QUOTE(chrisderick88 @ Feb 20 2017, 11:09 PM)
checking in!
I'm a cheapo here trying to build my own medical card by taking "just" medical card without investment link.
Found a "problem":- there's no standalone critical illness cover. So basically if one day i'm worried about critical illness, I'll need to find an investment link.
Also I have the chance to look at ILP vs non-ILP products premium. the exact same cover cost more for non-ILP. WTF!
Yes, it costs more now. 2-3 times more.
One way you can see it is the nett costs in the long term. You'll see that you actually paid less, with more coverage (life sum insured).
The other way you can look into it for a more detailed approach is to look into the medical insurance cost between standalone and ILP (COI).
I trust that you will find the COI for ILP is actually lower compared to standalone medical insurance. This is consistent across the industry.
So to sum up,
ILP covers more, the medical coverage costs you less, and it has the flexibility for you to add on CI coverage and many other riders.
Standalone sets you back less for now but the COI is higher, and it is not flexible.
Let me know if this has been clear and helped you in your decision.
QUOTE(lifebalance @ Feb 20 2017, 11:19 PM)
Well most companies are moving towards ILP. The risk is that there is investment risk that your account value will be 0 before the projected tenure.
On the other hand the non ILP guarantees that you will be covered of that sum assured amount without worrying about any investment risk
but don't expect any cash value return by end of the tenure. Choice is yours to decide
Then it must have been a mistake that cheque of RM758k that I paid out to my leader's policy holder of over 20 years.
ILP has its merits, and the industry has made it very attractive at the price point.
The price for all of us to pay is taking on some of the risks involved.
However, if you have money, you must be crazy to deny traditional life policies.
This post has been edited by JIUHWEI: Feb 21 2017, 10:43 AM