Personal when everyone shoot models......i shoot......, goldfries' gallery
|
|
 Apr 14 2007, 06:40 PM, updated 18y ago
Show posts by this member only | Post
#1
|
 
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003    
|
---------------------------------------
my gallery thread missing already, so here's a new one. armed with my lousy skills, a 350D and my kit lens and Tamron 70-300mm lens, today i went for this adventure. damn, first time doing fashion show photo-shoot.  criticisms / comments / praises are more than welcomed, please help me improve my shots!!!          This post has been edited by goldfries: Jul 19 2008, 01:58 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 14 2007, 06:52 PM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#2
|
 
Senior Member
1,206 posts Joined: Sep 2006
|
great shots man
nothing lousy men also got? This post has been edited by phas3r: Apr 14 2007, 06:53 PM |
|
|
Apr 14 2007, 06:54 PM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#3
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
thanks!!
yes, there's men.  and i believe there'll be kids too.  more details here http://forum.lowyat.net/topic/434135 i've attached the time-table. of course, you won't expect to see men on Women's Secret show la but then there's plenty of other shows for men. |
|
|
Apr 14 2007, 07:00 PM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#4
|
Junior Member
79 posts Joined: Dec 2006 From: ┌∩┐(◕_◕)┌∩┐ 
|
why most photos upper side...boobs..
 well nice pix  |
|
|
Apr 14 2007, 07:05 PM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#5
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
QUOTE(tarecore @ Apr 14 2007, 07:00 PM) why most photos upper side...boobs.. erm yeah. people ask me also where's my full-body shots. well nice pix  i find the angle not nice la either that or i just sux at it (which most likely is the reason). other reason is personal preference of disliking the crowd and the setting, of course arguable i could crop those out. i'm still trying to grasp fashion shoot, going again next week. hopefully can do better. this time i'll arm myself with larger capacity CF card as well. tomorrow, see how la if i can make it. EDITED : typo. This post has been edited by goldfries: Apr 15 2007, 01:25 AM |
|
|
Apr 14 2007, 07:07 PM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#6
|
All Stars
17,875 posts Joined: Jan 2005
|
Nice shot goldfries
|
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 14 2007, 07:56 PM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#7
|
Junior Member
487 posts Joined: May 2005 From: KL
|
NICE!
like the others say y mostly close up fashion show need to take some shot of the clothes also |
|
|
Apr 14 2007, 08:22 PM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#8
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
hehe. explained already mah at Post #5
|
|
|
Apr 14 2007, 08:32 PM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#9
|
All Stars
21,256 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Pekopon
|
a bit warm ..
|
|
|
Apr 14 2007, 08:35 PM
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
QUOTE(shinchan^^ @ Apr 14 2007, 08:32 PM) a bit warm .. more details please sifu.EDITED : not quite sure what you mean but i hope i didn't get it wrong. i didn't use flash, lights were based on the lightings from the stage / runway setup. the lights on them were not white colored. This post has been edited by goldfries: Apr 14 2007, 08:36 PM |
|
|
Apr 14 2007, 08:39 PM
|
|
All Stars
21,256 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Pekopon
|
should try tunsten WB
|
|
|
Apr 14 2007, 08:41 PM
|
 
Staff
7,529 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
as usual 350D and 400D WB sure lari. Set your WB to tungsten then your pic colors will look natural.
and my god, my luv luv is there too  ahhh Lolita |
|
|
Apr 14 2007, 08:42 PM
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
QUOTE(shinchan^^ @ Apr 14 2007, 08:39 PM) should try tunsten WB alright!! noted. hopefully this will settle the issue for some car shows too, like KLIM where some showrooms are using dimmer lights. will try!! thank you. QUOTE(nairud @ Apr 14 2007, 08:41 PM) as usual 350D and 400D WB sure lari. Set your WB to tungsten then your pic colors will look natural. will run? oh didn't know that. thx for the tips. QUOTE(nairud @ Apr 14 2007, 08:41 PM) and my god, my luv luv is there too that's her? ouhhh....... ahhh LolitaThis post has been edited by goldfries: Apr 14 2007, 08:42 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 14 2007, 08:47 PM
|
|
All Stars
21,256 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Pekopon
|
the best is to get a camera that allow kelvin settings
eg. 30D, 1D  |
|
|
Apr 14 2007, 08:52 PM
|
|
Staff
7,529 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
All of them are from Andrews models..
Tungsten wb is for you to counter yellow tint |
|
|
Apr 14 2007, 08:53 PM
|
|
All Stars
21,256 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Pekopon
|
kelvin 2500 is all u needed
|
|
|
Apr 14 2007, 09:07 PM
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
poison poison poison......... you guys are good that that.
 i still have a shopping list to fulfill leh. |
|
|
Apr 14 2007, 09:13 PM
|
Junior Member
115 posts Joined: Dec 2005 From: Malaysia
|
Wah.. your shots all so nice.. I dare not post up mine already...
 Somemore so paiseh... After the Tangoo lineup my battery no more... Didnt manage to take pictures of Elle line up and the others later on... Somemore starting sit at the bench.. the stupid guard chase me away.. Then I have to take from upper floor. So far to shoot, shaky hands, lousy shots. hahaha This post has been edited by sojen: Apr 14 2007, 09:14 PM |
|
|
Apr 14 2007, 09:38 PM
|
Senior Member
2,205 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
I went to the bridal catwalk in old wing instead of this...
More chun babes... and boobs... LOL |
|
|
Apr 14 2007, 09:46 PM
|
|
Junior Member
115 posts Joined: Dec 2005 From: Malaysia
|
QUOTE(kapitan @ Apr 14 2007, 09:38 PM) I went to the bridal catwalk in old wing instead of this... Oh? What time was the catwalk? When I passby only saw all wedding booths do din bother to stay around..More chun babes... and boobs... LOL |
|
|
Apr 14 2007, 10:23 PM
|
Senior Member
2,347 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: in town
|
nice and sharp, but a lil bit over saturate to my like. tone down a lil bit will definately looks better, imho.
btw, how much is the tamron 70-300? coz i'm looking for a tele lense also |
|
|
Apr 15 2007, 12:10 AM
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
QUOTE(sojen @ Apr 14 2007, 09:13 PM) Wah.. your shots all so nice.. I dare not post up mine already... eh wait - how come you kena halau wan? we all at LG also can snap all over the place leh. Somemore so paiseh... After the Tangoo lineup my battery no more... Didnt manage to take pictures of Elle line up and the others later on... Somemore starting sit at the bench.. the stupid guard chase me away.. Then I have to take from upper floor. So far to shoot, shaky hands, lousy shots. hahaha QUOTE(kapitan @ Apr 14 2007, 09:38 PM) I went to the bridal catwalk in old wing instead of this... aiks. didn't know about this event. damn!!More chun babes... and boobs... LOL QUOTE(eddychstu @ Apr 14 2007, 10:23 PM) nice and sharp, but a lil bit over saturate to my like. tone down a lil bit will definately looks better, imho. this unit i bought at RM 600 la. btw, how much is the tamron 70-300? coz i'm looking for a tele lense also the other day i was at Amcorp, talked to J-One (correct name or not?) that shop and they were selling RM 590. of course the RM 590 doesn't come with filter la. |
|
|
Apr 15 2007, 12:43 AM
|
|
Junior Member
115 posts Joined: Dec 2005 From: Malaysia
|
QUOTE(goldfries @ Apr 15 2007, 12:10 AM) eh wait - how come you kena halau wan? we all at LG also can snap all over the place leh. I mean cannot sit at the side bench and snap... either must go podium or side of the podium.aiks. didn't know about this event. damn!! this unit i bought at RM 600 la. the other day i was at Amcorp, talked to J-One (correct name or not?) that shop and they were selling RM 590. of course the RM 590 doesn't come with filter la.so i go to G floor. Right above the podium, but my 3X optical zoom very sad... |
|
|
Apr 15 2007, 03:27 AM
|
Junior Member
96 posts Joined: Oct 2005
|
ooohhh.. very high depth of feel
|
|
|
Apr 15 2007, 09:22 AM
|
|
Senior Member
2,205 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
Dont know today still have bridal catwalk or not...
Bridal fair from 11-15 April... it was from 3:30 pm yesterday... I was on the 1st floor and having a 'nice' view... |
|
|
Apr 16 2007, 12:41 AM
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
yay fashion show coming!!!
This post has been edited by goldfries: Apr 21 2007, 12:41 AM |
|
|
Apr 21 2007, 12:41 AM
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
before i go for the Fashion show again, here's additional pictures from my earlier shoot.
        |
|
|
Apr 21 2007, 01:57 AM
|
|
Junior Member
295 posts Joined: Apr 2006
|
nice one over here... the compositions are tight and bright..
|
|
|
Apr 21 2007, 04:30 AM
|
Senior Member
3,758 posts Joined: Apr 2006 From: Selayang
|
Goldfries,
Good shots but still need to tune up a lil' bit : 1. White Balance - Running lights and yellow spots are never an excuse, practice makes perfect. Get to know your camera. 2. Positioning - Try to get a spot as close as the center as you possibly can. Models down the runway a best shown walking straight towards you. 3. Handholding - All your shots are blur to begin with and sharpened by post processing, hold your camera steady. |
|
|
Apr 21 2007, 05:11 PM
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
thank you very much!!! first outing with my DSLR leh.
white-balance issue, yes i've worked on it already based on the advice from shinchan / nairud earlier. i donno why that day for some strange reason i forgot about white-balance setting. today also first round i forgot, later only remember. gila wan after go DSLR + fashion show = all forgot.  as positioning, it was crowded so i tried other angles instead. today i've worked on that one already too, so better runway pics. and hand-holding issue, the ones on 2nd page were the more blur ones. i just put it up with sharpening, they weren't the best of the pick for that day. many of the shots were blur that day due to various issues. and yes, worked on it already. i'll upload my new pics later tonight.  anyway your feedback is much appreciated. later you come feedback on my newest pictures la.  sifu feedbacks are important.This post has been edited by goldfries: Apr 21 2007, 05:19 PM |
|
|
Apr 22 2007, 12:06 AM
|
Junior Member
405 posts Joined: Jan 2005
|
QUOTE(goldfries @ Apr 21 2007, 12:41 AM) before i go for the Fashion show again, here's additional pictures from my earlier shoot. nooob feedbacks such as myself brian? u accept kA? i love your shots, i can't tell wehther u did post processing (like ac98 said) but i like it coz it's clear. however, this model, with the stripped black white shirt... i feel it needed some headroom. chopped off the head of hers. but oh does the strips stand out yum... also i do agree, i find it a bit too warm. too much orange in the skin tone. unatural, so to speak. but strangely, everytime i take shots, i'd do what u do, compensate the WB so that it shows more orange. looking at the little LCD screen on my d70s, i find it too dull, if it's not warm. looking at the pics from ac98, henrylow, shinchan and others, i find their shots not so warm, but it brings out the beauty in the skin tone (yet to learn that )Added on April 22, 2007, 12:06 ambtw, how to know a pic is too orange, i guess u could look at the white stripes on that model's shirt. it supposed to be WHITE, instead it looks orange. This post has been edited by miraged: Apr 22 2007, 12:06 AM |
|
|
Apr 22 2007, 12:10 AM
|
Junior Member
115 posts Joined: Nov 2006 
|
http://www.goldfries.com/images/gallery/al...070414fo105.jpg
i can't help but notices her, she's so hot |
|
|
Apr 22 2007, 12:12 AM
|
|
Junior Member
405 posts Joined: Jan 2005
|
heheh i like that black and white stripped shirt girl better
|
|
|
Apr 22 2007, 12:12 AM
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
thx. personally i didn't like head chop off as well.
