QUOTE(Evyn @ Aug 15 2008, 06:48 PM)
I am trying to decide between IMU twinning and Moscow Medical Academy(MMA) in Russia. I'm now very confused as some are throwing insults at Russian graduates and yet some are saying how MMA is the one of the best medical schools in the world. As for IMU, a few said that IMU is a crappy university and should not study medicine in IMU. On the other hand, some people seem to think that IMU twinning is the best choice one can ever make. Some help please?? 
if you are even considering imu as an option, i would presume you are fully aware of the financial implication of the 3 years in 1st world and able to afford it........in which case, there is really no debate, imu-pms is definitely better.....you will get a well recognised qualification, and if you plan right, be able to stay back and do postgraduate training, or even settle there.......
russia suffers from the bad reputation the recruitment agents inflict on it, by many dubious practices, and self inflicted by poor selection of candidates, and some dubious practices themselves.....and from the fact healthcare, and the way medicine is practiced, is quite different from the western world........
one thing quite different between imu, and most other ipta/ipts, is the amount of 'teaching' you receive....it's little, prompting many to criticise it for being 'crappy', ie little spoon feeding....you are guided and expected to study yourself.......that prepares students well generally......
finally, imu will require higher grades to get in, although it is still pretty easy compared to direct entry to the pms......but if you slack/or is borderline qualified, be prepared to be flunked out.....they WILL fail you if you don't make the cut, they need to satisfy standards set by the receiving pms.....
This post has been edited by limeuu: Aug 15 2008, 11:27 PM
Aug 15 2008, 11:24 PM

Quote
0.0191sec
0.65
7 queries
GZIP Disabled