QUOTE(silverwl @ Jan 16 2020, 10:27 PM)
unlike those day, modern suv may not equip wuth AWD system. They try to do a "raise up" sedan for practicality. Improve handling and nimble close to a sedan but more space for practicality. Ya, you could argue that suv handling definitely cant match with sedan but good enough for daily use.
dun follow the trend but your needs and heart if you want buy a car.
space wise cx30 is about the same as mazda 3. not really noticeable difference. i would say the sedan has the same practicality as cx30 coz both car with about same boot space. m3 sedan has deeper boot space while cx30 is taller.
Agree with you on most of the aspects, but I’m considering between the liftback vs the CX30 (crossover SUV), so boot space definitely a huge difference for me.
Kinda difficult for me to make a decision also, in fact sedan can also be a good option, but just because I have not driven a liftback before, so I thought it would be now or never for me.
Relating to the post below:
1. I’m a short dude stand at 170cm only.
2. In my early 30s, married but no kid, not sure when would have one, even if I have one, the liftback can also serve me for a while right. Assuming I can use this car for let’s say 7-8 or even 10 years, my kid/kids would also be a few years old, don’t think so it would be a big problem if I don’t own the so called SUV family car right.
QUOTE(voncrane @ Jan 16 2020, 10:45 PM)
*AWD if that's your thing.. Fewer sedans with AWD than SUVs. Both the M3 and CX30 are only front wheel drive right.
*Much easier entry and exit, especially for taller folks (193cm here) or the elderly.. Those legs aren't as strong as they used to be..
okay fair point, ingress and egress, but I stand only at 170cm, don’t find it difficult for both the available options, but suv would have an advantage here. Also, I would be mostly driving the car myself, at least Monday to Friday, would be me alone only.*Definitely more comfortable and spacious seats (but this is subjective la.. Materials, etc.. plus most D segment sedan cars are wider and comfy too) for bigger folks...Also, more head and leg room.
I find both the same, in fact the back passenger seat is a bit too straight upright to my liking (not sure if you guys notice this).*Superior outward visibility.. I can see over most cars on the road and drive accordingly.. Far less surprises then.
Yes, better visibility for SUV, but don’t think it is far superior over the sedans. *Pulling up to toll or parking entry/exit machines. At minimum, it's level or one has to reach down slightly vs reaching up and out of the seat.
Fair point, but can be too mynute, at least for me. I find driving a sedan is easier when I wear my long sleeve working shirt, I don’t need my hand to touch the bottom of the outside window which sometimes can carry some dust/dirt, when I drive cx5, I would dirty the sleeve of my shirt when I use the touchngo at the toll touchpoint. Maybe because I’m short. The touchpoint will be sort of at the mid air (so no contact between my hand and the bottom of the outside window.*I stand straight up and load the (often more spacious) boot.. No need to bend at an awkward angle to toss or bring out stuff deep within. Hard to quantify how great this is until you get used to it. Great point, especially when you age and have backache.
This is also another point for me to consider the CX30 as it comes with the powerboot, but my only concern is, I rarely use the boot, maybe not even once in a month or so.*Better ride quality on our bad roads.. Prior to this, have to worry about banging the car's bottom and feeling it all the way through my bones to my skull. Similarly with certain road bumps. Sedan fully loaded, you'll have to slow down to take it and high chance still scrape your bottom or bumper.. Typical SUV just rolls right ahead no fear..
Agree on this, I find that the mazda 3 ground clearance is like a little too low? Is it lower than a normal standard? Or is it still standard and all you have to do is slow down more at the speed bumps? Or just ram over with the CX30?As for heavier, higher fuel consumption, needs more effort fighting gravity at corners etc? Come to the dark side... With the diesel turbocharged engine.. Weight, FC & effort are a thing of the past..
comment not so applicable as I’m looking at the 2.0 petrol engine.Okay.. I'm done plugging SUVs and particularly the CX-5... Haha..Just my 2 sen lah.. I'm sure others like you who love sedans more have your reasons..Grab what makes you happy. Cuz, it's going to depreciate each year anyways.
See above... Ultimately, depends on what you want and will enjoy.. I switched from sedan to SUV and loving it. Doesn't mean I won't still own another sedan? Far from it.. Still have my eyes on the bimmer 5 series. Heck, the Myvi or Jazz type cars still make good safe choices for short town runs.
QUOTE(D-Frog @ Jan 16 2020, 11:15 PM)
Tried all 3 of them, even most of the specs.
1.5 M3 Sedan/Liftback - Pretty Great, just don't like the fabric seats and that cheap non-chrome stuff all over. Don't like how there's so many blind spot.
2.0 M3 Sedan High Plus - Sufficient Power, but power isn't really my concern. Love the leather interior and design, felt just like my 330e.
CX-30 - Best view and driving experience wise abit lesser handling compare to m3 overall but the brown interior I don't dig.
So ended up with 2.0 High because I don't need the MRCC feature.
Thanks for your sharing, I share the same views as yours on the CX30. I find double tone colour scheme nicer, but maybe not with this brown that they use in the interior, maybe burgundy would be better, like those they use for the other markets.
But do you mind elaborating the blind spot? I tried and tested the car, it drives like normal (I mean surrounding observation), so I don’t quite get what others meant by that. Yes, agree that the rear windscreen is a bit small compared to the other cars, so they sacrifice some small visibility for a more stylish look.
So in the end, booked the liftback, waiting for the car arrival in march. Hopefully I won’t regret in near future.