the additional fashion shots (from 14th April) on this page were just some extras i'd like to show case. not exactly my favs. it's yellowish-tinge can be seen on the entire picture actually. no need white shirt - cos really, how do you even know the shirt has white stripes? right?post processing were done, if it enhances the shot i see no wrong of doing it. it was a white-balance setting error for me.being n00bie in fashion photography, i wasn't expecting my shots to get praises in the first place. it was challenging for me as i was without flash, using zooms (a lot) and the a lot lighting variations. the point of show-casing my fashion shoot is to gain precious feedbacks to improve my shots. thank all of you. btw i'm also n00b dude, so relax. we're all here to learn. anyway stay tuned, i'm in the midst of preparing my latest photoshoot. EDITED : i've not went through all my pics today but so far i'm a bit disappointed. feels over-exposed. well back to the drawing board!!! This post has been edited by goldfries: Apr 22 2007, 12:21 AM |
|
|
Apr 22 2007, 01:24 AM
|
Senior Member
777 posts Joined: Feb 2006 From: 東京都大森大田区
|
QUOTE(nairud @ Apr 14 2007, 08:41 PM) as usual 350D and 400D WB sure lari. Set your WB to tungsten then your pic colors will look natural. wow~ her name is Lolita ? any more info about her ? very attractive ler !! and my god, my luv luv is there too ahhh Lolitaby the way!! nice moment captured by ur 350D !! this is ur 1st time shot fashion walk ? |
|
|
Apr 22 2007, 03:00 AM
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
QUOTE(kevinyong84 @ Apr 22 2007, 01:24 AM) wow~ her name is Lolita ? any more info about her ? very attractive ler !! yes kevin, it's my first time to shoot fashion walk.by the way!! nice moment captured by ur 350D !! this is ur 1st time shot fashion walk ? took the challenge the moment i found out about the event. had some failed shots today (ok, more like yesterday) and i'm disappointed. more details in spoiler. » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « |
|
|
Apr 22 2007, 03:02 AM
|
|
Senior Member
3,758 posts Joined: Apr 2006 From: Selayang
|
What exactly are the setting you did?
|
|
|
Apr 22 2007, 03:05 AM
|
Senior Member
3,657 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: My Room
|
you're at One U today ? there's women's secret's fashion show wor..
|
|
|
Apr 22 2007, 03:08 AM
|
|
Senior Member
3,758 posts Joined: Apr 2006 From: Selayang
|
You asking me? Nope. I grew tired of fashion shows already, been shooting them since 2002, from film to digital, sien jor. You all go shoot and practice-lah.
|
|
|
Apr 22 2007, 03:11 AM
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
ac98, it was (for me) a shutter speed issue but later on manage to more or less solve the problem.
i'm using 350D, Tamron 70-300mm tele lens, no flash and my intention was not just to capture the models and their apparels but also to attempt to capture the background. this week lighting different. bumped up to 1/200. still i find it over-exposed. then in the end at 1/320. much better. i tried even faster shutter speed then the model will look less bright but background become dim. well, at least that's what i saw as i test around. i did the best to my ability. i'm too tired to upload my photos now, later i upload already you guys comment on it la. i do hope you guys will find it to be an improvement. thank you very much. in need of expert guidance.QUOTE(exkay @ Apr 22 2007, 03:05 AM) you're at One U today ? there's women's secret's fashion show wor.. yeah. don't expect lingerie. haha. well got a bit la. i just finished picking my pictures. so far only from Women'Secret la. the rest not yet. damn tired.QUOTE(ac98 @ Apr 22 2007, 03:08 AM) You asking me? Nope. I grew tired of fashion shows already, been shooting them since 2002, from film to digital, sien jor. You all go shoot and practice-lah. all the more why people like us need your words of wisdom.This post has been edited by goldfries: Apr 22 2007, 03:12 AM |
|
|
Apr 22 2007, 03:19 AM
|
|
Junior Member
295 posts Joined: Apr 2006
|
the faster shutter speed u use, the more likely it will be underexposed...
|
|
|
Apr 22 2007, 03:23 AM
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
QUOTE(diwant @ Apr 22 2007, 03:19 AM) the faster shutter speed u use, the more likely it will be underexposed... yeah i knew that, i was attempting to get a decent balance of exposure of foreground / subject and background. |
|
|
Apr 22 2007, 03:24 AM
|
Junior Member
144 posts Joined: Apr 2005 From: Wangsa Maju x Labuan
|
QUOTE(exkay @ Apr 22 2007, 03:05 AM) you're at One U today ? there's women's secret's fashion show wor.. Walao eee... That time really sien... The most many people round...  QUOTE(goldfries @ Apr 22 2007, 03:11 AM) ac98, it was (for me) a shutter speed issue but later on manage to more or less solve the problem. Walao... I oso blur blur liao... i'm using 350D, Tamron 70-300mm tele lens, no flash and my intention was not just to capture the models and their apparels but also to attempt to capture the background. this week lighting different. bumped up to 1/200. still i find it over-exposed. then in the end at 1/320. much better. i tried even faster shutter speed then the model will look less bright but background become dim. well, at least that's what i saw as i test around. i did the best to my ability. i'm too tired to upload my photos now, later i upload already you guys comment on it la. i do hope you guys will find it to be an improvement. thank you very much. in need of expert guidance.yeah. don't expect lingerie. haha. well got a bit la. i just finished picking my pictures. so far only from Women'Secret la. the rest not yet. damn tired. all the more why people like us need your words of wisdom. But the yellow spot lights really geng...  |
|
|
Apr 22 2007, 09:27 AM
|
|
Senior Member
3,758 posts Joined: Apr 2006 From: Selayang
|
I have a model shoot this morning, if got time I might drop by 1 Utama for a look-see after lunch
|
|
|
Apr 22 2007, 11:25 PM
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
OK. HERE'S THE MOMENT YOU GUYS HAVE BEEN WAITING FOR!! (i hope la. haha)
da DSLR n00b is back. went out on my 3rd date with my DSLR. (and yes, 2nd time on fashion shooting. 1st time shooting from near center) so yeah, 'nuff sed and ON WITH THE SHOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!           This post has been edited by goldfries: Apr 22 2007, 11:28 PM |
|
|
Apr 22 2007, 11:28 PM
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
          |
|
|
Apr 22 2007, 11:29 PM
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
          |
|
|
Apr 22 2007, 11:30 PM
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
          |
|
|
Apr 22 2007, 11:31 PM
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
     OK - END OF GALLERY FOR FASHION ON 1!!! now awaiting comments / feedbacks / bashings. EDITED : Dear SIFUS! i hope that these new shots have shown improvements. This post has been edited by goldfries: Apr 22 2007, 11:36 PM |
|
|
Apr 22 2007, 11:39 PM
|
|
Junior Member
144 posts Joined: Apr 2005 From: Wangsa Maju x Labuan
|
Wah... overall very nice... Only some are over expose...
 Wat settings U use? Mind to share? Wah Kao... Zoom Lens kuat... |
|
|
Apr 22 2007, 11:41 PM
|
|
Junior Member
241 posts Joined: Nov 2005 From: Damansara Jaya
|
very nice.. compared to your first try, this one is so much brighter
|
|
|
Apr 22 2007, 11:46 PM
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
that also over-exposed ah?
well yeah it is, over-exposed here and there but not as bad as those that i didn't upload.  it was a much more challenging outing than the previous.  1st the runway lights - i didn't have to care about this one earlier. 2nd - sunlight so it was tricky for me, i wanted to capture the face, the apparel and the background too.  my settings were simple, ISO800, aperture f4, shutter 1/320. M mode leh. EDITED : oh yeah. and NO FLASH. while colored clothings and angles that reflect light to me tend to be exposed. i only had limited time that day (5 sessions) and i had some really lousy failures as well but overall i learned quite some new things. as you can see the background and face were quite nicely capture (i think) and it's just some exposure thing that i need to work on.  This post has been edited by goldfries: Apr 22 2007, 11:47 PM |
|
|
Apr 22 2007, 11:58 PM
|
|
Junior Member
241 posts Joined: Nov 2005 From: Damansara Jaya
|
goldfries, i realize one problem when shooting.. its that your setting is not suitable to be used with flash, or it'll be over exposed.. but there are so many flashing flashing from others.. sometimes the flash same time as you shoot, therefore.. over exposure.
|
|
|
Apr 23 2007, 12:05 AM
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
QUOTE(maRx @ Apr 22 2007, 11:58 PM) goldfries, i realize one problem when shooting.. its that your setting is not suitable to be used with flash, or it'll be over exposed.. but there are so many flashing flashing from others.. sometimes the flash same time as you shoot, therefore.. over exposure. i do have shots that hit same time with flash and i can assure you that my over-exposure was not due to flash from other people. my setting was such that even the lightings at the runway is enough to cause over-exposure. |
|
|
Apr 23 2007, 12:05 AM
|
|
Junior Member
144 posts Joined: Apr 2005 From: Wangsa Maju x Labuan
|
QUOTE(maRx @ Apr 22 2007, 11:58 PM) goldfries, i realize one problem when shooting.. its that your setting is not suitable to be used with flash, or it'll be over exposed.. but there are so many flashing flashing from others.. sometimes the flash same time as you shoot, therefore.. over exposure. EDITED : oh yeah. and NO FLASH.No flash 1 leh... Walao M mode... Yeah your model is there, background is there... I go shot today... But I think the results is bad too... I saw ac98... I got use M mode too... But I can't handle it well...  So changed back to A...  But when I was using M Mode... I shot "Dai Fu"... I think everyone shot that cause the dress is shorter than the "Dai Fu" |
|
|
Apr 23 2007, 12:08 AM
|
|
Junior Member
241 posts Joined: Nov 2005 From: Damansara Jaya
|
QUOTE(lvyk @ Apr 23 2007, 12:05 AM) EDITED : oh yeah. and NO FLASH. haha.. ya lor, the dai fu.. during the t.h jewelry one. i saw one guy's camera LCD infront of me, he zoom in the dai fu and shoot only.. no face, no leg. No flash 1 leh... Walao M mode... Yeah your model is there, background is there... I go shot today... But I think the results is bad too... I saw ac98... I got use M mode too... But I can't handle it well... So changed back to A... But when I was using M Mode... I shot "Dai Fu"... I think everyone shot that cause the dress is shorter than the "Dai Fu" Added on April 23, 2007, 12:10 am QUOTE(goldfries @ Apr 23 2007, 12:05 AM) i do have shots that hit same time with flash and i can assure you that my over-exposure was not due to flash from other people. weird.. but why some shots ok, but some shots overexposed one?my setting was such that even the lightings at the runway is enough to cause over-exposure. This post has been edited by maRx: Apr 23 2007, 12:10 AM |
|
|
Apr 23 2007, 12:15 AM
|
|
Staff
7,529 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
show me dai fu
|
|
|
Apr 23 2007, 12:17 AM
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
QUOTE(maRx @ Apr 23 2007, 12:08 AM) weird.. but why some shots ok, but some shots overexposed one? 1. white-clothings 2. body angles that reflect lights 3. amount of zoom (i suppose) notice that on other angles, distance and non-white clothings they shots look better. QUOTE(nairud @ Apr 23 2007, 12:15 AM) show me dai fu me no dai fu shots la. |
|
|
Apr 23 2007, 12:32 AM
|
|
Junior Member
295 posts Joined: Apr 2006
|
I would say it is a very big step of improvement already.. yous shots are more vibrant and compositions are tight. The selection of subjects and the background blends very well here. And although some of the pictures were a little bit high-key, I don't see anything wrong with your series today..
