u dun need dof preview unless you're doing macro. u rarely use it in portrait.
Nikon D40x VS Canon 400D, which is better?
|
|
 May 22 2007, 10:14 AM
|
 
Senior Member
2,502 posts Joined: Apr 2005 From: Kuching,Kuala Lumpur, Gifu,Japan  
|
|
Quote|
|
|
|
|
Jul 9 2007, 04:06 PM
|
Junior Member
304 posts Joined: Oct 2004
|
may i know what is the lowest price and greatest for Nikon D40x ?
|
|
|
Jul 9 2007, 04:23 PM
|
All Stars
21,256 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Pekopon
|
QUOTE(clemong_888 @ May 22 2007, 10:14 AM) u dun need dof preview unless you're doing macro. u rarely use it in portrait. hmm not much feel also the DOF preview |
|
|
Jul 9 2007, 04:39 PM
|
Senior Member
1,219 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
Guys, is it true that the 400D jpegs are overly "soft"?? That's what the Digital Camera Mag (the local one) has been saying. I've been taking in RAW and to me, it does seem that RAW pictures are much sharper than when taken in JPG.
Oh..seems to me that my 400D tend to overexpose while u guys have been saying the opposite.. I've tried taken pictures of white flowers and the details are usually all blown out.. strange thing is, my S70 seems to be able to retain the details. Sighhhh.. |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: |  0.0173sec
 1.17
 5 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 21st December 2025 - 08:24 PM |
All Rights Reserved © 2002- 2025 Vijandren Ramadass (~unite against racism~)
Powered by Invision Power Board © 2025 IPS, Inc.