Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

209 Pages « < 180 181 182 183 184 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 LYN Official Honda CR-V (Gen5/Gen6) thread V1, Gen5 CRV is launched

views
     
fazleysyam
post Mar 19 2025, 10:17 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
7 posts

Joined: Oct 2004


QUOTE(Old1030 @ Mar 15 2025, 12:59 PM)
My G5 is TCP
My G6 is AWD

The only reason i go for V Specs is the camera,, not the driving dynamic,, and how often we hantam corner, we all uncle already, our boy racer era have gone,, and why you want take corner at high speed ?.. this is not GTR

If I can turn back time I will choose 2WD, the 360 camera in this car is  sweat.gif

Dont get me wrong,, this  gen is the best gen in term of driving experience and NVH, but build quality for some parts esp inside is total let down

Like I said before I always miss my G3
*
psssttt...im only 27 maaa...still muda..hehehehe

anyway IMHO, having a 4wd otr is more into sense of security where it will provide more traction as and when required. between 4wd and 2wd, for driving experience i will go for 4wd, but for pocket will go for 2wd.
touristking
post Mar 19 2025, 02:09 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
5,831 posts

Joined: Jun 2017
QUOTE(fazleysyam @ Mar 19 2025, 03:17 AM)
psssttt...im only 27 maaa...still muda..hehehehe

anyway IMHO, having a 4wd otr is more into sense of security where it will provide more traction as and when required. between 4wd and 2wd, for driving experience i will go for 4wd, but for pocket will go for 2wd.
*
I once tried a 1.5T AWD and the pick up was unacceptable. So I went 2WD
Old1030
post Mar 19 2025, 09:56 PM

On my way
****
Junior Member
572 posts

Joined: Jun 2012


QUOTE(fazleysyam @ Mar 19 2025, 10:17 AM)
psssttt...im only 27 maaa...still muda..hehehehe

anyway IMHO, having a 4wd otr is more into sense of security where it will provide more traction as and when required. between 4wd and 2wd, for driving experience i will go for 4wd, but for pocket will go for 2wd.
*
Based on my experience, the traction is not there when we at stand still, the pick up is bad
Its only come after the tire rolling,
touristking
post Mar 20 2025, 07:36 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
5,831 posts

Joined: Jun 2017
QUOTE(Old1030 @ Mar 19 2025, 02:56 PM)
Based on my experience, the traction is not there when we at stand still, the pick up is bad
Its only come after the tire rolling,
*
I have never come across anyone saying the AWD pick up is bad.

So I thought the 1.5T AWD that I tried must be a defective unit with unacceptable take-off from standstill.
ayamxxx
post Mar 20 2025, 08:58 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,061 posts

Joined: Apr 2010
From: Kuala Lumpur



QUOTE(Old1030 @ Mar 19 2025, 09:56 PM)
Based on my experience, the traction is not there when we at stand still, the pick up is bad
Its only come after the tire rolling,
*
could it be Honda tuned the ECU to not aggressive start-up acceleration to protect the CVT gb?
touristking
post Mar 20 2025, 10:14 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
5,831 posts

Joined: Jun 2017
QUOTE(ayamxxx @ Mar 20 2025, 01:58 AM)
could it be Honda tuned the ECU to not aggressive start-up acceleration to protect the CVT gb?
*
I think the 1.5T simply doesn't have enough power to do a quick pick up. Otherwise, how come the 2WD is OK but the AWD I tried was pretty bad?

DM3
post Mar 20 2025, 11:32 AM

INSPIRATOR
*******
Senior Member
6,620 posts

Joined: Jun 2009
Possible due to Crv much heavier as G10 same engine n specs but pick up damn good
touristking
post Mar 20 2025, 02:52 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
5,831 posts

Joined: Jun 2017
QUOTE(DM3 @ Mar 20 2025, 04:32 AM)
Possible due to Crv much heavier as G10 same engine n specs but pick up damn good
*
This is why I say, I am not sure the 1.5T AWD is faulty or not. Never have the chance to drive other unit. May be those who have driven both can comment on the pickup power.
Old1030
post Mar 20 2025, 08:13 PM

On my way
****
Junior Member
572 posts

Joined: Jun 2012


QUOTE(touristking @ Mar 20 2025, 02:52 PM)
This is why I say, I am not sure the 1.5T AWD is faulty or not. Never have the chance to drive other unit. May be those who have driven both can comment on the pickup power.
*
I dont think its faulty, its the characteristic, with 2WD the engine power all force to Front, while AWD with same engine power need to power all wheel, and remember that V Specs is heavier

Weight S vs E vs V
1611kg VS 1616kg VS 1668kg

0-100
9.7 VS 9.8 VS 10.4
shaunkL
post Mar 21 2025, 12:55 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
238 posts

Joined: Apr 2009
Hi All,
Currently Honda provides big discount on E spec and RS spec.

In dilemma which one shall get,
E Spec
Pros : Got spare tyre
Cons : no TPMS, no 360 camera, higher fuel consumption

RS Spec
Pros : Full spec, lower fuel consumption
Cons : no spare tyre
WhiteFlag
post Mar 21 2025, 01:19 PM

On my way
****
Junior Member
540 posts

Joined: Jan 2008
QUOTE(shaunkL @ Mar 21 2025, 12:55 PM)
Hi All,
Currently Honda provides big discount on E spec and RS spec.

In dilemma which one shall get,
E Spec
Pros : Got spare tyre
Cons : no TPMS, no 360 camera, higher fuel consumption

RS Spec
Pros : Full spec, lower fuel consumption
Cons : no spare tyre
*
can pm what is the big discount for RS?
Cavino
post Mar 21 2025, 03:36 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
842 posts

Joined: May 2009


QUOTE(shaunkL @ Mar 21 2025, 12:55 PM)
Hi All,
Currently Honda provides big discount on E spec and RS spec.

