same here

anyone downloaded it and mind to share it?

I think blizzard try to make SC2 as similiar to SC as much as possible in terms of gameplay as well as the graphics . Din notice any outstanding graphic in the gameplay screenshot,only can see its changed from 2D to 3D~maybe the cinematic in game might look impressive ^^
With this way,more players can enjoy SC2 even with their not-so-advanced-computer and the 1st series player wouldnt stick to SC as there's no major change in game.Blizzard attract more players and earn more in this way

MSI GeForce Fx 5600 with 256mb DDR have the SM2.0 thing?

@_@ time to upgrade

LOLLMAooZZZ ROFL XD!!!
nice one , btw wer's the "balls" ?


EDIT:Alright , alright . Edited ^^

This post has been edited by NicJolin: May 25 2007, 10:31 PM

Oh my...they really have some great ideas when it comes to earning more money
Even if every single trilogy's campaign is going to last very long. Buying 3 separated games could cost up to RM400 or more? Since normal game prices ranges from RM120 to RM180?
O_O omgosh

Blizzard is going to lose a hell lots of fan if its charging for the battlenet for SC2

I would enjoy great campaigns. I'm sure the multiplayer comes with 3 races as well. The only thing that bothers me is the price for each individual trilogy. I don't hope to see RM159 for each trilogy because the sum for 3 of 'em would cost more than RM400 which is quite overpriced!
If it cost around or less than RM100 for each, then its quite reasonable. =/

EDIT : Shut up kawaii87. There wont be a pirate version if there's no ori in the first place. Zzz

This post has been edited by NicJolin: Oct 15 2008, 09:09 PM

Hmm maybe they shud come out with something like super advance settings that utilize some DX10

At least an estimated release date blizzard...Zzz

I prefer the left one but why does his eyes doesn't glow like the right one? And curvy blades sounds good. How abour curvy and longer blade? That's abit like katana

Any concrete source battlenet is going to pay to play?

Because ~
Some battle.net features to be monetized
but...
Rob Pardo talks on battle.net monetizing plan

So I don't think its going to be subscription based or pay to access , pay to play or whatever you call it

This post has been edited by NicJolin: Feb 1 2009, 11:51 AM

all these waiting really robs away my hypes about it

A combination of both graphic and gameplay would be the best ...still there's aren't many out there can do that.

If I'd to choose either one, gameplay comes first. Like Crysis I only use it for benchmarking purpose, never even finish half of the game. Don't even bother to try Warhead at all

looks small and confined
Only a route leading in and out of the base

Coz they still hoping for 'Defense of the Galaxy' in SC2