QUOTE(lokideangelus @ Mar 17 2017, 09:07 AM)
Malaysia never a fan of ApacheSeems like we used to be gossiped with the Rooivalk (TD Rejected the idea)
the Tiger and for some time the Zulu Cobra
I too like Zulu Cobra
Military Thread V24, Celebrating 60th Malaysian Merdeka Day
|
|
Mar 17 2017, 02:43 PM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
406 posts Joined: Jun 2007 From: 3°50'**.**"N - 103°16'**.**"E |
|
|
|
Mar 18 2017, 07:31 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
406 posts Joined: Jun 2007 From: 3°50'**.**"N - 103°16'**.**"E |
|
|
|
Mar 20 2017, 06:45 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
406 posts Joined: Jun 2007 From: 3°50'**.**"N - 103°16'**.**"E |
|
|
|
Mar 21 2017, 12:34 AM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
406 posts Joined: Jun 2007 From: 3°50'**.**"N - 103°16'**.**"E |
![]() anyone catch this already? |
|
|
Mar 21 2017, 01:46 PM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
406 posts Joined: Jun 2007 From: 3°50'**.**"N - 103°16'**.**"E |
|
|
|
Mar 22 2017, 02:43 PM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
406 posts Joined: Jun 2007 From: 3°50'**.**"N - 103°16'**.**"E |
|
|
|
Mar 22 2017, 03:23 PM
Return to original view | Post
#7
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
406 posts Joined: Jun 2007 From: 3°50'**.**"N - 103°16'**.**"E |
QUOTE(yinchet @ Mar 22 2017, 02:45 PM) the same like before the Erieye, but not sure on what platformit's more to SAAB offset even before this when Gripen was rumored for leased the Erieye is under different set of deals and circumstances QUOTE(James831 @ Mar 22 2017, 02:46 PM) MPA under different dealsQUOTE(yinchet @ Mar 22 2017, 02:53 PM) 36 super hornet + 4 e2d + weapons package + maintenance + spare. Me think +- 5bilI think it going to cost malaysia usd4bil max. not sure if this original deals include the FMS |
|
|
Mar 22 2017, 06:33 PM
Return to original view | Post
#8
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
406 posts Joined: Jun 2007 From: 3°50'**.**"N - 103°16'**.**"E |
QUOTE(thpace @ Mar 22 2017, 05:30 PM) Would be nice if they offer globaleye together globaleye is just and newer erieye on different platformItu saja? Why would need another jet trainer when our hawk still can go on QUOTE(KLboy92 @ Mar 22 2017, 06:12 PM) now you make me crave fro bunneh satey |
|
|
Mar 23 2017, 02:37 AM
Return to original view | Post
#9
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
406 posts Joined: Jun 2007 From: 3°50'**.**"N - 103°16'**.**"E |
QUOTE(DDG_Ross @ Mar 22 2017, 11:25 PM) They are pushing the 2nd batch and 3 batchas all 3 batch have different type of role QUOTE(KLboy92 @ Mar 23 2017, 01:32 AM) Dafuq LCS duit navy sendiri should be okLCS build 0.5 out of 6 already looking at LCS AAW? Will we operate Aster 30?! Should still be produced for some time to come Future USN carrier air wing should be 24 F-35C 24 F/A-18E + 3 or 4 more F/A-18 Growler |
|
|
Mar 23 2017, 01:35 PM
Return to original view | Post
#10
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
406 posts Joined: Jun 2007 From: 3°50'**.**"N - 103°16'**.**"E |
QUOTE(thpace @ Mar 23 2017, 07:19 AM) 1st batch is ASW I remember first batch is ASW and second is AAD 2nd batch is AAR 3rd batch is? Combined ASW/AAR? Multirole? Anyway based on dcns response, it look like the aaw would quite similar to our neighbour formidable class vessel. Meaning syvler vls to similarize with the existing batch but diff different radar system. High possibility of the APAR radar on the intergrated mast system.. somehow we are hooked onto the idea. third I dont recall QUOTE(waja2000 @ Mar 23 2017, 10:42 AM) It' easily recognizable and easier to communicate. |
|
|
Mar 23 2017, 03:06 PM
Return to original view | Post
#11
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
406 posts Joined: Jun 2007 From: 3°50'**.**"N - 103°16'**.**"E |
|
|
|
Mar 25 2017, 12:41 PM
Return to original view | Post
#12
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
406 posts Joined: Jun 2007 From: 3°50'**.**"N - 103°16'**.**"E |
QUOTE(patt_sue @ Mar 25 2017, 12:29 PM) next ,we gonna have 5 types of combat aircraft...sukhoi,f18,hawk,mig,rafale ?.... a truly rojak... in the RMAF future planhow efficient is that with the number of each type of aircraft is very low... we are going to have 5 different types of logistic footprint (maintenance,support,groundcrew and pilot training, etc) Hawk is not a front line fighter |
|
|
Mar 25 2017, 01:46 PM
Return to original view | Post
#13
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
406 posts Joined: Jun 2007 From: 3°50'**.**"N - 103°16'**.**"E |