In dilemma which one shall get,
E Spec
Pros : Got spare tyre
Cons : no TPMS, no 360 camera, higher fuel consumption

RS Spec
Pros : Full spec, lower fuel consumption
Cons : no spare tyre
*
What dilemma, if you have the dough, RS Spec is the one to go mainly becoz the eHev is true flagship of the current gen CRV.
Forget about lower fuel consumption, the cost premium over even the V specs means the fuel savings can never cover the cost difference between the specs.

If you are a bit tight, then E spec is the one to go for in terms of value for money albeit you don't get the true benefit of current gen CRV techs that are all available in RS spec.

So there is really no dilemma. Got the money without pushing your limit, the RS. Not enuf, then E spec. That also pushing limit, you should not get CRV or any cars at this range....like me...hahaha..
free2d
post Mar 21 2025, 03:58 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
72 posts

Joined: Dec 2014


No spare tire is my deal breaker. End up with 1.5T
touristking
post Mar 21 2025, 04:36 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
5,831 posts

Joined: Jun 2017
QUOTE(shaunkL @ Mar 21 2025, 05:55 AM)
Hi All,
Currently Honda provides big discount on E spec and RS spec.

In dilemma which one shall get,
E Spec
Pros : Got spare tyre
Cons : no TPMS, no 360 camera, higher fuel consumption

RS Spec
Pros : Full spec, lower fuel consumption
Cons : no spare tyre
*
I got the E and my reasoning could be different from yours.

For high speed high way driving, 1.5T is better than the RS. Once over ~100kph, it is the lesser power 2.0 engine doing the work in RS. I would think important for high speed 130 - 150 kph overtaking and many roads here aren't dual carriage

I occasionally left the car unused for many weeks and car may not start and may have to be tow to workshop. Could be the 12V or the hybrid battery. I don't want such headache.

I feel uncomfortable without spare tires. Town may be OK but not long distance.

Fuel economy. With RM 20K saving, not an issue

The only previous gen 1.5T AWD I tried has unacceptable slower pick up. I only like the V spec 360 camera but what to do? Beside, it has a higher center of gravity so may be less stable? I wouldn't know.

The good things of RS will be for town driving smoothness, power, fuel economy and idling, RS wins.
touristking
post Mar 21 2025, 05:22 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
5,831 posts

Joined: Jun 2017
QUOTE(Old1030 @ Mar 20 2025, 01:13 PM)
I dont think its faulty, its the characteristic, with 2WD the engine power all force to Front, while AWD with same engine power need to power all wheel, and remember that V Specs is heavier

Weight S vs E vs V
1611kg VS 1616kg VS 1668kg

0-100
9.7 VS 9.8 VS 10.4
*
I did expect AWD to be slower but did not expect it to be SO MUCH slower to be unacceptable. Hence my doubt of that particular unit being faulty.

But I do seem to remember, once on the move, power seems OK.


incognitroll
post Mar 21 2025, 10:51 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
148 posts

Joined: Oct 2018
QUOTE(Old1030 @ Mar 20 2025, 08:13 PM)
I dont think its faulty, its the characteristic, with 2WD the engine power all force to Front, while AWD with same engine power need to power all wheel, and remember that V Specs is heavier

Weight S vs E vs V
1611kg VS 1616kg VS 1668kg

0-100
9.7 VS 9.8 VS 10.4
*
the honda cr-v awd is not always on. it activates only when slippage is detected in the front wheels, such as during rain, snow, or off-road conditions. so, for us city folks, i'd say that most of the time, it's running as 2wd.

This post has been edited by incognitroll: Mar 21 2025, 10:53 PM
Old1030
post Mar 22 2025, 12:14 AM

On my way
****
Junior Member
572 posts

Joined: Jun 2012


QUOTE(incognitroll @ Mar 21 2025, 10:51 PM)
the honda cr-v awd is not always on. it activates only when slippage is detected in the front wheels, such as during rain, snow, or off-road conditions. so, for us city folks, i'd say that most of the time, it's running as 2wd.
*
I think its always ON, when we drive we can feel that its not pull (FWD) or push (RWD), always all wheel together
Can even see / monitor the power to each wheel thru multi info meter display
incognitroll
post Mar 22 2025, 01:02 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
148 posts

Joined: Oct 2018
QUOTE(Old1030 @ Mar 22 2025, 12:14 AM)
I think its always ON, when we drive we can feel that its not pull (FWD) or push (RWD), always all wheel together
Can even see / monitor the power to each wheel thru multi info meter display
*
in the manual, it says otherwise.

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


and from chatgpt:

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


This post has been edited by incognitroll: Mar 22 2025, 06:01 AM
touristking
post Mar 22 2025, 06:52 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
5,831 posts

Joined: Jun 2017
It seems those who have driven both the 2WD and AWD do feel the AWD is noticeably slower at pick up. I doubt the extra weight could be sufficient to be the cause of that. So what could be the reason?

Old1030
post Mar 22 2025, 12:39 PM

On my way
****
Junior Member
572 posts

Joined: Jun 2012


QUOTE(incognitroll @ Mar 22 2025, 01:02 AM)
in the manual, it says otherwise.

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


and from chatgpt:

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

*
Herrm
Thanks for info bro

This car even stuggle to get over stiff hump on the road from standstill


209 Pages « < 180 181 182 183 184 > » Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0229sec    1.21    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 17th December 2025 - 11:16 AM