Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
124 Pages « < 103 104 105 106 107 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

RTS Starcraft 2, New Units with Video and Explanation.

views
     
hizperion
post Mar 25 2009, 04:06 PM

Average Bitch
*****
Senior Member
913 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: The Dupes Heaven; Expire: Oct 2077



lol yea..where can easily change engine last minute..
Cheesenium
post Mar 25 2009, 04:06 PM

Vigilo Confido
*******
Senior Member
4,852 posts

Joined: Aug 2006
QUOTE(tango25 @ Mar 25 2009, 04:03 PM)
i still don't like the engine for the sc2...
looks something like RNA engine to me.. sad.gif
hope when they had finalize everything, they use diff version of engine.
*
Then,dont play.Im happy with the graphics now.

Even Diablo 3 is a bit cartoonish. doh.gif
tango25
post Mar 25 2009, 04:30 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
205 posts

Joined: Sep 2008


Diablo still long.. can't say anything about it yet.
But the SC most probably RNA, from the demo, can't really tell.. didn't know they got turn up the graphics to max or not while showing.. biggrin.gif
Cheesenium
post Mar 25 2009, 05:12 PM

Vigilo Confido
*******
Senior Member
4,852 posts

Joined: Aug 2006
QUOTE(tango25 @ Mar 25 2009, 04:30 PM)
Diablo still long.. can't say anything about it yet.
But the SC most probably RNA, from the demo, can't really tell.. didn't know they got turn up the graphics to max or not while showing.. biggrin.gif
*
It's a brand new engine in SC2.Whats that gonna do with RNA?

I doubt that Blizzard gonna use EA's ancient engine.
tango25
post Mar 25 2009, 05:25 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
205 posts

Joined: Sep 2008


well... besides of gameplay, i would really love to see some cool graphics improvements in this new era of game universe..
FarCry3r
post Mar 25 2009, 05:27 PM

Where did my ♥ go?
*******
Senior Member
6,543 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: Miri



QUOTE(tango25 @ Mar 25 2009, 05:25 PM)
well... besides of gameplay, i would really love to see some cool graphics improvements in this new era of game universe..
*
Great games doesn't sells on it's graphics alone, if graphics is uber cool, with fluid reallife-like animations also means nothing if gameplay sucks, didn't it? Look at... Far Cry 2...

This post has been edited by FarCry3r: Mar 25 2009, 05:28 PM
tango25
post Mar 25 2009, 05:29 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
205 posts

Joined: Sep 2008


QUOTE(Cheesenium @ Mar 25 2009, 05:12 PM)
It's a brand new engine in SC2.Whats that gonna do with RNA?

I doubt that Blizzard gonna use EA's ancient engine.
*
Dont wanna disappoint you man,
guess SC will be using more Ancient than then RNA..
SDK ...O.o Same goes with diablo 3..

This post has been edited by tango25: Mar 25 2009, 05:36 PM
FarCry3r
post Mar 25 2009, 05:40 PM

Where did my ♥ go?
*******
Senior Member
6,543 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: Miri



QUOTE(tango25 @ Mar 25 2009, 05:29 PM)
Dont wanna disappoint you man,
guess SC will be using more Ancient than then RNA..
Havok ...O.o Same goes with diablo 3..
*
Havok? Wasn't Havok only a physic engine??? blink.gif
Cheesenium
post Mar 25 2009, 05:44 PM

Vigilo Confido
*******
Senior Member
4,852 posts

Joined: Aug 2006
QUOTE(tango25 @ Mar 25 2009, 05:29 PM)
Dont wanna disappoint you man,
guess SC will be using more Ancient than then RNA..
SDK ...O.o Same goes with diablo 3..
*
SC is so old already.Not surprised that it's using an even older engine.
herojack41
post Mar 25 2009, 05:45 PM

Master Of Trouble Maker
*******
Senior Member
5,697 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: A Place Where God And Master Of TroubleMaker Exist



hurm...i saw alot of ppl saying that sc2 graphic?i saw da demo play at kl convention centre....da graphich was like drool.gif
tango25
post Mar 25 2009, 05:49 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
205 posts

Joined: Sep 2008


herojack.. How was it?? Tell me about it.!!!! Please!!!! lol

This post has been edited by tango25: Mar 25 2009, 05:57 PM
RtP|DEV
post Mar 25 2009, 06:14 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
266 posts

Joined: Oct 2005
From: Shah Alam


ROFLMAO .... who cares about graphic, i wouldn't mind if its 2D with higher res than SC:BW.
Im fine with current graphic, as long as this new SC2 provide good visual clarity like SC:BW.
Cheesenium
post Mar 25 2009, 06:42 PM

Vigilo Confido
*******
Senior Member
4,852 posts

Joined: Aug 2006
QUOTE(RtP|DEV @ Mar 25 2009, 06:14 PM)
ROFLMAO .... who cares about graphic, i wouldn't mind if its 2D with higher res than SC:BW.
Im fine with current graphic, as long as this new SC2 provide good visual clarity like SC:BW.
*
Same for me.

Visual clarity is important.

