Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Personal when everyone shoot models......i shoot......, goldfries' gallery

views
     
spetnaz
post Jun 4 2007, 10:31 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
484 posts

Joined: Dec 2006
QUOTE(goldfries @ Apr 21 2007, 12:41 AM)
before i go for the Fashion show again, here's additional pictures from my earlier shoot.

user posted imageuser posted image
user posted imageuser posted image
user posted imageuser posted image
user posted imageuser posted image
*
Are those pics from the Tamron 70-300? Mind sharing the Exif? Would like to know the capability of the lens for indoor shooting as i'm thinking to get one

spetnaz
post Jun 4 2007, 04:31 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
484 posts

Joined: Dec 2006
QUOTE(goldfries @ Jun 4 2007, 03:29 PM)
wah eh you quoted the album that i find i did my worst la. tongue.gif

btw which shot you referring to?

yes, they're taken using Tamron 70-300mm. from what i gathered so far, the Sigma 70-300mm is better.
thank you. biggrin.gif

i only have 3 lens so far. 18-55 canon kit lens + 70-300mm tamron +  50mm f1.8 canon prime lens.

the 1U fashion show is 70-300m tamron normal mode. flowers, 70-300mm tamron on macro mode. midvalley fashion show is mix of 70-300mm tamron and 50mm f1.8 canon.
*
This 2

user posted image

user posted image

Those are the best in terms of sharpness

Or any exif for pics that you zoomed beyond 200mm or max tele at 300mm

This post has been edited by spetnaz: Jun 4 2007, 04:37 PM
spetnaz
post Jun 4 2007, 09:29 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
484 posts

Joined: Dec 2006
QUOTE(goldfries @ Jun 4 2007, 07:25 PM)
PIC #1
1/160, F5.6, 70mm, ISO800. WB auto (that's why yelllowish)

PIC #2
1/125, F5.6, 259mm, ISO800. WB auto (that's why yelllowish)

those pics resized then PP on sharpness a bit. IMO they're not as sharp as my other pics, after all those that you quoted are my 1st DSLR outing. biggrin.gif subsequent ones are better, and i rarely zoom at full 300mm because i use hand, no IS / VR / SR whatever you call those anti-shake tech.

the only time i always zoom 300mm is when shooting moon. that also not that clear on the moon's details (not telescope).
*
Thanks for sharing. I'm a newbie myself. Pic #2 thou only 1/125 @ 259mm, but for me, the pic is quiet sharp. Personally, i would prefer the Auto WB for the warm colour rather than the Tungsten WB which will turn the pic bluish (my taste lar).



 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0132sec    0.47    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 21st December 2025 - 06:50 PM