EDIT: These models are damn & f*****g HOT!!   This post has been edited by diwant: Apr 23 2007, 01:06 AM |
|
|
Apr 23 2007, 12:38 AM
|
Junior Member
470 posts Joined: Aug 2006
|
Nice series there
I wish I was there as well, too bad I had to study  |
|
|
Apr 23 2007, 12:57 AM
|
|
Senior Member
777 posts Joined: Feb 2006 From: 東京都大森大田区
|
wow very shoyk la !! can view so many photo !!!! |
|
|
Apr 23 2007, 09:01 AM
|
|
All Stars
21,256 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Pekopon
|
QUOTE(goldfries @ Apr 22 2007, 11:46 PM) that also over-exposed ah? Should lower your ISO a little well yeah it is, over-exposed here and there but not as bad as those that i didn't upload. my settings were simple, ISO800, aperture f4, shutter 1/320. M mode leh. EDITED : oh yeah. and NO FLASH. |
|
|
Apr 23 2007, 12:30 PM
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
yeah. ISO settings too.
i used ISO 800 last week, so this week also used ISO 800. didn't try ISO 400 though so i don't know if it'll be better. the thing was that last week i used f5.6 and this week i used f4 and i didn't expect the results to be THAT drastic. as usual, on LCD it looks fine. but yeah, getting to know the camera better now. it's a learning process. all in all i'm glad to see improvements in the shots. This post has been edited by goldfries: Apr 23 2007, 01:42 PM |
|
|
Apr 27 2007, 05:59 PM
|
Junior Member
35 posts Joined: Sep 2006
|
do you use AWB or tungsten?
|
|
|
Apr 27 2007, 10:34 PM
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
ok - shots without yellowish tinge = Tungsten WB.
|
|
|
Apr 28 2007, 02:04 AM
|
|
Senior Member
3,758 posts Joined: Apr 2006 From: Selayang
|
QUOTE(lvyk @ Apr 23 2007, 12:05 AM) I saw ac98... Just read this only ... wahlan ehh dun say you saw me and use the love emoticon-lah, later ppl think we are lovers I got use M mode too... But I can't handle it well... So changed back to A... But when I was using M Mode... I shot "Dai Fu"... I think everyone shot that cause the dress is shorter than the "Dai Fu" Oh yeah the 'taifu' incident ... when that happened I lower my camera, looked up and saw everyone was fcking GLUED to their viewfinders and shooting away, some stood by the side and shying off. See the difference between perverts and shy guys? |
|
|
Apr 28 2007, 02:32 AM
|
|
Senior Member
3,758 posts Joined: Apr 2006 From: Selayang
|
QUOTE(goldfries @ Apr 23 2007, 12:30 PM) yeah. ISO settings too. Let me tip you here ...i used ISO 800 last week, so this week also used ISO 800. didn't try ISO 400 though so i don't know if it'll be better. the thing was that last week i used f5.6 and this week i used f4 and i didn't expect the results to be THAT drastic. as usual, on LCD it looks fine. but yeah, getting to know the camera better now. it's a learning process. all in all i'm glad to see improvements in the shots. There are 3 Elements you need to remember for now - The ISO, the Aperture and the Shutter Speed : 1. The ISO setting basically controls how 'sensitive' the sensor/CCD : The higher the number, the stronger its sensitivity is to colour and light (consider it like it's your sex drive, haha!). 2. Shutter Speed, this one abit tricky : The faster the shutter plane closes the less light and colour have a chance to penetrate. By 'penetrate' I know you guys have lotsa ideas already, I will leave it at that for you to remember easier. 3. Aperture setting : Well, the bigger the opening the more light and colour can The ROT (Rule of Thumb) is : The more light hits the sensor/CCD the brighter the image becomes, if you have a overeposure that means somewhere along the the line you either have too low a shutter speed, too wide an opening or too sensitive an ISO. How you can juggle between this 3 elements would depend on how well you handle your camera, there are no fixed settings for any kind of enviroment. Hope that helps, happy shooting!:) This post has been edited by ac98: Apr 28 2007, 02:37 AM |
|
|
Apr 28 2007, 02:52 AM
|
|
Junior Member
295 posts Joined: Apr 2006
|
QUOTE(ac98 @ Apr 28 2007, 02:04 AM) Just read this only ... wahlan ehh dun say you saw me and use the love emoticon-lah, later ppl think we are lovers  *run for my life... |
|
|
Apr 28 2007, 03:34 AM
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
QUOTE(ac98 @ Apr 28 2007, 02:32 AM) The ROT (Rule of Thumb) is : The more light hits the sensor/CCD the brighter the image becomes, if you have a overeposure that means somewhere along the the line you either have too low a shutter speed, too wide an opening or too sensitive an ISO. How you can juggle between this 3 elements would depend on how well you handle your camera, there are no fixed settings for any kind of enviroment. thank you ac98.Hope that helps, happy shooting!:) i've been using camera for quite a while and i've always kept those 3 stuff in mind my problem was like what you mentioned - juggling between them, and also the error in misjudgement based on LCD output. <=-- seems to be my problem. darn. i guess i haven't been snapping often enough to be a better judge, my photo-count for past 2 years i think less than 2k. what other tips can you give me? This post has been edited by goldfries: Apr 29 2007, 09:50 PM |
|
|
Apr 29 2007, 09:50 PM
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
damn. my post with KLCC Petronas Twin Tower shots went missing!!!!
must've been a server rollback or something. anyway here are the shots.       |
|
|
Apr 30 2007, 03:17 AM
|
|
Senior Member
3,758 posts Joined: Apr 2006 From: Selayang
|
QUOTE(goldfries @ Apr 28 2007, 03:34 AM) thank you ac98. Never trust the LCD, do it like you would using film : You cannot see results, the PC's monitor should be your first result reference, hence you need to have a monitor that is very well tuned or else you'll be arguing how others see your pics and how YOU see your pics after post-processing.i've been using camera for quite a while and i've always kept those 3 stuff in mind my problem was like what you mentioned - juggling between them, and also the error in misjudgement based on LCD output. <=-- seems to be my problem. darn. i guess i haven't been snapping often enough to be a better judge, my photo-count for past 2 years i think less than 2k. what other tips can you give me? |
|
|
Apr 30 2007, 07:46 AM
|
|
All Stars
21,256 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Pekopon
|
KLCC looks funny if u show one tower only
|
|
|
Apr 30 2007, 02:33 PM
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
QUOTE(ac98 @ Apr 30 2007, 03:17 AM) Never trust the LCD, do it like you would using film : You cannot see results, the PC's monitor should be your first result reference, hence you need to have a monitor that is very well tuned or else you'll be arguing how others see your pics and how YOU see your pics after post-processing. yeah. just have to learn better judgement. camera LCD always look nicer. my monitor is Dell 2007 WFP nice monitor to view colors. i do graphic design a lot so i need my display unit to be as accurate as possible. QUOTE(shinchan^^ @ Apr 30 2007, 07:46 AM) KLCC looks funny if u show one tower only haha. what to do. want to to closer shot of the tower. |
|
|
Apr 30 2007, 11:36 PM
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
 oh anyway guys, here's what i got from the moon. This post has been edited by goldfries: May 28 2007, 04:19 AM |
|
|
May 10 2007, 03:44 AM
|
Junior Member
229 posts Joined: Dec 2005
|
QUOTE(goldfries @ Apr 30 2007, 11:36 PM)  oh anyway guys, here's what i got from the moon. Btw bro, do you have any idea abt the price range of Tamron Macro lens? heard they are famous for that? Thanks. Wama1go |
|
|
May 10 2007, 03:13 PM
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
yes sir wama1go, Tamron 70-300mm.
i donno the price of Tamron macro lens. will be looking for them soon. i think. oh wait, after some other things i have to buy. hehe. |
|
|
May 20 2007, 10:09 PM
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
NEW SHOTS!!!
most of the shots were done on 50mm prime lens - what to do, just bought the night before then straight bring it into action.......... here we go!!! this one taken with my 70-300mm at 70mm.  this point onwards are taken with 50mm prime lens.      this one taken with kit lens at 18mm. all other subsequent picture are back to 50mm prime lens.     notice some with yellowish tinge? they were NOT mistakes. after playing with the WB settings i decided to go with the yellowish tinge because that IS what i saw when i was there. thought of capturing as close to reality as possible. the final 2 shots i set the WB to tungsten because i find it too yellow. C&C are always welcome. hope you enjoyed the shots btw. |
|
|
May 27 2007, 03:38 AM
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
OK - i just had a trip to Awana Genting Highlands.
Here are some shots that I managed to snap, it wasn't a happening place as you all know, so what I did was to go around a bit and snap what I found interesting, or at least make something out of them. The shots were mainly snapped from either my room, hotel lobby or the pool side. I went there for a break, so don't expect me to go around that much. now let's start off with some scenery objects. Mixed weather   Sunrise (with not much sun)  Gloomy skies  Slightly brighter gloomy skies  Sun manage to shine through as it begins to set, brings some light into gloomy scenery  |
|
|
May 27 2007, 03:41 AM
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
now for some inanimate objects
Lamp in hotel room  Light in hotel room  Lamp holder in hotel room  Decoration at lobby   Lobby lights (those big ones on ceiling)  Rusted rails by the restaurant  Algae growth on rocks in the pond / garden area  Decorations at the lobby   |
|
|
May 27 2007, 03:45 AM
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
View from the lobby. i composed it to contain some blurred closer objects to frame those plants on the wall along with the shadow.
 Some nice greens from nearby lobby area. I donno, I just admire how beautiful those leaves are.    Decorations at the lobby. (yes, i snapped them while sitting on the sofa.)   Scenes from the garden    |
|
|
May 27 2007, 03:49 AM
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
Da dragonflyz. Yeah, took some hard work snapping it. The rest of the shots didn't turn out that well due to lack of sunlight.
 Some plants around the golf course. First picture shows the shade of green vs the maroon background PLUS the subtle shades of the hill. Second picture is just to highlight the maroon on the darker background.   From this point onwards it's all flowers        |
|
|
May 27 2007, 03:53 AM
|
Senior Member
686 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
u need more DOF
|
|
|
May 27 2007, 03:54 AM
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
Yes, all flowers
This shot I'm trying to show the texture on the Hibiscus' petal  And this shot, it that part of the Hibiscus. Pollen or something, I don't know.  Sorry la, the Hibiscus were snapped at a shaded area in the restaurant. So what I did was to experiment having the object vs darker background to see whether I can off-set the effect of the lack of lighting. (sorry if what i say doesn't make sense either)    Notice the bee? Maybe it's a wasp or hornet, I don't know. Just snap only la.      ALRIGHT - that's all folks!!!!!!!! I hope you enjoy the photos taken by yours truly. C&Cs are welcome. This post has been edited by goldfries: May 27 2007, 03:56 AM |
|
|
May 27 2007, 03:56 AM
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
QUOTE(tongyam @ May 27 2007, 03:53 AM) u need more DOF wah eh. still want some more DOF ah? i did the best to my lens already. the flower shots bokeh kau kau but some of the shots, sorry la cannot. tried already. my equipment not power wan la. all snapped using kit lens and the cheapest 70-300mm lens i can get on the market. |
|
|
May 27 2007, 03:59 AM
|
|
Senior Member
686 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
|
|
|
May 27 2007, 04:02 AM
|
Senior Member
1,528 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
Someone went trigger happy up there eh
Didn't really like the plant shots, they seemed somewhat bland to me I think the last plant shot would be great if it had morning dew on it. Always wanted to take one such picture myself but I wake up too darn late for that The first picture, overlooking the golf course is pretty nice though /edit Plant shots being the first few that were posted, not the flowers This post has been edited by Chinoz: May 27 2007, 04:05 AM |
|
|
May 27 2007, 04:02 AM
|
|
Senior Member
686 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
QUOTE(goldfries @ May 27 2007, 03:56 AM) wah eh. hm, wat is the setting neh? bokeh nice liao still want some more DOF ah? i did the best to my lens already. the flower shots bokeh kau kau but some of the shots, sorry la cannot. tried already. my equipment not power wan la. all snapped using kit lens and the cheapest 70-300mm lens i can get on the market.ex, this http://www.goldfries.com/images/gallery/al...0525awana37.jpg the lower part of the pink abit blur, but this kind of snap very creative, u using close up filter ar? |
|
|
May 27 2007, 02:11 PM
|
|
Junior Member
414 posts Joined: Jul 2006
|
most of the flowers shots are overexposed.
