Still stupid weapon for combat arm, first u dont need 150 rounds in 1 mag, even 1000 rounds per minute burst in the air but not accurate what for?
a. Weapon to heavy
b. Magazine too bulky, cumbersome. not easy to handle if stoppages.
b. Spare magazine? Too bulky if there are. Bear in mind that
[quote=sdin3269,Apr 20 2017, 09:14 AM]
ou dont shoot 150 rounds in a single rounds or shot duration unless you have a bullet store behind you. That 150 rounds is your only rounds issued.
This is a copy of the obselete russian assault riffle BTW this weapon is only use by the Gila NK presidential guard.
[/quote]
U do know that the china troop push back the coalition during the korea way by just the sheer number of army and bullets being fired at all conners. There even incident where an armoured division collum was pushed back due to number of bullet round they are receiving making troop disembarking impossible and fatal.
Victory by volume still applicable in today warfare.
And north korea have plenty of human resource just to do that.
The mindset of surgical warfare is still not in their war book.
Apr 20 2017, 11:04 AM

Quote







0.0336sec
1.02
6 queries
GZIP Disabled