QUOTE(touristking @ Feb 14 2024, 02:20 PM)
I think you might have gotten it the other way around. Subaru should be having the symmetrical AWD instead. Here is an interesting video and yes, the Subaru is superior and that probably contribute to superior cornering stability. May I ask, why are you not getting the Subaru?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2OzK-oRPCbsHybrid. My brief test drive tells me, once at highway speed, there is not much difference between turbo and hybrid. If anything, Hybrid has lower top speed and the switch over to ICE is pretty seamless to me. I did not consider the Hybrid for the same reason as yours...don't want complexity and no spare tire.
Turbo. Hardly felt the turbo lag. Probably because this engine love to revs and before you know it, it is already over 1700rpm. For my driving style, I could never reach 10,000 km in 6 months so I guess service interval is not an issue for me. I shall see whether my assumption is correct or wrong in 6 month's time.
Haha....mistype, mistype.....
Almost book the XV but sudden changes (again) in my intended budget and need to use extra car schedule postponed the purchase again and again.
It really all depends on my kid need to continue her master programme oversea. Might need to reserve part of the budget for my kid oversea study if she decide for it. 2nd we only needed an additional car by 3rd quarter of the year IF my kid did not go for oversea study (thus no urgency to get vehicle yet).
Finally, XV has a b segment space and a small boot, although have almost everything that I want (memory seats, 360, auto tailgate, etc), it is really a 7 years old tech and I would prefer a bigger interior space. The boxer engine still remains a cause of concern with some possible headache in long term maintenance. The parts are more expensive or lack choices for repair in long term due to really small number of XV in Malaysia. With great features, comes greater repair cost if fail, even the front adaptive lamp is 7K a piece with front windscreen at over 5K, can already match the higher C segment CRV part price. So why not get CRV if budget allows.
The new CRV was released with a lower price (E spec with almost main feature) that expected (tot min. 180K to over 200K just for turbo earlier) and it has everything that I really want, high ground clearance, big rear space, big boot, great looks.
I am not likely to hit the top speed ever, so top speed never really matters to me. Since RS have better City drive experience with equal highway drive power, it does tempt me a lot that I try to re-budget to see if I can get it. New car intend to share with my wife (I can switch between sedan and SUV), she will likely take it majority of the time driving in City most of time, for work and taking the kids. I will be driving it with a mixed of 60/40 highway and city. But once hit jam, likely 50/50 on highway city ride. So hybrid with it's supposedly massive fc saving difference in City drive vs turbo does help in lessening the pain of the much higher price tag.
Just think having extra 10K to get better feature (360, better exterior looks, better side mirror feature, adaptive lamp, full digital meter), extra 10k that can be contra back with fuel saving in 10 years or so and extra 10K for the EV experience (hybrid engine, longer service interval, less headache in NA engine wear and tear, EV city drive, turbo/cvt got its own possible headache in long term). Of course once in long term, the battery kaput, IPU or inverter fail, clutch needs replacing, tyre puncture....gg....hahaha...
Actually having no spare tyre is a big concern. For most ppl, it is just for peace of mind but for my wife working area in Port Klang...her car tyres kena quite a number of times laio, so it is a matter of when will kena again.
Again, if I go for RS due to some mind demon taking over with crazy impulse, it is mostly for the EV engine start, EV city drive experience, more instant torque for City or Jam (which I face a lot too besides my wife's City drive), quieter ride, 360 camera, better exterior looks and full digital meter. Saving FC is a great added bonus to lessen the financial impact especially much more so after subsidies removal. with uncertain and definitely higher market price in the future.
For some 360 is not important, most drove without it anyway but for a big SUV with limited parking space, 360 is really a great tool especially when aligning big SUV in tight space. It is not a must but still a great tool especially for small size person (my wife) on high bigger vehicle, thus my reluctant on missing 360 on E spec, but thinking of upgrading to V spec, really not worth just mainly for 360. Crazy.
If I already budgeted for V spec, upgrading to RS is a straight go but my initial budget is E spec range, so the RS price upgrade of 30K is still really hard to swallow.
Anyway, now just bullshit here and there while waiting for my kid decision to continue her master locally or oversea. If local, then likely get CRV by mid to 3rd quarter of year, if oversea, I think I have to downgrade back to lower segment Cross, XV or even City to divert part of the car fund to study budget. Studying oversea now with our weak currency and rising inflation add about 40% extra to the original intended study budget.
This post has been edited by Cavino: Feb 15 2024, 09:55 AM