i'm not a pro macro shooter but i like to slightly underexposed my flower shots to retain the sharpness and details and readjust the level of the exposure in PP |
|
|
May 27 2007, 04:10 PM
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
QUOTE(Chinoz @ May 27 2007, 04:02 AM) Didn't really like the plant shots, they seemed somewhat bland to me yeah. no problem. like i mentioned, the purpose was to attempt in mixing the colors of the subject and background. /edit Plant shots being the first few that were posted, not the flowers QUOTE(Chinoz @ May 27 2007, 04:02 AM) I think the last plant shot would be great if it had morning dew on it. Always wanted to take one such picture myself but I wake up too darn late for that yeah. i've love to have that too, unfortunately i was snapping during lunch hour after 10 laps of swimming. morning ah? i go there to rest la so sleep kau kau. wake up to snap the sunrise horizon and back to sleep again. hehe. QUOTE(Chinoz @ May 27 2007, 04:02 AM) The first picture, overlooking the golf course is pretty nice though thank you. QUOTE(tongyam @ May 27 2007, 04:02 AM) hm, wat is the setting neh? bokeh nice liao just zoom kau kau only. snapped at lowest aperture available which was f5.6. QUOTE(tongyam @ May 27 2007, 04:02 AM) ex, this yeah the thing is i'm not parellel with the petal. so the macro focusing will be off on certain areas. the only thing i didn't like about that shot was that it's pretty dim but i can't resist the flower at that area so i decided to make the best of what i can out of it. http://www.goldfries.com/images/gallery/al...0525awana37.jpg the lower part of the pink abit blur, but this kind of snap very creative, u using close up filter ar? here's one that i missed out QUOTE(Gadget_Freak @ May 27 2007, 02:11 PM) most of the flowers shots are overexposed. take a closer look, i personally don't find it over-exposed because most of the flowers are actually bright yellow on the upper layer. coupled with the darker background, it looks even brighter. some more snapped under noon's bright (and HOT) sunlight. if you look around the same type of flowers, you'll notice that some have a distinct gradient from bright yellow to red. some are purely orange, others are orange to red. blablablablalb - that's because there are so many of them, each having varying degree of coloration. This post has been edited by goldfries: May 28 2007, 03:52 AM |
|
|
May 27 2007, 08:50 PM
|
Junior Member
89 posts Joined: Oct 2007
|
Nice. I like your bokeh shots, goldfries.
|
|
|
May 28 2007, 10:30 AM
|
Senior Member
1,766 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Klang Valley
|
You have definitely made the flowers look nicer than it should be... Great work man.
I guess I should be more sensitive to the surrounding when I go vacation. Never though a simple plant shot can be so beautiful. Two thumbs up man. Your overall composition is good. |
|
|
May 28 2007, 10:39 AM
|
Senior Member
1,573 posts Joined: Oct 2004 From: Slave in Seremban...
|
Very nice shots of the flowers and plants with great bokeh.
|
|
|
May 28 2007, 03:22 PM
|
 
Elite
7,826 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
QUOTE(tongyam @ May 27 2007, 03:53 AM) u need more DOF Wah you need to be more specific right? You want the TS to have a shallower DOF or a deeper one? |
|
|
May 30 2007, 05:25 PM
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
QUOTE(katheryna @ May 27 2007, 08:50 PM) Nice. I like your bokeh shots, goldfries. thank you.QUOTE(kelvinyam @ May 28 2007, 10:30 AM) You have definitely made the flowers look nicer than it should be... Great work man. thank you too. I guess I should be more sensitive to the surrounding when I go vacation. Never though a simple plant shot can be so beautiful. Two thumbs up man. Your overall composition is good. yes, we should pay around to surroundings, even our own backyard. for the trip, i made it a point to highlight all the things we often overlook.the flowers are damn small man. some about 1cm, some 5mm. arrgghh. as you can see, i didn't like the idea of flowers filling up most part of the picture, it was adjusted to follow Rule of Thirds. QUOTE(CompMac @ May 28 2007, 10:39 AM) Very nice shots of the flowers and plants with great bokeh. thank you. your shots also nice mah. QUOTE(Mavik @ May 28 2007, 03:22 PM) Wah you need to be more specific right? You want the TS to have a shallower DOF or a deeper one? hehe. doesn't matter. the DOF is limited by my lens. if i lower the aperture then the there's lesser bokeh effect already. not that nice also. |
|
|
May 30 2007, 06:28 PM
|
|
Junior Member
470 posts Joined: Aug 2006
|
QUOTE(goldfries @ May 30 2007, 05:25 PM) hehe. doesn't matter. the DOF is limited by my lens. if i lower the aperture then the there's lesser bokeh effect already. not that nice also. I finally got to play with bokeh for once last Sunday. A new friend I made on that paddy field outing was kind enough to lend me his D80 and teach me how to use a DSLR and take bokeh shots. It was so cool! Man I wish I had a DSLR now. |
|
|
May 30 2007, 06:40 PM
|
|
Senior Member
1,573 posts Joined: Oct 2004 From: Slave in Seremban...
|
Be careful. Too much poisoning is bad for your wallet.
|
|
|
May 30 2007, 06:43 PM
|
|
Junior Member
470 posts Joined: Aug 2006
|
QUOTE(CompMac @ May 30 2007, 06:40 PM) Be careful. Too much poisoning is bad for your wallet. Also got poisoned by a super wide angle lens, 10-22mm i think, and a ND Grad filter Antidote will only come 2 or more years later.... |
|
|
May 30 2007, 06:51 PM
|
Senior Member
2,293 posts Joined: Feb 2006 From: Sarawak
|
Woah....so close the macro shots...
nice shots!! |
|
|
May 30 2007, 11:32 PM
|
Senior Member
666 posts Joined: Jan 2005 From: Penang
|
Maybe can enhance a bit on sharpness?
|
|
|
May 30 2007, 11:52 PM
|
Junior Member
294 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: PJ
|
http://www.goldfries.com/images/gallery/al...0525awana31.jpg
I like the bokeh from this one.... u really Mat Bokeh laaa... |
|
|
May 31 2007, 12:57 AM
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
QUOTE(Aurora Boreali @ May 30 2007, 06:28 PM) I finally got to play with bokeh for once last Sunday. A new friend I made on that paddy field outing was kind enough to lend me his D80 and teach me how to use a DSLR and take bokeh shots. It was so cool! Man I wish I had a DSLR now. g88 ah? well doesn't matter. yeah you have nice compositions. DSLR then you can play more stuff.QUOTE(CompMac @ May 30 2007, 06:40 PM) Be careful. Too much poisoning is bad for your wallet. heed this advice well, for me next week another 4 digits gone. QUOTE(Cosef @ May 30 2007, 06:51 PM) Woah....so close the macro shots... thank you. i still lack a proper macro lens, this 70-300mm's macro shots are 1:2 only. nice shots!! QUOTE(cityfish @ May 30 2007, 11:32 PM) Maybe can enhance a bit on sharpness? which picture? anyway all the pictures are choosen are the sharp already. after resize, apply sharpen filter again cos you know la resizing pixels joined and all. QUOTE(afs @ May 30 2007, 11:52 PM) http://www.goldfries.com/images/gallery/al...0525awana31.jpg thank you.I like the bokeh from this one.... u really Mat Bokeh laaa... btw you guys know that the picture set starts from Page 4, right? |
|
|
Jun 4 2007, 10:31 AM
|
Junior Member
484 posts Joined: Dec 2006
|
QUOTE(goldfries @ Apr 21 2007, 12:41 AM) before i go for the Fashion show again, here's additional pictures from my earlier shoot. Are those pics from the Tamron 70-300? Mind sharing the Exif? Would like to know the capability of the lens for indoor shooting as i'm thinking to get one |
|
|
Jun 4 2007, 02:46 PM
|
Senior Member
7,214 posts Joined: Oct 2006 From: Kamino
|
goldfries...
ur shots damn nice la he bokeh... can i know what lens u using? |
|
|
Jun 4 2007, 03:29 PM
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
QUOTE(spetnaz @ Jun 4 2007, 10:31 AM) Are those pics from the Tamron 70-300? Mind sharing the Exif? Would like to know the capability of the lens for indoor shooting as i'm thinking to get one wah eh you quoted the album that i find i did my worst la. btw which shot you referring to? yes, they're taken using Tamron 70-300mm. from what i gathered so far, the Sigma 70-300mm is better. QUOTE(xandman @ Jun 4 2007, 02:46 PM) goldfries... thank you. ur shots damn nice la he bokeh... can i know what lens u using? i only have 3 lens so far. 18-55 canon kit lens + 70-300mm tamron + 50mm f1.8 canon prime lens. the 1U fashion show is 70-300m tamron normal mode. flowers, 70-300mm tamron on macro mode. midvalley fashion show is mix of 70-300mm tamron and 50mm f1.8 canon. |
|
|
Jun 4 2007, 04:31 PM
|
|
Junior Member
484 posts Joined: Dec 2006
|
QUOTE(goldfries @ Jun 4 2007, 03:29 PM) wah eh you quoted the album that i find i did my worst la. This 2 btw which shot you referring to? yes, they're taken using Tamron 70-300mm. from what i gathered so far, the Sigma 70-300mm is better. thank you. i only have 3 lens so far. 18-55 canon kit lens + 70-300mm tamron + 50mm f1.8 canon prime lens. the 1U fashion show is 70-300m tamron normal mode. flowers, 70-300mm tamron on macro mode. midvalley fashion show is mix of 70-300mm tamron and 50mm f1.8 canon. Those are the best in terms of sharpness Or any exif for pics that you zoomed beyond 200mm or max tele at 300mm This post has been edited by spetnaz: Jun 4 2007, 04:37 PM |
|
|
Jun 4 2007, 07:25 PM
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
PIC #1
1/160, F5.6, 70mm, ISO800. WB auto (that's why yelllowish) PIC #2 1/125, F5.6, 259mm, ISO800. WB auto (that's why yelllowish) those pics resized then PP on sharpness a bit. IMO they're not as sharp as my other pics, after all those that you quoted are my 1st DSLR outing. subsequent ones are better, and i rarely zoom at full 300mm because i use hand, no IS / VR / SR whatever you call those anti-shake tech.the only time i always zoom 300mm is when shooting moon. that also not that clear on the moon's details (not telescope). |
|
|
Jun 4 2007, 09:29 PM
|
|
Junior Member
484 posts Joined: Dec 2006
|
QUOTE(goldfries @ Jun 4 2007, 07:25 PM) PIC #1 Thanks for sharing. I'm a newbie myself. Pic #2 thou only 1/125 @ 259mm, but for me, the pic is quiet sharp. Personally, i would prefer the Auto WB for the warm colour rather than the Tungsten WB which will turn the pic bluish (my taste lar).1/160, F5.6, 70mm, ISO800. WB auto (that's why yelllowish) PIC #2 1/125, F5.6, 259mm, ISO800. WB auto (that's why yelllowish) those pics resized then PP on sharpness a bit. IMO they're not as sharp as my other pics, after all those that you quoted are my 1st DSLR outing. subsequent ones are better, and i rarely zoom at full 300mm because i use hand, no IS / VR / SR whatever you call those anti-shake tech.the only time i always zoom 300mm is when shooting moon. that also not that clear on the moon's details (not telescope). |
|
|
Jun 5 2007, 11:24 AM
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
QUOTE(spetnaz @ Jun 4 2007, 09:29 PM) Thanks for sharing. I'm a newbie myself. Pic #2 thou only 1/125 @ 259mm, but for me, the pic is quiet sharp. Personally, i would prefer the Auto WB for the warm colour rather than the Tungsten WB which will turn the pic bluish (my taste lar). glad ya like it!! yeah it's preference, depends on what you want out of the picture.some times yellowish tinge does make it feel nicer. |
|
|
Aug 7 2007, 08:43 PM
|
Junior Member
47 posts Joined: Aug 2007
|
arh ha! photographing is my favourite part. I'm a user of 5D. I shot mostly on landscape. Well, to decide if a photo is well exposed or not, you must always refer to the histrogram. Check www.dpreview.com for more info on photographing. I've been selling my photos at google and if you are interested go take a look.
