Outline ·
[ Standard ] ·
Linear+
Personal when everyone shoot models......i shoot......, goldfries' gallery
|
spetnaz
|
Jun 4 2007, 10:31 AM
|
|
QUOTE(goldfries @ Apr 21 2007, 12:41 AM) Are those pics from the Tamron 70-300? Mind sharing the Exif? Would like to know the capability of the lens for indoor shooting as i'm thinking to get one
|
|
|
|
|
|
spetnaz
|
Jun 4 2007, 04:31 PM
|
|
QUOTE(goldfries @ Jun 4 2007, 03:29 PM) wah eh you quoted the album that i find i did my worst la.  btw which shot you referring to? yes, they're taken using Tamron 70-300mm. from what i gathered so far, the Sigma 70-300mm is better. thank you.  i only have 3 lens so far. 18-55 canon kit lens + 70-300mm tamron + 50mm f1.8 canon prime lens. the 1U fashion show is 70-300m tamron normal mode. flowers, 70-300mm tamron on macro mode. midvalley fashion show is mix of 70-300mm tamron and 50mm f1.8 canon. This 2   Those are the best in terms of sharpness Or any exif for pics that you zoomed beyond 200mm or max tele at 300mm This post has been edited by spetnaz: Jun 4 2007, 04:37 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
spetnaz
|
Jun 4 2007, 09:29 PM
|
|
QUOTE(goldfries @ Jun 4 2007, 07:25 PM) PIC #1 1/160, F5.6, 70mm, ISO800. WB auto (that's why yelllowish) PIC #2 1/125, F5.6, 259mm, ISO800. WB auto (that's why yelllowish) those pics resized then PP on sharpness a bit. IMO they're not as sharp as my other pics, after all those that you quoted are my 1st DSLR outing.  subsequent ones are better, and i rarely zoom at full 300mm because i use hand, no IS / VR / SR whatever you call those anti-shake tech. the only time i always zoom 300mm is when shooting moon. that also not that clear on the moon's details (not telescope). Thanks for sharing. I'm a newbie myself. Pic #2 thou only 1/125 @ 259mm, but for me, the pic is quiet sharp. Personally, i would prefer the Auto WB for the warm colour rather than the Tungsten WB which will turn the pic bluish (my taste lar).
|
|
|
|
|