QUOTE(mumbly297 @ Mar 25 2017, 01:33 PM) Technical the hawk 208 was suppose to be front line figbter back then. But with new multirole aircraft its use is obsolete. Any aircraft is good to be use in Sabah and Sarawak. Even in the Lahad Datu incident the F/A18 joint in the operation. What Sarawak/Sabah airspace lag is a fast multirole fighter to do interception. The TUDM learnt the hardway with MiG29 doing interception duties. To me they should sell the mig. Get Typhoon. 18 plane of tranche 3 and get tranche 2 from Saudi if they want to sell them upgrade to tranche 3. Place one squadron in East malaysia and one in West malaysia. Get another squadron of MKM and place in East. Get second hand FA18 from kuwait or get 16 fA18E/F split them into 2, so you good a good balance. Next trainer scrap the mb339 and hawk and get m346. For turbo prop trainer pc7mk 2 is ok. IIRC the last plan for RMAF is only 2 front role fighterWhy this mix? Easy one scantion/embargo. Two, at any point of time if and aircraft is grounded another can fly. 3. Each aircraft got it pro and con so. Use the best for a mission. For save fuel from flying from east to west and vic versa. but in these original plan does not include the Hawk and the MB339 and even the Hornet at one Point only MKM + (What ever replaces the MIG). |
|
|
Mar 27 2017, 04:35 PM
Return to original view | Post
#14
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
406 posts Joined: Jun 2007 From: 3°50'**.**"N - 103°16'**.**"E |
Damen punya MRSS lawa la pulak
|
|
|
Mar 27 2017, 05:20 PM
Return to original view | Post
#15
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
406 posts Joined: Jun 2007 From: 3°50'**.**"N - 103°16'**.**"E |
|
|
|
Mar 27 2017, 08:46 PM
Return to original view | Post
#16
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
406 posts Joined: Jun 2007 From: 3°50'**.**"N - 103°16'**.**"E |
|
|
|
Mar 28 2017, 01:58 PM
Return to original view | Post
#17
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
406 posts Joined: Jun 2007 From: 3°50'**.**"N - 103°16'**.**"E |
QUOTE(yinchet @ Mar 28 2017, 06:38 AM) How much is kuwait going to sell their aircraft? unclear how much we will pay for the hornets dirt cheap or maybe free but we have to pay for the upgradeIf we can get it dirt cheap I hope our government spend bit more on upgrading all the hornet and perhaps get 2-4 e2d would be the best deal for tudm. We should be less worries on getting 2nd hand f18 that were not operates on aircraft carrier as f18 airframe capable of 8000-9000 hours. The problem is upgrading the hornet to RMAF standard right now is prices the cost of upgrading the hornet swallow almost all the FMS funding in the future maybe, but if in near future we might have to say goodbye to the current MMRCA program |
|
|
Mar 28 2017, 07:57 PM
Return to original view | Post
#18
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
406 posts Joined: Jun 2007 From: 3°50'**.**"N - 103°16'**.**"E |
QUOTE(KLboy92 @ Mar 28 2017, 03:56 PM) Non-upgraded Hornet will have reduced/no commonality with RMAF Hornets, or absolutely tabuli pakai? The only similarity of RMAF hornet and the Kuwaiti's is the radar,fuselage and engineIf the former, should just bite the bullet, at least got more airframes... if latter, then that IS a problem. others has been heavily upgraded in the past 4 years |
|
|
Apr 3 2017, 05:21 PM
Return to original view | Post
#19
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
406 posts Joined: Jun 2007 From: 3°50'**.**"N - 103°16'**.**"E |
QUOTE(lordy @ Apr 3 2017, 11:34 AM) one got to know the threat one faces. TS should start slashing troll postingfor operation and need in Sabah, submarine is no use at all to counter the threat from Sulu. and for South China sea, it is a crowded party there and no match to the mighty PRC. so why waste money? if you felt highly of yourselves please leave we always have a healthy culture here except sometime when bunney is on period we don't need you and certainly you don't need us as we never question on why your forces did what they do and what rights of you to do the same here. from this kind of post clearly you don't have any slight of idea the condition there, the condition of the sea and even the other agencies that are guarding the Sulu sea, mind you recent kidnapping at Sulu sea does not even occur on Malaysia side of the sea. leave that motherfucking my country dick is bigger that yours mentality of just stay away from this thread find Vape on, he need someone to keep his pondaness happy. regards |
|
|
Apr 3 2017, 06:12 PM
Return to original view | Post
#20
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
406 posts Joined: Jun 2007 From: 3°50'**.**"N - 103°16'**.**"E |
Apr 4 2017, 01:35 AM |
|
|
|
| Bump Topic Topic ClosedOptions New Topic |
| Change to: | 0.1253sec
0.69
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 3rd December 2025 - 09:45 AM |