23 2018, 01:13 AM)
Wokeh, i stand corrected. This guy is bad. Harry Potter bad.

Peace bro  icon_rolleyes.gif
edited :  I just saw you say charismatic, so i wanted to share a little. I attended a charismatic church for decades.  There were people speaking in 'tongues'. I couldn't understand what they were saying. Some were loud.

            I also witnessed what they call 'Holy Laughter'. Folks would laugh & fall on the floor. Then the ushers would cover them with pieces of cloth to preserve their modesty. They would cont laughing for quite a while.

            This next thing, i only heard about, but unfortunately was never around to witness it....'Slain in the Spirit'. Some folks would fly a few rows back suddenly.

            But i do not see any of these things happening at my new church. None at all. & i've been attending since end 2010.
*
I know pentecostal theology very well, i go to a pentecostal church.

While there are many genuine christians there, i honestly think there are also plenty that are charlatans, charlatans that build their entire ministry on signs and wonders INSTEAD of the gospel and proper preaching of the word.

While i want to be graceful to my friends in this forum, but i cant help but wonder, can the 'gifts' stand biblical scrutiny?

People speak in tongues all the time, but in 1 corinthians 13-14 paul says, in the corporate worship, that there should be no more than 3 tongue speakers at a time, and if there is no one to interpret, NOBODY should speak in tongues.

Why does the giver of the gifts (Holy Spirit) contradict His own written word? I see people contradict the bible all the time.

In a world full of confusion and deception, the only safe place to go is the word of God. I know Im going to offend people in here, but nothing matters to me more than telling the truth.

7 Pages < 1 2 3 4 > » Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0829sec    0.43    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 7th December 2025 - 12:11 AM