QUOTE(ICDeadPeople @ Sep 12 2007, 03:57 PM)
I've been reading some threads is AVS forum, and keep hearing blu boys keep repeating that blu-ray is superior and much better quality than hd dvd. Can somebody shed some light on why it is better, besides a bigger space, even with unfinished product and more expensive? Its making me confuse........
those blu-boys are PS3 owners. there millions of PS3 owners out there, many received the PS3 from their parents. they are corrupting every internet forum about hidef. Go to the HD DVD threads if you want to hear the voices of HT enthusiasts
basically they are claiming all the craps that in real life doesnt matter to people to buy the BD players.
50GB ? hello !! check the amount of disk for the same title released by Warner
and yeah .. bit rate and PCM .. most of the blu boys are highlighting that now because most of their talking points were muted by current events
let me know when they actually talk about something that matters to consumers.
i can highlight several items that are not good for consumers that HD DVD does not have though
BD+
Water mark - allows content owners to embed player serial numbers to the layer.
Region coding
Sep 13 2007, 05:51 AM

Quote
0.0431sec
0.36
7 queries
GZIP Disabled