RIP to those who have way more local focused funds vs those who have more foreign focused funds, especially those who have more developed market focused portfolios.
To those who’ve blindly listened to their agents etc and just bought into random funds without putting in any work to simply Google and taken some interest into the fund that you’re dumping your hard earned cash into, its worse for yal. And YOU are to be blamed not your agents. It’s worse for yal due to your lack of putting in the work to actually know what you’ve put your money in. *sorry if it’s redundant, just emphasising that you were careless with you money that you were “investing”*
It’s yet another tough year ahead of such funds (local funds). RIP if you’ve invested 3 or even 5 year before.
That being said, my caution is to consider foreign funds. I’m assuming most of us here are locals of course. Which means the bulk of your investments (epf at least) is tied up in local equities. Which seem bleak to say the least, the klci having a 10yr negative performance and all, factor in annual management fees, etc (for local UTs). I seriously question those who advise to buy pure local funds now given the current climate. The only type of fund I think is advisable for the younger bunch, if you have to, are small cap funds and similar high risk local equity funds (tactical). This is asuming this is one of your only funds matched with a bond Fund to regulate your respective risk tolerance. Accompanied with a regular investment for 10-20 years.
Side note especially if you’re young, do consider an 80 stock and 20 local bonds mix at least. you cannot anticipate when you may have the need to break into your investments despite how confident you are. Unless you have a year’s worth of income in your emergency fund. Just my two cents.
Also, don’t keep holding to losses (UTs), mainly if you have a better place to put those funds that you think would get you out of your losses faster than the fund you’re currently in can. A paper loss is still a Loss. Unless you have a really big fund that you’re using for income now. Consider switching to funds that will take you out of that loss and beyond Vs your current fund.
Don’t be held back by the notion that If your current fund is down pulling out means you lose. Yes you do lose if you pull out and tuck it under your bed. But if there’s a better fund/ opportunity to make better ROIs switch without a beat. I’d like to see the math for those who don’t think pulling out of a losing investment (for the sole purpose of not “realising” losses as a principal) vs investing in another investment that’s yielding better returns. A capital loss is a loss regardless. Your only loss in switching to proper funds is your sales charges etc. but if you’re investing for 20 years ahead this does not matter (switching/ sales charge). The detrimental costs to look out for are obviously the annual charges (eg annual mgmt fees) not one off charges (sales charge).
I’d recommend 60 in a developed market market fund (even a pure US fund) and 20% in apac funds, remaking 20% in a local bond fund.
If you’re feeling risky then do 60% US, 20% Malaysia small cap, 20% local bonds.
Give 20 years or so you’ll beat all those who were wannabe warren buffets or [insert fampus investor here].
If you want something very simple and you have a small DCA amount then Just go for a sinple 2 Fund portfolio, 80% in a global fund and 20% in a local bond fund.
Sorry for the rant. This is probably the advice I’d give my younger self. Don’t bash me hahaha. But no I welcome any disagreements. I’m curious indeed.
Post note. I had my funds all over the place. Having focused down I’ve managed to recoup my losses from apac funds. Not discouraging investments there tho. There’s a place for it in a well diversified portfolio. Now is as good time as any to jump in for long term returns.
My current (UT) portfolio is just
MUlife US Equity 80%
Amanahraya Syariah trust fund (fixed income/“bonds”) 20%
*if curious as to why just US ask me why