|
|
|
Aug 7 2007, 10:06 PM
|
Senior Member
3,114 posts Joined: Dec 2006
|
QUOTE(goldfries @ Jun 5 2007, 11:24 AM) glad ya like it!! i like your photos...good work... yeah it's preference, depends on what you want out of the picture.some times yellowish tinge does make it feel nicer. |
|
|
Aug 31 2007, 01:52 AM
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
    the rest are at http://www.goldfries.com/inperson/ Added on August 31, 2007, 1:54 am QUOTE(tinker @ Aug 7 2007, 08:43 PM) arh ha! photographing is my favourite part. I'm a user of 5D. I shot mostly on landscape. Well, to decide if a photo is well exposed or not, you must always refer to the histrogram. Check www.dpreview.com for more info on photographing. I've been selling my photos at google and if you are interested go take a look. interesting. anyway i still have a long way to go when it comes to working with cameras. QUOTE(orenzai @ Aug 7 2007, 10:06 PM) i like your photos...good work... thank you!This post has been edited by goldfries: Aug 31 2007, 01:55 AM |
|
|
Sep 1 2007, 03:05 PM
|
Senior Member
907 posts Joined: Nov 2005 
|
very nice pictures from goldfries!
|
|
|
Sep 1 2007, 05:17 PM
|
|
Senior Member
2,293 posts Joined: Feb 2006 From: Sarawak
|
Wow, i see paintball shot out from the gun....
Nice one. |
|
|
Sep 1 2007, 05:28 PM
|
|
Senior Member
3,114 posts Joined: Dec 2006
|
woa...nice dude... last shot somemore can see the paintball kena smth and burst...haha...
|
|
|
Sep 1 2007, 11:04 PM
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
thanks guys.
from now onwards i'll only highlight a few and the rest are on my website. this way, at least you're not FORCED to load them pictures. |
|
|
Sep 3 2007, 10:07 AM
|
Senior Member
976 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: Newcastle Upon Tyne
|
eventhough i am a noob in photographing.. i do enjoy viewing ur photo!! nice shoot !!
|
|
|
Sep 5 2007, 01:02 AM
|
Junior Member
188 posts Joined: Jul 2006
|
You're inside the field during the paintball competition and snapping pics? Salute you laaa...~
|
|
|
Sep 5 2007, 01:22 AM
|
|
Junior Member
295 posts Joined: Apr 2006
|
yeah,.. u did shoot from inside the compound?? that was brave.. nice action-packed photos..
|
|
|
Sep 5 2007, 04:01 AM
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
QUOTE(PoisonIvy82 @ Sep 5 2007, 01:02 AM) You're inside the field during the paintball competition and snapping pics? Salute you laaa...~ QUOTE(diwant @ Sep 5 2007, 01:22 AM) yeah,.. u did shoot from inside the compound?? that was brave.. nice action-packed photos.. yup. i was in the field.this was my 2nd time shooting in the field. first time was when a family from NY was playing. i got hit then but luckily those were house-markers (a.k.a. the gun given by the paintball company la) so this trip was 2nd time, this time it's PRO players using guns that were more expensive than my camera + lens. and yeah i got a few hits. the blue-black on my thigh is still there. the tricky part is you're using DSLR but you can't get close to view-finder cos you're wearing a mask. the eye is easily 3 - 5 cm away from view-finder. you also have to understand the game and read the game to get good shots, and yeah, you have to learn to tolerate the pain. this part a bit creepy, i'm still learning to tolerate the pain. |
|
|
Sep 5 2007, 08:13 AM
|
|
Junior Member
295 posts Joined: Apr 2006
|
cool man. i played paitball few times before, but to shoot photos from INSIDE the playing area is something that i'd give second thought.. hehe. U know, the pain is ok, but if the camera got hit, that's the REAL pain!! hahaha..
|
|
|
Sep 5 2007, 11:14 AM
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
eh no joke man. some people kena before, hit by pellet on the lens and went through to the body!
i was advised to use at least 2 filters to take the impact of pellet on lens. and since mine is not weather-sealed like EOS 1D and those L series lens, i use towel to cover my gear but sometimes still lose track of the towel la. |
|
|
Sep 11 2007, 01:26 AM
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
Basketball Tournament!!!
Day 2 (full gallery here)    Day 1 pretty much sucks due to low-light condition and my kampung-of-the-art gear but here's the URL if you wish to view still. |
|
|
Sep 11 2007, 07:12 AM
|
Senior Member
1,067 posts Joined: Nov 2004 From: Puncak Jalil
|
QUOTE(goldfries @ Sep 5 2007, 04:01 AM) the tricky part is you're using DSLR but you can't get close to view-finder cos you're wearing a mask. the eye is easily 3 - 5 cm away from view-finder. you also have to understand the game and read the game to get good shots, and yeah, you have to learn to tolerate the pain. this part a bit creepy, i'm still learning to tolerate the pain. |
|
|
Oct 15 2007, 07:00 PM
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
QUOTE(r4ydc24 @ Sep 11 2007, 07:12 AM) OMG!!! n u still manage to capture the moment dat the ball ejects fr the gun + superb bokeh? sorry didn't reply you. Yeah, a lot of attempts of course, that's where burst mode comes in handy!anyway here's my new range of shots I decided to walk around my father's garden and see what I could get out of it. It's all about discovering the beauty of an otherwise normal setting. Day in, Day out. Park car, get into the house. Little time do we take to enjoy the minor beauty that's around us, such as this tiny garden (or lawn if you wish) around the porch area. #1  #2  #3  #4  #5  #6  #7  #8  #9  This post has been edited by goldfries: Oct 15 2007, 07:04 PM |
|
|
Oct 15 2007, 07:01 PM
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
#10
 #11  #12  #13  #14  #15  #16  #17  |
|
|
Oct 15 2007, 09:26 PM
|
|
Senior Member
3,114 posts Joined: Dec 2006
|
NICE!!!
i love your abstracts bro... |
|
|
Oct 15 2007, 11:22 PM
|
|
Junior Member
144 posts Joined: Apr 2005 From: Wangsa Maju x Labuan
|
Nice colours and interesting composition... Well Done...
|
|
|
Oct 16 2007, 12:16 AM
|
Senior Member
2,040 posts Joined: Oct 2004 From: UK
|
nice compo...ur lens damn sharp wei...nice !
|
|
|
Oct 16 2007, 01:06 AM
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
thanks guys. forgot to specify
350D + kit lens + tamron 70-300 (for macro mode) post processing is just resize to fit the frame then sharpen. adjustment on brightness & contrast is done as necessary. |
|
|
Oct 18 2007, 07:33 AM
|
Senior Member
972 posts Joined: Mar 2007 From: Kuala Lumpur 
|
damm... ur macro shots makes me envy ! nice job !
|
|
|
Oct 18 2007, 08:23 PM
|
Junior Member
293 posts Joined: Sep 2005
|
Picture 1 .. the water one .. is a creative shoot
nice man |
|
|
Oct 19 2007, 02:03 AM
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
QUOTE(bbtat @ Oct 18 2007, 08:23 PM) Picture 1 .. the water one .. is a creative shoot thanks! nice maninitially it was to capture the reflection of the sky in the water. then as i compose the shot, i noticed that the 3 plastics could form a nice circle combo. |
|
|
Oct 20 2007, 12:31 PM
|
|
Senior Member
1,766 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Klang Valley
|
I like #9, the texture is nice.
Anyway, don't stay at home. Go out and shoot |
|
|
Oct 20 2007, 05:29 PM
|
|
Senior Member
1,067 posts Joined: Nov 2004 From: Puncak Jalil
|
WOWOWOWOW!!! GENG wor~!!!!! abstract, me cup o tea... feel like wanna go out for abstract outing wif u.. p/s: when wanna shoot paintball together?  |
|
|
Nov 3 2007, 12:46 PM
|
|
Junior Member
470 posts Joined: Aug 2006
|
Sometimes it's not easy to find subjects for our photos, don't you think? I feel the same for you photos #2, 3 and 6.
Although many people have already said it - I love photo #1. The more I use a dSLR, the more I want it. ARGH |
|
|
Nov 3 2007, 04:10 PM
|
|
Senior Member
3,114 posts Joined: Dec 2006
|
lolz...its all in your eyes..you either make it or break it... haha... your absracts were nice but those flower shots.. i think you gotta post process it a lil bit...13 and 14 seems to be lack of contrast and 14 is a bit over exposed... just my opinion...
|
|
|
Nov 3 2007, 06:37 PM
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
QUOTE(Aurora Boreali @ Nov 3 2007, 12:46 PM) Sometimes it's not easy to find subjects for our photos, don't you think? I feel the same for you photos #2, 3 and 6. eh. #2, #3 and #6 no subject wan la, they're abstracts mah. see, ah, #2 is a composition of lines. #3 is like lines + circular patterns mixed #6 is again lines, vertical, horizontal and diagonals combined. QUOTE(orenzai @ Nov 3 2007, 04:10 PM) lolz...its all in your eyes..you either make it or break it... haha... your absracts were nice but those flower shots.. i think you gotta post process it a lil bit...13 and 14 seems to be lack of contrast and 14 is a bit over exposed... just my opinion... nah, don't worry.for #13, the flower was colored as it is, same goes to the leaves. for #14, the petal was bright pinkish while the leaves are light green and the wall at the background was beige of some sort. they're now just how it looked like in real life. @r4ydc24 I'm set for another paintball shoot in Dec. |
|
|
Nov 3 2007, 07:02 PM
|
|
Junior Member
470 posts Joined: Aug 2006
|
QUOTE(goldfries @ Nov 3 2007, 06:37 PM) eh. #2, #3 and #6 no subject wan la, they're abstracts mah. Oh Oh... hahaha I noob mah, didn't know how to see. see, ah, #2 is a composition of lines. #3 is like lines + circular patterns mixed #6 is again lines, vertical, horizontal and diagonals combined. Thank you for pointing that out |
|
|
Nov 3 2007, 07:18 PM
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
QUOTE(Aurora Boreali @ Nov 3 2007, 07:02 PM) Oh Oh... hahaha I noob mah, didn't know how to see. hehe. i wonder if you remember the talk that we went to, done my Mr L.Pang. a few months back. Thank you for pointing that out Remember PATTERNS? |
|
|
Nov 3 2007, 10:03 PM
|
Senior Member
5,533 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Kuala Lumpur
|
hey, what are the settings for the last basketball pic?