I think Protoss spell fx is messy wei.
tango25
post Mar 25 2009, 10:16 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
205 posts

Joined: Sep 2008


then you guys are real hardcore gamefreaks! lol tongue.gif

i just like graphics, i love to see effects, impressive stuff game provides.. not the dull everything Low Settings.. i cant play game like that.. lol

But i guess Blizzard won't give the high end graphics game, it's games are well known for the Impressive Cinematics, and does not need high spec pc to play the game.
kenixkenix
post Mar 25 2009, 11:43 PM

hai kawan kawan
****
Senior Member
571 posts

Joined: Mar 2007
hope my lappie can tahan sc2 =p
TheNameX
post Mar 25 2009, 11:58 PM

I'm Just Notty =P
*****
Senior Member
910 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia


QUOTE(tango25 @ Mar 25 2009, 10:16 PM)
then you guys are real hardcore gamefreaks! lol tongue.gif

i just like graphics, i love to see effects, impressive stuff game provides.. not the dull everything Low Settings.. i cant play game like that.. lol

But i guess Blizzard won't give the high end graphics game, it's games are well known for the Impressive Cinematics, and does not need high spec pc to play the game.
*
Then probably you shouldnt even play RTS at all. RTS cant sell just because of their eye candy graphic. You should play FPS like Crysis if candy graphic is what you sore after.

Blizzard has the reputation of having their game able to run smoothly on old machine, it's done nicely with their engine coding, which is to me, one step beyond than any other current RTS game developers.
NicJolin
post Mar 26 2009, 12:07 AM

Stop monitoring =)
******
Senior Member
1,053 posts

Joined: Mar 2006
From: Stop monitoring =)
A combination of both graphic and gameplay would be the best ...still there's aren't many out there can do that.

If I'd to choose either one, gameplay comes first. Like Crysis I only use it for benchmarking purpose, never even finish half of the game. Don't even bother to try Warhead at all
selenium
post Mar 26 2009, 12:30 AM

RipVanWinkle
******
Senior Member
1,032 posts

Joined: Nov 2005
From: kuala lumpur


i wont be surprised if diablo 3 comes out before sc2 because sc2 has a very very very big shoe to fill.

while diablo 3, although also awesome news is easier to develop than sc2

RtP|DEV
post Mar 26 2009, 01:43 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
266 posts

Joined: Oct 2005
From: Shah Alam


Beta Theory

http://sc2betablog.blogspot.com/

QUOTE
So we're all eagerly waiting together for that wonderful morning when we boot up and check www.blizzard.com or www.battle.net or www.starcraft2.com and see the top news article "Starcraft 2 beta will begin ". The question is, when will that wonderful day come? This post is a list of a couple key things that blizzard representatives have unveiled that have led me to believe that the Starcraft 2 beta will be announced on March 31st, 2009.

Why that specific date? It happens to be the 11 year anniversary of the release of Starcraft. Blizzard proved that they are aware of these significant historic dates when they announced Diablo III on the anniversary of Diablo II's release at the BWWI '08.

To reinforce this, in a recent article from www.starcraftwire.net we were given a list of Starcraft 2 details that Blizzard rep Xordiah released at a German gaming event. The article lists a number of facts that no one new much about like Dark Pylons and big SCVs and a week or two later Q&A Batch 49 revealed to use the Mule (Big SCV) and Dark Pylons. This gives us reason to believe that everything Xordiah said was true.

T
he signifcant detail she released was that Blizzard had set a beta date internally and were just waiting until the right time to unveil it to the public. If this is true then it's extremely encouraging to my theories. Blizzard would not set a date even internally that was really far away. Blizzard never gives us dates more then a week or two in advance, they probably don't set dates internally unless they are fairly certain of them. The further away the day is the less certain they would be since there would be more unforseen variables to account for.

T
his then comes full circle with my theory. If they set a specific date in advance the date must have some significance. Otherwise they would simply say, "When we feel it's ready then we'll announce the beta." They've chosen a specific date in advance because the date has some significance. Blizzcon is too far away for it to be the date because of what I explained in the previous paragraph. They wouldn't set a specific date that far in the future. The only significant date for Starcraft coming up before then that I can think of is March 31st, the 11th anniversary of Starcraft's release.

Some other clues to a beta announcement coming soon is the recent introduction of the new battle.net account system. This hints at blizzard gearing up for the introduction of battle.net 2.0 which will first be tested in the Starcraft 2 beta. Additionally, when you create and account on this site you have the option to opt-in for upcoming beta tests. So anyone who's interested in getting in on the beta action should sign-up an account and opt-in ASAP.

Additionally at the Blizzard support site there is an icon for Starcraft 2 that currently leads nowhere but it's clear that they are even preparing their websites for the start of the Starcraft 2 beta.

Finally, www.blizzcon.com/beta the URL that blizzard directed Blizzcon '08 goers to in order to sign up for the beta has begun accepting beta keys. At the moment, all you recieve in return for entering your key is a confirmation e-mail but it is definitely hinting towards the beta starting very soon.

So we'll just have to wait and see, I'm sure Blizzard's site will see a ton of traffic next Tuesday whether or not they make any announcement. Everyone expects something for the anniversary whether it's the beta or the second battle report.


SCLegacy.com has two countdown timers going for the 30th and April 1st

Blizzard theme park contest ends MARCH 30th.. give them 2-3 weeks maybe to go thru all the submissions and give out keys for beta?? If thats not it, why is the contest ending in March, while the winner will only be reveiled in august at blizzcon?

Historically Blizzard beta starts 2 weeks after Beta announcement. If they announced it on 31st, the beta will be released on the same day as Demigod. GG Demigod if it happens.

Still, even if they announced it on 31st, the next day they can say "April fool...... we will announce it when its ready"
tango25
post Mar 26 2009, 10:47 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
205 posts

Joined: Sep 2008


nah... i don't think the game is ready to release yet. smile.gif

124 Pages « < 103 104 105 106 107 > » Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0199sec    0.58    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 1st December 2025 - 07:05 AM