|
|
|
Nov 3 2007, 11:06 PM
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
1/500 | F5.6 | 50mm | ISO-100
|
|
|
Nov 4 2007, 01:21 AM
|
|
Senior Member
5,533 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Kuala Lumpur
|
do you think i could get shots like that using kit lens?
|
|
|
Nov 4 2007, 08:10 AM
|
|
Senior Member
3,114 posts Joined: Dec 2006
|
QUOTE(goldfries @ Nov 3 2007, 06:37 PM) eh. #2, #3 and #6 no subject wan la, they're abstracts mah. i guess you like the flowers as it is...but don you think without editing it a bit, it doesnt stand out from others? just my opinion lar..hehe... see, ah, #2 is a composition of lines. #3 is like lines + circular patterns mixed #6 is again lines, vertical, horizontal and diagonals combined. nah, don't worry. for #13, the flower was colored as it is, same goes to the leaves. for #14, the petal was bright pinkish while the leaves are light green and the wall at the background was beige of some sort. they're now just how it looked like in real life. @r4ydc24 I'm set for another paintball shoot in Dec. QUOTE(goliath @ Nov 4 2007, 01:21 AM) do you think i could get shots like that using kit lens? of course you can... |
|
|
Nov 4 2007, 09:52 AM
|
|
Senior Member
5,533 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Kuala Lumpur
|
QUOTE(orenzai @ Nov 4 2007, 08:10 AM) of course you can... hhmm.. that's weird.. it is either i get blurred hands or dark pictures |
|
|
Nov 4 2007, 09:56 AM
|
|
Senior Member
3,114 posts Joined: Dec 2006
|
should not be gua. try using the settings he used.. that basketball shot was under birght sun...so it should be underexposed...make sure your aperture is wide though(small f number)
|
|
|
Nov 4 2007, 02:56 PM
|
|
Senior Member
5,533 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Kuala Lumpur
|
well, i'm trying to shoot pics of my nephew inside the house. so, at being young age, he's hyperactive. the problem is i keep getting blurred hands/legs because he moved too much. i tweak my Aperture and Shutter but I'll get either that (blurred hands/legs) or dark pics (because of EV at -2). Is there any thing else I need to tweak? My WB is auto so as my ISO.
|
|
|
Nov 4 2007, 02:59 PM
|
|
Senior Member
3,114 posts Joined: Dec 2006
|
oh..indoor pics is much different...maybe you could try putting your settings at :
-f5.6 -ISO800. Do not go up to 1600. only do so if really necessary -maybe you could try about 1/150? but be sure to have enough light that is... why do you need to set the EV to -2? that will only make it under exposed... |
|
|
Nov 4 2007, 03:11 PM
|
|
Senior Member
5,533 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Kuala Lumpur
|
you see, when i adjust my aperture (and/or shutter), the stupid Flash Compensation meter will move.
|
|
|
Nov 4 2007, 03:28 PM
|
|
Senior Member
3,114 posts Joined: Dec 2006
|
 is there such a thing? i think what you saw is the metering...not flash compensation...that meter is to tell you whether your pictures are properly exposed or not... Flash compensation will never move unless tweaked... |
|
|
Nov 4 2007, 03:34 PM
|
|
Senior Member
5,533 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Kuala Lumpur
|
QUOTE(orenzai @ Nov 4 2007, 03:28 PM) is there such a thing? i think what you saw is the metering...not flash compensation...that meter is to tell you whether your pictures are properly exposed or not... Flash compensation will never move unless tweaked...i'll try to bump up my ISO now plus adjusting my flash compensation . |
|
|
Nov 4 2007, 03:35 PM
|
|
Senior Member
3,114 posts Joined: Dec 2006
|
erm...i guess we could discuss this in pm...later goldfries say we spamming is his thread
|
|
|
Nov 4 2007, 04:04 PM
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
QUOTE(goliath @ Nov 4 2007, 01:21 AM) do you think i could get shots like that using kit lens? eh, i'm using kit lens laQUOTE(orenzai @ Nov 4 2007, 08:10 AM) i guess you like the flowers as it is...but don you think without editing it a bit, it doesnt stand out from others? just my opinion lar..hehe... hehe. preferencial already lor. of course you can... QUOTE(orenzai @ Nov 4 2007, 03:35 PM) erm...i guess we could discuss this in pm...later goldfries say we spamming is his thread if my pics spark discussion that are helpful, i see no harm la. as stated in the Posting Guidelines 1) This subforum is for posting photographs and related discussion such as technique and execution (lighting, composition, posing, makeup etc.). Discussion about photographers or models is prohibited. goliath, don't be afraid to push ISO up as high as you can. 1600 - 3200. also nmind la. whether the noise is acceptable is for you to decide. assuming you're using DSLR, try Aperture priority mode with highest aperture available at highest ISO setting. |
|
|
Nov 4 2007, 04:06 PM
|
|
Senior Member
5,533 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Kuala Lumpur
|
QUOTE(goldfries @ Nov 4 2007, 04:04 PM) goliath, don't be afraid to push ISO up as high as you can. 1600 - 3200. also nmind la. whether the noise is acceptable is for you to decide. Yeap. I'm using 40D. I tell you, the weight is killing my shots.. Most of my shots are blurred because of the d*mn camera weight.assuming you're using DSLR, try Aperture priority mode with highest aperture available at highest ISO setting. I'll try as you said.. |
|
|
Nov 4 2007, 04:31 PM
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
eh. your 40D comes with grip?
a 350D with grip also heavy already.which lens are you using with your 40D in that situation? F3.5-5.6 18-55? |
|
|
Nov 4 2007, 04:45 PM
|
|
Senior Member
5,533 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Kuala Lumpur
|
QUOTE(goldfries @ Nov 4 2007, 04:31 PM) eh. your 40D comes with grip? Nope. Just the body and lens (F3.5-5.6 18-55mm) a 350D with grip also heavy already.which lens are you using with your 40D in that situation? F3.5-5.6 18-55? I think I can use it as my temporary dumbbell (if it comes with the grip) |
|
|
Nov 4 2007, 04:51 PM
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
i think my 350D + grip is heavier.
ok here's the thing with the F3.5-5.6 18-55mm, once you zoom to 55mm range the aperture goes down to F5.6 and in order to compensate under-exposure you'll have to either raise the sensitivity (ISO) or lower the shutter speed or both. that's why go for Aperture priority mode, set it to the highest ISO sensitivity (yours should be 3200) then adjust the EV meter to center. then try snapping. if the light is terribly low then the noise would be more visible but you have to think la, you rather noise and decent picture or little noise but unusable pictures? if the setting works fine, try lower the sensitivity to ISO1600. you have to play around the settings to see what works best for your environment. remember that your sensitivity setting and the aperture limitation will determine the shutter speed in the end. that's why people are always aiming for lens with higher aperture, such as the Tamron 17-50 f2.8 |
|
|
Nov 4 2007, 04:55 PM
|
|
Senior Member
5,533 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Kuala Lumpur
|
ok.. thanks for the tip.
now, my nephew cannot run away from my camera *insert evil laugh* what about this flash compensation?  |
|
|
Nov 4 2007, 05:50 PM
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
just to confirm what you're referring to.
is this the one? the line below the # of shots left  well at least that's what the interface is like on mine. |
|
|
Nov 4 2007, 05:57 PM
|
|
Senior Member
5,533 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Kuala Lumpur
|
Yeap.. That's the one..
What's the purpose of sign on the right of '# of shots left'? |
|
|
Nov 4 2007, 06:06 PM
|
|
Senior Member
3,114 posts Joined: Dec 2006
|
haha... 40d not very heavy lar... i like it quite lot actually.. i mean the weight makes it feel more solid.. i feel that my d40 is a lil too light and weightless...tak de feel...haha..
|
|
|
Nov 4 2007, 06:12 PM
|
|
Senior Member
5,533 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Kuala Lumpur
|
QUOTE(orenzai @ Nov 4 2007, 06:06 PM) haha... 40d not very heavy lar... i like it quite lot actually.. i mean the weight makes it feel more solid.. i feel that my d40 is a lil too light and weightless...tak de feel...haha.. Well.. I was exaggerating only la It takes time to adapt |
|
|
Nov 4 2007, 06:16 PM
|
|
Senior Member
3,114 posts Joined: Dec 2006
|
after you have tried the setting goldfries and i recommended, do come back and tell us the results
|
|
|
Nov 8 2007, 07:48 PM
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
I went to Gabai Waterfalls today.
    * No, it's not under-exposed. This was the actual scene, it was a pretty dark area.  Just sharing. There's total of 58 shots so I can't be displaying all here. |
|
|
Nov 9 2007, 12:08 PM
|
|
Senior Member
784 posts Joined: Feb 2005 From: Selangor
|
Nice shot bro, the water stream looks beautiful. P&S digicam sure can't get result like this.
|
|
|
Nov 9 2007, 12:12 PM
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
thanks. that's just 5 out of the 58 shots, not counting those i decide not to publish.
P&S hrmm....... i think might be possible. depending on the feature. |
|
|
Nov 9 2007, 12:13 PM
|
Senior Member
748 posts Joined: Sep 2007 From: No Man Lands
|
using ND4 filter?
|
|
|
Nov 9 2007, 12:13 PM
|
|
Staff
7,529 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
QUOTE(goldfries @ Nov 8 2007, 07:48 PM) * No, it's not under-exposed. This was the actual scene, it was a pretty dark area. |
|
|
Nov 9 2007, 12:17 PM
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
QUOTE(szyap @ Nov 9 2007, 12:13 PM) using ND4 filter? no filter.edited : ok, UV filter only. QUOTE(nairud @ Nov 9 2007, 12:13 PM) if you have a flash and shooting at long exp, i think you can make the stones a bit more exposed. hold the flash, not mounted on the camera. once in a while burst some flashes onto the stones. *altong's method* next time you show me. this is just 1/2 of the entire picture cos the top part not so nice la, can see electric cable or something. this bottom part was how it looked like on that day. i always like my shots to look as it is.btw my shots undergo only resize and sharpen after resize. no color adjustments. brightness and contrast for about +-5 photos only, that also minimal touches. This post has been edited by goldfries: Nov 9 2007, 12:18 PM |
|
|
Nov 9 2007, 12:19 PM
|
|
Senior Member
3,758 posts Joined: Apr 2006 From: Selayang
|
I MIGHT be going this weekend, you wanna join me?
|
|
|
Nov 9 2007, 12:22 PM
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
aiyoh. i go yesterday and now i have to rush my work already la.
i'm sure the pics will inspire a lot to join you. but i think you go this weekend a bit creepy la, since it's holiday weekend and it could be really damn pack unless you go early and leave early. |
|
|
Nov 9 2007, 02:47 PM
|
|
Junior Member
470 posts Joined: Aug 2006
|
I read from somewhere that you should use some filter (forgot whether it's CPL or ND filter) to avoid the water stream from being blown, as can be seen from your photos.
My 2 cents la, I'm no expert. |
|
|
Nov 9 2007, 02:49 PM
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
which picture?
cos all that i display was the outcome that i wanted for that day.edited : ok, more like the outcome that i'm happy with for the day. no CPL la. no ND la. i go with what i have only and attempt to make best with it, as usual.This post has been edited by goldfries: Nov 9 2007, 02:51 PM |
|
|
Nov 17 2007, 01:14 AM
|
Junior Member
214 posts Joined: Nov 2006 From: Kepong, KL
|
Hey goldfries,
I got a noobie question for you, I hope you won't mind me asking. How did you get the effect of the stream on picture 1, 2 and 4? Do you mount your cam on a tripod and let it go on a long shutter speed? Mind providing the info? |
|
|
Nov 17 2007, 04:52 AM
|
Senior Member
2,967 posts Joined: May 2006
|
the first, second and third pic have nice aperture settings...gorgeusly captured details in DEF
low iso ke? noise is second to nothing haha ur using 350d and can get those good s**t this is the stock lense or? haha my friend just got a hand me down 400d from dad dunnow how it'll perform but nice one goldfries as always This post has been edited by gtoforce: Nov 17 2007, 04:54 AM |
|
|
Nov 18 2007, 10:26 PM
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
QUOTE(CutieLynette @ Nov 17 2007, 01:14 AM) How did you get the effect of the stream on picture 1, 2 and 4? Do you mount your cam on a tripod and let it go on a long shutter speed? Mind providing the info? yup. i put on tripod and set it to slower shutter speed. the water moves fast, so half a second or 1 second also can get nice streaming already. you can check out the rest of the pictures (all 58) at my gallery. see any you like, you can PM me or ask here. I'll be happy to share. QUOTE(gtoforce @ Nov 17 2007, 04:52 AM) the first, second and third pic have nice aperture settings...gorgeusly captured details in DEF thank you. low iso ke? noise is second to nothing haha ur using 350d and can get those good s**t this is the stock lense or? haha my friend just got a hand me down 400d from dad dunnow how it'll perform but nice one goldfries as always to check out the rest of the pictures at by website. i can't post all here la. load too much. unless you guys want it all here then tell me la. just don't complain the loading time. and yes, a lot of my shots are taken with 350D kit lens and the Tamron 70-300mm yes, mostly snapped in ISO100 - 200 range. use lowest ISO and lowest aperture so that i can manipulate the shutter speed to get those effects. |
|
|
Nov 29 2007, 12:12 AM
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
#1
 #2  #3  #4  #5  #6  #7  #8  This post has been edited by goldfries: Nov 29 2007, 03:18 AM |
|
|
Nov 29 2007, 01:43 AM
|
|
Junior Member
214 posts Joined: Nov 2006 From: Kepong, KL
|
OMG, is that Kepong Sentral? Looks awfully familiar as it's the station near my place! LOL
Great shots by the way, I'm still frustrated at the kind of results I'm getting with my 400D. I got a great camera but I can't shoot well enough. Maybe I should give you some tea and call you sifu, can? Added on November 29, 2007, 1:48 amOh my, it IS Kepong Sentral! This post has been edited by CutieLynette: Nov 29 2007, 01:48 AM |
|
|
Nov 29 2007, 03:21 AM
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
yeah it is Kepong Sentral. I can tell you which location I snap at.
I was lucky that during that time the hot and bright sunlight caused a dramatic contrast between the areas exposed to the light and the areas in the shadows. just practise la. you'll get it eventually. btw I've edited the earlier post with numbers for each pic. #1, #2, #3 and #5 - 18-55 kit lens. #4, #6, #7 and #8 - Tamron 70-300mm This post has been edited by goldfries: Nov 29 2007, 03:21 AM |
|
|
Nov 30 2007, 02:40 PM
|
Senior Member
859 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
omg.. I commute to work from KL sentral Everyday!!!
Why I never get to see you wan? |
|
|
Dec 1 2007, 12:11 AM
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
fren. KL Sentral the KTM is underground wan la. this one is Kepong Sentral.
and I was only there becos I was visiting some place. |
|
|
Dec 1 2007, 12:24 PM
|
Senior Member
2,078 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Kuching, Sarawak.
|
the last pic... superb...
 |
|
|
Dec 19 2007, 12:58 AM
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
sorry, so long didn't reply.
on other forums, people also like the last pic. hrmmm............ |
|
|
Dec 24 2007, 06:23 AM
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
     25 pictures in this album. i can't be posting all here la. direct link to gallery is here http://www.goldfries.com/inperson/mygaller...ipaintball&n=25 those photos were taken with PAIN. real pain, because paintball are flying all over the place. stand clear of their supposed target area also some how it still come at me. took quite a few hits, blue black. hit my mask, smear my camera. blablablbalbal eh again, not easy ah snapping with the camera a distance away from your face. note that i have to wear facemask. C&C welcomed, make sure you quote the picture from the gallery (or here) if you want to know more details on the shot or would like to comment on it. all shots were taken on Aperture Priority mode. |
|
|
Dec 24 2007, 09:50 AM
|
Junior Member
168 posts Joined: Jan 2006 From: 404 Error. Home Not Found
|
QUOTE(goldfries @ Nov 29 2007, 01:42 AM) #7 |
|
|
Dec 24 2007, 01:04 PM
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
QUOTE(knightrazor @ Dec 24 2007, 09:50 AM) How did u manage to get this? Did u really stand on the rails and shoot? All i did was stand at the platform. the rails were curved leh. |
|
|
Dec 30 2007, 08:24 AM
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
pardon my low-light shooting picture standard. i know it sucks
i didn't bring tripod. i didn't bring flash unit. i only bring my mouth and stomach cos that's the purpose of the night. 1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  C&C are welcome. |
|
|
Dec 30 2007, 10:48 AM
|
Senior Member
628 posts Joined: Aug 2007
|
no#4 nice........can see the fire flakes
|
|
|
Dec 30 2007, 12:39 PM
|
 
VIP
9,778 posts Joined: Jun 2005 From: KL(Wangsa Maju) , Seremban 2 
|
You are not afraid that your lens got bbq-ed too?
|
|
|
Dec 30 2007, 01:10 PM
|
|
Senior Member
2,040 posts Joined: Oct 2004 From: UK
|
wad lens u using? feels like its taken from a tele lens btw
|
|
|
Dec 30 2007, 04:42 PM
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
thanks guys. I was using my 18-200 OS and 50mm f1.8 II.
thought of snapping the family + friends gathering here and there but when i arrive then i thought "damn, i should've brought my tripod along!" oh well. want to know which one using which, just ask la. btw #4 where you see the fire flakes was using 50mm f1.8 II |
|
|
Dec 30 2007, 04:49 PM
|
|
Senior Member
3,114 posts Joined: Dec 2006
|
i like the first pic...the grill reflected by the sky very nice...
|
|
|
Dec 30 2007, 07:12 PM
|
Senior Member
6,413 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Puchong Not For Human Live One....
|
Somehow no 7 will be nice if the subject is focused well.
|
|
|
Dec 31 2007, 12:53 AM
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
QUOTE(orenzai @ Dec 30 2007, 04:49 PM) i like the first pic...the grill reflected by the sky very nice... yeah it was after the rain. skies were clear and blueish. QUOTE(travis_ckf @ Dec 30 2007, 07:12 PM) Somehow no 7 will be nice if the subject is focused well. yeah lor. that food was placed when I'm not walking around, saw it, snapped it.thought it's some what decent but yup, definitely can be improved. thanks all! |
|
|
Dec 31 2007, 11:07 AM
|
Senior Member
744 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Brisbane, Australia
|
Cannot see the people BBQ one??
Never post is it xD |
|
|
Dec 31 2007, 12:53 PM
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
i think the people want privacy la. got pics but only they see lor.
|
|
|
Dec 31 2007, 02:17 PM
|
|
Senior Member
744 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Brisbane, Australia
|
haha I saw flare on #9
|
|
|
Dec 31 2007, 02:43 PM
|
|
Senior Member
1,109 posts Joined: Oct 2007
|
vote to no 4.
btw..18-200 mm is ur favorite gear? |
|
|
Dec 31 2007, 02:55 PM
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
QUOTE([ - i l l u s i o n s - ] @ Dec 31 2007, 02:17 PM) haha I saw flare on #9 doesn't matter to me. QUOTE(fcbarcelona-my @ Dec 31 2007, 02:43 PM) vote to no 4. yes. convenient but heavy lens. btw..18-200 mm is ur favorite gear? now i use it most of the time, replaced my kit lens and 70-300. |
|
|
Jan 9 2008, 11:50 PM
|
|
Senior Member
2,657 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
Nice photos you have goldfries.
Im thinking of getting 18-200OS as well, lazy to change lens during events. Unless got 2 bodies |
|
|
Jan 10 2008, 01:11 AM
|
|
Senior Member
2,293 posts Joined: Feb 2006 From: Sarawak
|
Wow...
Your shots are getting better and better now. Nice work! |
|
|
Jan 14 2008, 05:27 PM
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
thanks guys! so many pics to process yet so little time.
|
|
|
Mar 29 2008, 11:25 PM
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
#1
 #2  #3  #4  #5  #6  #7  #8  #9  #10  This post has been edited by goldfries: Mar 29 2008, 11:26 PM |
|
|
Mar 29 2008, 11:26 PM
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
#11
 #12  #13  #14  #15  #16  #17  #18  #19  #20  |
|
|
Mar 29 2008, 11:27 PM
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
#21
 #22  #23  #24  #25  #26  #27  #28  #29  #30  |
|
|
Mar 29 2008, 11:28 PM
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
#31
 #32  #33  #34  #35  This post has been edited by goldfries: Mar 29 2008, 11:46 PM |
|
|
Mar 29 2008, 11:36 PM
|
|
Senior Member
1,766 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Klang Valley
|
QUOTE This one not bad. I'd crop closer to leave the hand out of the frame though. |
|
|
Mar 29 2008, 11:42 PM
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
QUOTE(kelvinyam @ Mar 29 2008, 11:36 PM) This one not bad. I'd crop closer to leave the hand out of the frame though. ahh. a few things la. i always like my shot to be 6x4 or 4x6 in this case, that's the best i can crop. leaving the hand is alright for me cos i wanted to show that the fella was in a human's embrace (or more like cekik here. )brb i go try another cropping style for it. if nicer then I'll use your suggestion.  like this? This post has been edited by goldfries: Mar 29 2008, 11:48 PM |
|
|
Mar 30 2008, 12:21 AM
|
Senior Member
2,475 posts Joined: Nov 2005 From: kopitiam
|
i believe sum1 just got his 10-22mm eh?
|
|
|
Mar 30 2008, 12:23 AM
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
Sigma 10-20
fun lens to use to get wider coverage. got it about a month ago. still have my holiday trip shots I've not yet processed. aihhh.......sooooooooooooooo many things to do. |
|
|
Mar 30 2008, 01:06 AM
|
|
Senior Member
6,413 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Puchong Not For Human Live One....
|
Good pics mate, but i wonder why u didnt take the dogs?
|
|
|
Mar 30 2008, 01:13 AM
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
the dogs? too many people taking dogs already, I go take other thing else.
got la here and there. my pic covers dogs also mah. i tot there's a balance already. |
|
|
Mar 30 2008, 01:17 AM
|
|
Senior Member
6,413 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Puchong Not For Human Live One....
|
QUOTE(goldfries @ Mar 30 2008, 01:13 AM) the dogs? too many people taking dogs already, I go take other thing else. Seriously can learn frm u here. My shots are too many focused to dogs than human too. got la here and there. my pic covers dogs also mah. i tot there's a balance already. Well will upload mine soon |
|
|
Mar 30 2008, 01:26 AM
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
ahh. here is where share share and learn learn is done.
for me, i noticed that the crowd is all too focused on dogs. i have nothing against dogs but for me, the attention on the dogs were so great that I decided to go for the lesser noticed things in the exhibition. for example, how many actually noticed the marine tank? and Petster's Kibbles? |
|
|
Mar 30 2008, 01:54 AM
|
|
Senior Member
6,413 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Puchong Not For Human Live One....
|
QUOTE(goldfries @ Mar 30 2008, 01:26 AM) ahh. here is where share share and learn learn is done. U do think out of the box huh? for me, i noticed that the crowd is all too focused on dogs. i have nothing against dogs but for me, the attention on the dogs were so great that I decided to go for the lesser noticed things in the exhibition. for example, how many actually noticed the marine tank? and Petster's Kibbles? I just realised most of my dog pics were passport based. I guess i must got stuck shooting portraits all these while. |
|
|
Mar 30 2008, 02:06 PM
|
Senior Member
1,387 posts Joined: Feb 2006 From: 192.168.1.1
|
how cute!!!!!
da cat |
|
|
Mar 30 2008, 03:43 PM
|
Senior Member
765 posts Joined: Aug 2007
|
I love 19 and 23....
Them kitties giving that innocent pitiful look.... |
|
|
Mar 30 2008, 11:37 PM
|
Senior Member
2,062 posts Joined: Oct 2007 From: Kuala Lumpur
|
Goldfries, I am in love with the yellow cat, but the fella looks so sad. I cant sleep thinking of the kitten
|
|
|
Mar 30 2008, 11:59 PM
|
Senior Member
1,492 posts Joined: Nov 2007 From: on top of mountain
|
i've no ide why
but i keep on lookin pic #3 |
|
|
Apr 1 2008, 09:14 AM
|
Senior Member
1,266 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: The Lion City
|
bro, show us what you have shot during your Penang trip ler...
|
|
|
Apr 7 2008, 11:21 PM
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
aihh. got a lot of work at the moment. Pet World photos 2nd batch also not up yet.
|
|
|
Apr 8 2008, 11:42 AM
|
Senior Member
1,843 posts Joined: Jan 2006
|
QUOTE(goldfries @ Mar 29 2008, 11:27 PM) » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « she died might be of curiosity, i live at an apartment around 24th floor, when she sees the balcony is open she'll try to jump out. well, eventually she did. |
|
|
Apr 8 2008, 04:36 PM
|
Senior Member
1,903 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Wg Maju
|
I see longkang in one of the photos. HAHA
I was there on Sunday though, and why is one of the photographer using flash at the aquarium =.=" |
|
|
Apr 13 2008, 09:12 PM
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
no reply cos busy.
QUOTE(MR.Shiney @ Apr 8 2008, 11:42 AM) goldfries, this cat reminds me of my cat sad. she died might be of curiosity, i live at an apartment around 24th floor, when she sees the balcony is open she'll try to jump out. well, eventually she did. probably distracted or something. this height, 4 legs and 9 lives won't save it. sometimes they do stupid things.QUOTE(rukawa @ Apr 8 2008, 04:36 PM) I see longkang in one of the photos. HAHA I was there on Sunday though, and why is one of the photographer using flash at the aquarium =.=" everyone loves longkang. see la the PC Fair pics. all the drools. donno him. hehe. normaly those aquariums are really brightly lit already. |
|
|
Apr 14 2008, 08:30 PM
|
|
Senior Member
686 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
QUOTE(goldfries @ Mar 29 2008, 11:42 PM) ahh. a few things la. i always like my shot to be 6x4 or 4x6 after crop less detail of the cat eyes and its bulu liao neh in this case, that's the best i can crop. leaving the hand is alright for me cos i wanted to show that the fella was in a human's embrace (or more like cekik here. )brb i go try another cropping style for it. if nicer then I'll use your suggestion. like this? btw, can see noise on the blue carpet iso? This post has been edited by tongyam: Apr 14 2008, 08:30 PM |
|
|
Apr 15 2008, 12:03 AM
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
ISO1600 already ler. cos the lighting pretty bad.
|
|
|
Apr 15 2008, 12:15 AM
|
|
Senior Member
686 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
u crop 100% ar?
|
|
|
Apr 15 2008, 02:06 AM
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
you asking about the cat? no la not 100%. what you see in that pic is practically the width of the original picture, as seen in the earlier pages.
This post has been edited by goldfries: Apr 25 2008, 02:19 AM |
|
|
Apr 25 2008, 02:20 AM
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
Sorry, never had the chance to process it due to lotsa work.
So now, here's the pictures from 2nd day. Instead of posting all 45 new pics at once, I'll go by batches of 10 for lesser loading and better attention too. pics removed for faster loading. please visit my gallery for those pictures removed. This post has been edited by goldfries: Jun 30 2008, 05:37 AM |
|
|
Apr 25 2008, 07:48 AM
|
|
Senior Member
1,766 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Klang Valley
|
I'd suggest lighten up the eyes and make the catch light more visible since you are not using flash.
|
|
|
Apr 27 2008, 06:06 AM
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
thanks kelvin. but can you elaborate further? cos that area, very minimal lights for me to play around with. and pets aren't something that cooperate well with composition.
anyway, adding 10 more pictars pics removed for faster loading. please visit my gallery for those pictures removed. This post has been edited by goldfries: Jun 30 2008, 05:37 AM |
|
|
Apr 27 2008, 09:34 AM
|
|
Senior Member
1,492 posts Joined: Nov 2007 From: on top of mountain
|
pic no #19 on post #230
is that true hair color?? so funny laa... but i like pic no #23 on post #204 can feel the sadness of the cat arghhh...feel so pity on that cat |
|
|
Apr 27 2008, 03:02 PM
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
QUOTE(dark lenanza @ Apr 27 2008, 09:34 AM) pic no #19 on post #230 is that true hair color?? so funny laa... yeah. they mod dogs like how people mod cars. QUOTE(dark lenanza @ Apr 27 2008, 09:34 AM) but i like pic no #23 on post #204 sad? i think they look sad only la. those type of kitten always look sad. can feel the sadness of the cat arghhh...feel so pity on that cat so hard to get a good shot on them because they keep coming at me. |
|
|
Apr 27 2008, 03:19 PM
|
Senior Member
5,793 posts Joined: Feb 2005 From: Command & Conquer 3
|
QUOTE(MR.Shiney @ Apr 8 2008, 11:42 AM) goldfries, this cat reminds me of my cat I thought we cannot keep pet in apartment? she died might be of curiosity, i live at an apartment around 24th floor, when she sees the balcony is open she'll try to jump out. well, eventually she did. |
|
|
Apr 28 2008, 05:08 PM
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
not all apartments are strict in pet enforcement. and cats aren't noisy like dogs. (yes, i'm speaking from my experience as a person who took care of cats and dogs before)
pics removed for faster loading. please visit my gallery for those pictures removed. This post has been edited by goldfries: Jun 30 2008, 05:37 AM |
|
|
Apr 30 2008, 12:56 AM
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
pics removed for faster loading.
please visit my gallery for those pictures removed. This post has been edited by goldfries: Jun 30 2008, 05:36 AM |
|
|
Apr 30 2008, 12:25 PM
|
|
Senior Member
744 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Brisbane, Australia
|
I want to see more pictures of fishes!
|
|
|
Jun 30 2008, 05:36 AM
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
my weekend outing........
18-200 OS #1  10-20 #2  #3  #4  #5  #6  |
|
|
Jun 30 2008, 10:29 AM
|
Junior Member
499 posts Joined: Dec 2007
|
For some reason they look emo xD
I personally like #3 the most. |
|
|
Jun 30 2008, 11:07 AM
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
they? who they? all the pictures ah? or the earlier pets?
|
|
|
Jun 30 2008, 11:36 AM
|
|
Junior Member
499 posts Joined: Dec 2007
|
QUOTE(goldfries @ Jun 30 2008, 11:07 AM) they? who they? all the pictures ah? or the earlier pets? Oh haha should had stated clearly which "they".The latest batch, #1 - #4 |
|
|
Jun 30 2008, 11:50 AM
|
|
All Stars
21,256 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Pekopon
|
EMO feel Landscape
|
|
|
Jun 30 2008, 11:55 AM
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
ahah yeah. 1st time i see people use EMO word on landscape pictars.
but i'm glad got people out there feel it la. |
|
|
Jun 30 2008, 12:26 PM
|
Senior Member
1,467 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Online wirelessly
|
very nice landscape
|
|
|
Jun 30 2008, 12:50 PM
|
|
Junior Member
499 posts Joined: Dec 2007
|
QUOTE(goldfries @ Jun 30 2008, 11:55 AM) ahah yeah. 1st time i see people use EMO word on landscape pictars. I'm weird xDbut i'm glad got people out there feel it la. It's just the overall dark feeling. |
|
|
Jun 30 2008, 06:16 PM
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
yup - it was dark. a gloomy day but i so happen to see the rather dramatic sky. the sunset was just on the horizon so i took the opportunity.
i only wished the sunlight was a little stronger on #4 #2, aihh a lot of trees kacau but manage to get a nice shot in the end. |
|
|
Jul 1 2008, 11:54 PM
|
Senior Member
962 posts Joined: Jan 2006 From: شه عالم
|
seems like landscape shot from "I am Legend" intro scene.
|
|
|
Jul 3 2008, 11:39 AM
|
Junior Member
38 posts Joined: Apr 2008
|
great shot bro....
nice pic... |
|
|
Jul 19 2008, 01:57 AM
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
Thanks guys for all the good words!
Now, new set of pictures. I was covering a swimming event on 18th July (Friday) and the participants were from Primary 1 to Primary 6. So sorry la, don't expect Olympic quality swimmers. These are just kids having fun, most of them jump into the water with tummy hitting the water straight on. The participants are pretty much lack of swimming skills across the board. Getting a nice shot isn't easy as most of their strokes are either badly timed or just look like some desperate struggle just to get it over with. Generally I don't have much ground to play with, it's all about spotting the better swimmer and hope to get a nice shot before it's beyond composition point. Anyway, here are my best for the day. #1  #2  #3  #4  C&C welcome of course. |
|
|
Jul 19 2008, 09:56 AM
|
|
Senior Member
1,109 posts Joined: Oct 2007
|
nice photo goldfries. vote #2
|
|
|
Jul 19 2008, 12:44 PM
|
VIP
1,438 posts Joined: Aug 2007
|
Like the #2~!!
Geez, it's been more than a year I didn't go for swimming This post has been edited by felicious: Jul 19 2008, 12:45 PM |
|
|
Jul 19 2008, 01:17 PM
|
|
Senior Member
2,475 posts Joined: Nov 2005 From: kopitiam
|
omg. pedo. lol. nice smimming pics
|
|
|
Jul 19 2008, 02:13 PM
|
Senior Member
2,080 posts Joined: Aug 2007 From: Current: PJ, Hometown: PG
|
nice shot! like #2,3,4...
the liquid form of silhouette on the face makes a sharp picture! and i like to see all these photos full of expression! |
|
|
Jul 19 2008, 02:33 PM
|
Senior Member
5,469 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: PJ
|
#2 is looking at you
|
|
|
Jul 20 2008, 09:19 AM
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
thanks guys!
btw the gear is used is Canon 350D + EF 70-200 F4L USM. |
|
|
Jul 20 2008, 03:38 PM
|
Elite
4,210 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Malaysia
|
Great shot on #2. But it would've been better on a landscape so you see the boys arms. If I recall in swim shots, tighter angels are used on the breathe to create the intense feeling.
Wahhh! 70-200.. i must go find you liao, goldie. |
|
|
Jul 20 2008, 03:42 PM
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
yeah surely would've been better on landscape but everything is fast, his next surfacing and i would've lost the angle already so no choice but make best out of the scenario.
|
|
|
Jul 21 2008, 05:49 AM
|
|
Senior Member
1,067 posts Joined: Nov 2004 From: Puncak Jalil
|
whee~!! i like dat #1... but #2's compo does look like a bit too tight.. nevertheless, the blueness of those photos really gives me the chill.... :shivers: huhuhuu :wink:
|
| Change to: |  0.0894sec
 0.37
 5 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 22nd December 2025 - 05:44 AM |
Quote